|
Re: Vote on SIG-Observability Charter
+1 nb
By
alexis richardson
·
#4472
·
|
|
Vote on SIG-Observability Charter
Folks,
As the ToC Liason, I'd like to call a vote on creating SIG-Observability.
You can find the relevant info here:
PR: https://github.com/cncf/sig-observability/pull/1
Pretty:
Folks,
As the ToC Liason, I'd like to call a vote on creating SIG-Observability.
You can find the relevant info here:
PR: https://github.com/cncf/sig-observability/pull/1
Pretty:
|
By
Brendan Burns
·
#4471
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-sig-observability] SIG Observability has a TOC Liaison!
I believe we can call a vote on the public mailing list by sending a mail to the main CNCF list.
I will do that now.
I believe we can call a vote on the public mailing list by sending a mail to the main CNCF list.
I will do that now.
|
By
Brendan Burns
·
#4470
·
|
|
Re: [Vote] Argo Project Proposal
+1, NB.
By
Steven Dake
·
#4469
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-sig-observability] SIG Observability has a TOC Liaison!
I think "next" is up to TOC's discretion, but "soon" sounds realistic.
I think "next" is up to TOC's discretion, but "soon" sounds realistic.
|
By
Richard Hartmann
·
#4468
·
|
|
Re: Helm Graduation public comment period
Reminding people that the public comment about Helm graduation is open, please add any comments about the
Helm graduation here.
Justin
Reminding people that the public comment about Helm graduation is open, please add any comments about the
Helm graduation here.
Justin
|
By
Justin Cormack
·
#4467
·
|
|
SIG Observability has a TOC Liaison!
Hello!
We're happy to announce that Brendan Burns has agreed to be the TOC Liaison for SIG Observability. That means...
The SIG Observability Charter is now ready for a vote!
PR:
Hello!
We're happy to announce that Brendan Burns has agreed to be the TOC Liaison for SIG Observability. That means...
The SIG Observability Charter is now ready for a vote!
PR:
|
By
Matt Young
·
#4466
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Dragonfly Incubation Vote
+1 binding
By
Michelle Noorali <michelle.noorali@...>
·
#4465
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Dragonfly Incubation Vote
+1 binding
If Dragonfly does indeed move to incubation, it would be great to have SIG Security do an assessment and give recommendations to the project (the related issue is currently marked
+1 binding
If Dragonfly does indeed move to incubation, it would be great to have SIG Security do an assessment and give recommendations to the project (the related issue is currently marked
|
By
Liz Rice
·
#4464
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] GB-TOC joint meeting
Kris, that's not the way the organization works by design which is covered well in this blog post: https://www.cncf.io/blog/2019/12/06/cncf-toc-governance-structure-elections-2020/ and there is legal
Kris, that's not the way the organization works by design which is covered well in this blog post: https://www.cncf.io/blog/2019/12/06/cncf-toc-governance-structure-elections-2020/ and there is legal
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#4463
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] GB-TOC joint meeting
Kris, I will bring up the issue of potentially offering abridged minutes or opening a part of the meeting:
https://github.com/cncf/foundation/issues/82
You have an opportunity to run for the GB in the
Kris, I will bring up the issue of potentially offering abridged minutes or opening a part of the meeting:
https://github.com/cncf/foundation/issues/82
You have an opportunity to run for the GB in the
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#4462
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] GB-TOC joint meeting
Yeah I see that you documented hiding the GB meetings - but can we open this up? This is an open-source foundation after all - and given the state of the world right now it might be wise to encourage
Yeah I see that you documented hiding the GB meetings - but can we open this up? This is an open-source foundation after all - and given the state of the world right now it might be wise to encourage
|
By
Kris Nova <kris.nova@...>
·
#4461
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] GB-TOC joint meeting
An idea might be to keep the option of having a few topics stay private. The TOC found this much easier to share thoughts candidly at times and hence form a collective view quickly. At the same time
An idea might be to keep the option of having a few topics stay private. The TOC found this much easier to share thoughts candidly at times and hence form a collective view quickly. At the same time
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#4460
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] GB-TOC joint meeting
The CNCF GB meetings are private to the GB only: https://www.cncf.io/people/governing-board/ as End User Meetings are only for End User community: https://www.cncf.io/people/end-user-community/
Here's
The CNCF GB meetings are private to the GB only: https://www.cncf.io/people/governing-board/ as End User Meetings are only for End User community: https://www.cncf.io/people/end-user-community/
Here's
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#4459
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] GB-TOC joint meeting
Any way we can share them? I would be interested in seeing what happens there. --
Kris Nova
Chief Open Source Advocate
85 2nd Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
nova@...
Any way we can share them? I would be interested in seeing what happens there. --
Kris Nova
Chief Open Source Advocate
85 2nd Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
nova@...
|
By
Kris Nova <kris.nova@...>
·
#4458
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] GB-TOC joint meeting
Hi,
I am unable to access those slides. Can we please share?
--
Kris Nova
Chief Open Source Advocate
85 2nd Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
nova@...
Hi,
I am unable to access those slides. Can we please share?
--
Kris Nova
Chief Open Source Advocate
85 2nd Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
nova@...
|
By
Kris Nova <kris.nova@...>
·
#4457
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] GB-TOC joint meeting
Apologies, those GB slides aren't public, but Liz's TOC slides are:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xhuwdKfkh1ROGk_JE6n0mf9xHOWKNFeKeRFGFirHHoY
--
Dan Kohn <dan@...> +1-415-233-1000
Executive
Apologies, those GB slides aren't public, but Liz's TOC slides are:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xhuwdKfkh1ROGk_JE6n0mf9xHOWKNFeKeRFGFirHHoY
--
Dan Kohn <dan@...> +1-415-233-1000
Executive
|
By
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
·
#4456
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] GB-TOC joint meeting
Thanks, Alexis.
-g
Ginger Collison | NATS Community & Ecosystem
ginger@...
www.nats.io
Maintained by the good people of Synadia Communications, Inc.
Thanks, Alexis.
-g
Ginger Collison | NATS Community & Ecosystem
ginger@...
www.nats.io
Maintained by the good people of Synadia Communications, Inc.
|
By
Ginger Collison
·
#4455
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] GB-TOC joint meeting
Please can I put in a word for Nats, and its backers. I think many
others are in a similar situation or could be.
Some projects have a core that is driven by a single vendor (ISV). We
need to make
Please can I put in a word for Nats, and its backers. I think many
others are in a similar situation or could be.
Some projects have a core that is driven by a single vendor (ISV). We
need to make
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#4454
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] GB-TOC joint meeting
Thanks. Added as slides 127-128 of https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1JnK8XKxFV2xQJT_fumzUedLhscP-w0CZ-Qs8URjbCG4/.
--
Dan Kohn <dan@...> +1-415-233-1000
Executive Director, Cloud Native
Thanks. Added as slides 127-128 of https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1JnK8XKxFV2xQJT_fumzUedLhscP-w0CZ-Qs8URjbCG4/.
--
Dan Kohn <dan@...> +1-415-233-1000
Executive Director, Cloud Native
|
By
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
·
#4453
·
|