Please wait until Monday for us to publish the post as stated before, there will be a maintainer election policy put forth that was discussed at the last GB meeting and will be published to

As a maintainer, I would also appreciate this information. :) -- Jaice Singer DuMars Open Source Strategy, Open Source Programs Office +1 (206) 371-2293 345 Spear St., San Francisco CA 94105

While the GB and End User TAB have processes in place to create a list of nominees for which to vote on, the non-sandbox project maintainers do not. This is new for them. Can you please outline how

<caniszczyk@...> wrote: This is phrased as if all projects suggest one common nominee. Prometheus team understood the process to be that every project suggests a person and then all

+1 Great suggestion Matt. Best Regards, Shannon Williams Rancher Labs shannon@... +1 650-521-6902

The process is baked into the charter here (6)(e): https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/master/charter.md#6-technical-oversight-committee-toc I don't have a problem in publicizing the "Qualified

+1 I think this is an excellent suggestion

During this nomination cycle, is there any reason that we can't: Make all nominations public, with who / what org nominated the nominee. Some ability for a public comment period on the nominees. If

Thanks Chris!-- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

There will be 11 seats total: - 6 nominees from the Governing Board (GB) - 2 nominees from the End User Community (up from 1) - 1 nominee from the non-sandbox project maintainers (up from 0) - 2

Chris, Thanks for the blog post. Do we have numbers for how many people are eligible to cast votes in each "Selecting Group"? As i read it, just 3 of the seats (2 from EUC and 1 from non-sandbox) are

Hi Nicola - Thanks for your email. I do not believe there are however you are welcome to email the below email in case they have additional information. kcsp@... Best, Jessie -- Jessie Adams

We are working on a blog post, PR that should go out next week describing the election process, we will open nominations this month with results coming here:

Chris, Amye, et al With the TOC adding 2 seats, what do people do if they want to stand? More generally as we discussed at Kubecon, how are we making the TOC process more open & inclusive? alexis

Liz and Michelle, Thanks for putting this together. The first time I had to work on a good sized conference I wished someone had put something like this together. - Matt Farina

As ex-KC/CNC co-chairs, Michelle and I started talking about some things we wished we had known beforehand, and how we could start trying to pass these thoughts on down the chain of new co-chairs.

Hello everyone, there are some discount for KCSP or KTP for join to Kubecon of Amsterdam? Thank you for the answer. Have a good day.

It would be great if we could be tracking this effort on github... Chris A: do you think https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/248 is a good issue to add on to? I'm not if you intended for this to

Thanks Sarah. I added flow specifically for sandbox to this document as well to maybe fine grain out each flow for each

picking up this thread... I think it would help the community and SIGs work with the TOC if we align on a process and document it clearly. In an effort to foster discussion and drive toward publishing