|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF App-Delivery SIG
+1 nb
Regards,
Siddharth Bhadri
+1 nb
Regards,
Siddharth Bhadri
|
By
Siddharth Bhadri
·
#3554
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF App-Delivery SIG
+1 non-binding
Radu M
By
Radu M
·
#3553
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF App-Delivery SIG
+1, nb
Cheers,
Nicolas
By
Nicolas Trangez <nicolas.trangez@...>
·
#3552
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF App-Delivery SIG
+1 nb!
By
Stephen Augustus
·
#3551
·
|
|
[VOTE] CNCF App-Delivery SIG
A new CNCF App-Delivery SIG has been proposed with Alexis Richardson and Michelle Noorali as the TOC liaisons.
Co-Chairs: Alois Reitbauer, Bryan Liles and Lei Zhang.
Tech Leads to be decided in the
A new CNCF App-Delivery SIG has been proposed with Alexis Richardson and Michelle Noorali as the TOC liaisons.
Co-Chairs: Alois Reitbauer, Bryan Liles and Lei Zhang.
Tech Leads to be decided in the
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#3550
·
|
|
Re: ChubaoFS Project - SIG Storage Feedback
Apologies - I meant to type Project ChubaoFS not Longhorn in the previous email!
Apologies - I meant to type Project ChubaoFS not Longhorn in the previous email!
|
By
Alex Chircop
·
#3549
·
|
|
ChubaoFS Project - SIG Storage Feedback
I'd like to share the output of the SIG Storage process we followed for the project presentations we had regarding the ChubaoFS project.
Project Longhorn was discussed in detail at the SIG call of
I'd like to share the output of the SIG Storage process we followed for the project presentations we had regarding the ChubaoFS project.
Project Longhorn was discussed in detail at the SIG call of
|
By
Alex Chircop
·
#3548
·
|
|
Re: KubeVirt Sandbox Proposal - Next Steps
Indeed great :)
Now, I still wonder how we can proceed. I'm happy to bring this up on a TOC call again and discuss it there.
- fabian
Indeed great :)
Now, I still wonder how we can proceed. I'm happy to bring this up on a TOC call again and discuss it there.
- fabian
|
By
Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch@...>
·
#3547
·
|
|
Re: KubeVirt Sandbox Proposal - Next Steps
Hey Alexis,
sorry - these emails somehow slipped my eyes.
No, I have not soke up to all of the TOC members yet, but a few who I thought would be interested in the topic.
- fabian
Hey Alexis,
sorry - these emails somehow slipped my eyes.
No, I have not soke up to all of the TOC members yet, but a few who I thought would be interested in the topic.
- fabian
|
By
Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch@...>
·
#3546
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-sig-app-delivery] accelerated schedule for CNCF App Delivery SIG Charter & votes
Back to business today.
// Alois
From: <cncf-sig-app-delivery@...> on behalf of Quinton Hoole <quinton@...>
Date: Tuesday, 13. August 2019 at 01:11
To: alexis richardson <alexis@...>
Cc:
Back to business today.
// Alois
From: <cncf-sig-app-delivery@...> on behalf of Quinton Hoole <quinton@...>
Date: Tuesday, 13. August 2019 at 01:11
To: alexis richardson <alexis@...>
Cc:
|
By
Reitbauer, Alois <alois.reitbauer@...>
·
#3545
·
|
|
Proposed SIGs, September 3rd agenda item
As we move forward on App Delivery, it's now time to review our other upcoming SIGs.
https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/sigs/proposed.md has a list (that will shortly not include App Delivery).
As we move forward on App Delivery, it's now time to review our other upcoming SIGs.
https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/sigs/proposed.md has a list (that will shortly not include App Delivery).
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#3544
·
|
|
Re: Archived Project List Online - Timeframe?
Thank you! I missed it last time I looked (maybe I need new bifocals -LOL).
aimee
Thank you! I missed it last time I looked (maybe I need new bifocals -LOL).
aimee
|
By
Aimee Ukasick <aimeeu.opensource@...>
·
#3543
·
|
|
Re: Archived Project List Online - Timeframe?
It’s been done: https://www.cncf.io/archived-projects/
--
Dan Kohn <dan@...> +1-415-233-1000
Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation cncf.io
dankohn.com or book on my calendar:
It’s been done: https://www.cncf.io/archived-projects/
--
Dan Kohn <dan@...> +1-415-233-1000
Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation cncf.io
dankohn.com or book on my calendar:
|
By
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
·
#3542
·
|
|
Re: Archived Project List Online - Timeframe?
https://www.cncf.io/archived-projects/
https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/docs/projects.md#archived-projects
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
https://www.cncf.io/archived-projects/
https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/docs/projects.md#archived-projects
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#3541
·
|
|
Re: Archived Project List Online - Timeframe?
This is currently listed on the CNCF website: https://www.cncf.io/archived-projects/
--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager, CNCF | amye@...
This is currently listed on the CNCF website: https://www.cncf.io/archived-projects/
--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager, CNCF | amye@...
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#3540
·
|
|
Archived Project List Online - Timeframe?
Hi all - I read that as part of the CNCF Project Archiving process, the CNCF will list archived projects online. Now that rkt has been archived, what is the time frame for putting the list online and
Hi all - I read that as part of the CNCF Project Archiving process, the CNCF will list archived projects online. Now that rkt has been archived, what is the time frame for putting the list online and
|
By
Aimee Ukasick <aimeeu.opensource@...>
·
#3539
·
|
|
Re: KubeVirt Sandbox Proposal - Next Steps
Great! I am happy about that.--
Erin A. Boyd
Senior Principal Software Engineer, OCTO
Red Hat
Great! I am happy about that.--
Erin A. Boyd
Senior Principal Software Engineer, OCTO
Red Hat
|
By
Erin Boyd
·
#3538
·
|
|
Longhorn Project - SIG Storage Feedback
I'd like to share the output of the SIG Storage process we followed for the project presentations we had from Sheng regarding the Longhorn project.
Project Longhorn was discussed in detail at the SIG
I'd like to share the output of the SIG Storage process we followed for the project presentations we had from Sheng regarding the Longhorn project.
Project Longhorn was discussed in detail at the SIG
|
By
Alex Chircop
·
#3537
·
|
|
Re: KubeVirt Sandbox Proposal - Next Steps
The second one is better.
The one thing that the TOC want to avoid is "lobbying" in which projects get pre-rolled.
The second one is better.
The one thing that the TOC want to avoid is "lobbying" in which projects get pre-rolled.
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#3536
·
|
|
Re: KubeVirt Sandbox Proposal - Next Steps
Alexis,
This has long been an open question on process for me.
Should we be addressing each TOC member individually or should the formal presentation server as the "request for sponsorship from the
Alexis,
This has long been an open question on process for me.
Should we be addressing each TOC member individually or should the formal presentation server as the "request for sponsorship from the
|
By
Erin Boyd
·
#3535
·
|