|
Re: Serverless WG and the AppDelivery SIG
SGTM
By
alexis richardson
·
#3722
·
|
|
Re: Serverless WG and the AppDelivery SIG
Yes, although it probably makes most sense to house it under sig-apps if most of their attention is on the app dev part, rather than runtime infra. One of the sigs needs to carry the can for the wg.
Yes, although it probably makes most sense to house it under sig-apps if most of their attention is on the app dev part, rather than runtime infra. One of the sigs needs to carry the can for the wg.
|
By
Quinton Hoole <qhoole@...>
·
#3721
·
|
|
Re: Serverless WG and the AppDelivery SIG
so:
TOC
SIG-Apps & SIG-Runtime
WG-Serverless is a 'shared' WG between the 2 SIGs
?
so:
TOC
SIG-Apps & SIG-Runtime
WG-Serverless is a 'shared' WG between the 2 SIGs
?
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#3720
·
|
|
Re: Serverless WG and the AppDelivery SIG
I agee Liz
I think serverless app development falls under sig-apps, and serveless runtimes fall under sig-runtime.
It's pretty common for work groups to span across a few SIGs.
Q
I agee Liz
I think serverless app development falls under sig-apps, and serveless runtimes fall under sig-runtime.
It's pretty common for work groups to span across a few SIGs.
Q
|
By
Quinton Hoole <qhoole@...>
·
#3719
·
|
|
Re: Serverless WG and the AppDelivery SIG
Thanks for the reminder on this Joe.
The Serverless WG has already been performing that role of defining the landscape in their space, identifying gaps, writing white papers... The bit we’re missing
Thanks for the reminder on this Joe.
The Serverless WG has already been performing that role of defining the landscape in their space, identifying gaps, writing white papers... The bit we’re missing
|
By
Liz Rice
·
#3718
·
|
|
Re: Serverless WG and the AppDelivery SIG
Hey fellow TOC members – poke on this? Thoughts?
A couple of questions in my mind:
How does this relate to the proposed Runtime SIG?
Hey fellow TOC members – poke on this? Thoughts?
A couple of questions in my mind:
How does this relate to the proposed Runtime SIG?
|
By
Joe Beda <jbeda@...>
·
#3717
·
|
|
[RESULT] Jaeger graduation (APPROVED)
The Jaeger project has been approved to the graduated maturity level: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/171
+1 binding TOC votes (7/9):
Matt: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/3652
Alexis:
The Jaeger project has been approved to the graduated maturity level: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/171
+1 binding TOC votes (7/9):
Matt: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/3652
Alexis:
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#3716
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess graduation
+1 binding
Liz
On 25 Oct 2019, 09:57 +0100, Rabi, Abdel, Vodafone Group <abdel.rabi@...>, wrote:
+1 binding
Liz
On 25 Oct 2019, 09:57 +0100, Rabi, Abdel, Vodafone Group <abdel.rabi@...>, wrote:
|
By
Liz Rice
·
#3715
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess graduation
+1 nb
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Wednesday, 23 October 2019 at 14:44
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Vitess graduation
Vitess
+1 nb
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Wednesday, 23 October 2019 at 14:44
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Vitess graduation
Vitess
|
By
Rabi Abdel
·
#3714
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess graduation
+1 nb
L.
By
Leonardo Di Donato
·
#3713
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess graduation
+1 non-binding
By
Nick Chase
·
#3712
·
|
|
[RESULT] CloudEvents moving to incubation (APPROVED)
The CloudEvents project has been approved to the incubation maturity level from sandbox: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/297
+1 binding TOC votes (7/9):
Brendan Burns:
The CloudEvents project has been approved to the incubation maturity level from sandbox: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/297
+1 binding TOC votes (7/9):
Brendan Burns:
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#3711
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess graduation
+1 binding
Nicola Marco Decandia
Desotech S.r.l.
+1 binding
Nicola Marco Decandia
Desotech S.r.l.
|
By
Nicola Marco Decandia
·
#3710
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess graduation
+1 non-binding
Regards,
Philippe
+1 non-binding
Regards,
Philippe
|
By
Philippe Robin
·
#3709
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess graduation
+1 binding
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 at 6:44 AM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Vitess graduation
+1 binding
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 at 6:44 AM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Vitess graduation
|
By
Brewer, Jeff
·
#3708
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess graduation
+1 non-binding
By
Niraj Tolia
·
#3707
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess graduation
+1 nb
Best regards.
---
Pengfei Ni
刘海锋 via Lists.Cncf.Io <bjliuhaifeng=jd.com@...> 于2019年10月24日周四 上午9:10写道:
+1 nb
Best regards.
---
Pengfei Ni
刘海锋 via Lists.Cncf.Io <bjliuhaifeng=jd.com@...> 于2019年10月24日周四 上午9:10写道:
|
By
Pengfei Ni
·
#3706
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CloudEvents moving to incubation
+ 1 Non-Binding
-Sunny
DISCLAIMER - MSysTechnologies LLC
This email message, contents and its attachments may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information and is intended
+ 1 Non-Binding
-Sunny
DISCLAIMER - MSysTechnologies LLC
This email message, contents and its attachments may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information and is intended
|
By
Sunny Raskar <sunny.raskar@...>
·
#3705
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess graduation
+1 nb
--Haifeng
发件人:<cncf-toc@...>代表 Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
日期:2019年10月23日星期三下午9:44
收件人:CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
主题:[cncf-toc] [VOTE] Vitess
+1 nb
--Haifeng
发件人:<cncf-toc@...>代表 Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
日期:2019年10月23日星期三下午9:44
收件人:CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
主题:[cncf-toc] [VOTE] Vitess
|
By
刘海锋 <bjliuhaifeng@...>
·
#3704
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Vitess graduation
+1 binding
from Alimail iPhone
+1 binding
from Alimail iPhone
|
By
Li, Xiang
·
#3703
·
|