+1 nb

+1 binding for me. Jrgg From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Joe Beda via Lists.Cncf.Io" <jbeda=vmware.com@...> Reply-To: "jbeda@..." <jbeda@...> Date: Thursday, December 12, 2019 at 8:20 PM To:

The maintainer seat is new, and that person will be representing the (incubating & grad) projects on the TOC. My recollection of the GB discussion on this is that requiring endorsement from

Yes! I have updated the FAQ to make it more clear who votes. I am happy to catch up with anyone who has questions in #elections, we'll be taking nominations until noon Pacific on December 20th, that's

Thanks Amye, this is a big improvement. Please can you socialise the URL as much as possible, and encourage applications / nominations / feedback?

That's a great addition, thank you. -- Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager, CNCF | amye@...

Amye, Can you please add another one for who votes in which category? GB - 5 seats, only current GB members vote (25 people vote per https://www.cncf.io/people/governing-board/?) End user community -

Based on feedback and questions (thank you!), we've posted an FAQ: https://www.cncf.io/blog/2019/12/13/faq-for-december-2019-toc-nominations/ Please feel free to keep giving feedback on this, we're

I'm not sure what's up or down after going through this today. Can someone capture all this in an easier to follow manner? I'd normally volunteer but, I'm behind on everything as it is. Chris

If I remember correctly (as I don't have a reference to point to), Joe is right that the GB and end user community do not need endorsements. Do we know of a reason the maintainers need endorsements

The explanation so far on this email is confusing to me also. One clarification on the summary Matt put together: my understanding is that the endorsements from other project maintainers is only for

Thanks so much. With all these clarifications would someone be willing to write down a Guide that lays out the steps as simply as possible? On one page, in a numbered sequence would be ideal. Then

I was sure that I had already voted on this (after doing the DD!) but I can't find the mail. So let's make it all official: +1 binding Joe

The qualification process is the same for all of the TOC nominees. -- Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager, CNCF | amye@...

This is a great question! In order to "stand", you need to self-nominate, get another maintainer to nominate you, get a GB member or end user member to nominate you. There are no prerequisites for

One thing is not entirely clear... The charter notes that: For the non-sandbox project maintainers the criteria that the person be a maintainer was publicly documented in the publicly documented

Another one that i saw in the charter was the section that says - "Qualification: After the Evaluation Period, the Governing Board and the TOC members shall vote on each nominee individually to

yes this helps can anyone stand? <amye@...> wrote:

1. If you want to stand, talk to: a) a governing board member, b) a member of the end-user community, or c) a maintainer for a graduated or incubating project. You can also nominate yourself if you

<amye@...> wrote: it's too complicated, sorry please can we avoid all processes that require in-person explanation, or in-slack, since these repel applicants