|
Re: An interesting issue wrt CLA
Bots can have delegated authority to sign things on behalf of their makers. It seems like it would be even more important for this kind of a bot to have a signature since if it was compromised or
|
Bots can have delegated authority to sign things on behalf of their makers. It seems like it would be even more important for this kind of a bot to have a signature since if it was compromised or
|
By
Sarah Allen
·
#4043
·
|
|
An interesting issue wrt CLA
Folks,
See:
https://github.com/kubernetes-client/javascript/pull/384
Dependabot is automatically generating a PR to update vulnerable dependencies, but of course the CNCF CLA is required, and
|
Folks,
See:
https://github.com/kubernetes-client/javascript/pull/384
Dependabot is automatically generating a PR to update vulnerable dependencies, but of course the CNCF CLA is required, and
|
By
Brendan Burns
·
#4042
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 NB
--Kiran Mova | Co-Founder, Chief Architect MayaData | kiran.mova@...
https://github.com/openebs/openebs
|
+1 NB
--Kiran Mova | Co-Founder, Chief Architect MayaData | kiran.mova@...
https://github.com/openebs/openebs
|
By
Kiran Mova
·
#4041
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 (nb)
Cheers,
Michael
--
Developer Advocate @ AWS
+353 86 0215164
Amazon Data Services Ireland Limited registered office: One Burlington Plaza, Burlington Road, Dublin 4, Ireland. Registered
|
+1 (nb)
Cheers,
Michael
--
Developer Advocate @ AWS
+353 86 0215164
Amazon Data Services Ireland Limited registered office: One Burlington Plaza, Burlington Road, Dublin 4, Ireland. Registered
|
By
Hausenblas, Michael
·
#4040
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 binding
from Alimail iPhone
|
+1 binding
from Alimail iPhone
|
By
Li, Xiang
·
#4039
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1, binding
--brendan
By
Brendan Burns
·
#4038
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
CNCF SIGs should not affect Kubernetes SIGs.
|
CNCF SIGs should not affect Kubernetes SIGs.
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#4037
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 binding
By
Brian Grant
·
#4036
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 nb
By
Haining Zhang
·
#4035
·
|
|
[RESULT] SIG Network (Approved)
The CNCF Network SIG has been approved:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/317
Binding: 6/9
Matt Klein: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/3757
alexis richardson:
|
The CNCF Network SIG has been approved:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/317
Binding: 6/9
Matt Klein: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/3757
alexis richardson:
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#4034
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
Xu,
AFAIK, k8s sig-node should remain as it is. Part of this group's focus would be working with sig-node so that runtimes can interface with k8s. For example, having a particular runtime implement
|
Xu,
AFAIK, k8s sig-node should remain as it is. Part of this group's focus would be working with sig-node so that runtimes can interface with k8s. For example, having a particular runtime implement
|
By
Ricardo Aravena
·
#4033
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 binding (on the assumption the minor details in the PR get addressed)
--
Liz Rice
@lizrice | lizrice.com | +44 (0) 780 126 1145
|
+1 binding (on the assumption the minor details in the PR get addressed)
--
Liz Rice
@lizrice | lizrice.com | +44 (0) 780 126 1145
|
By
Liz Rice
·
#4032
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 nb
Best regards.
---
Pengfei Ni
Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> 于2020年1月7日周二 上午5:39写道：
|
+1 nb
Best regards.
---
Pengfei Ni
Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> 于2020年1月7日周二 上午5:39写道：
|
By
Pengfei Ni
·
#4031
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 nb
Rabi
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Philippe Robin <Philippe.Robin@...>
Date: Tuesday, 7 January 2020 at 10:18
To: "ascavarda@..." <ascavarda@...>, CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: Re:
|
+1 nb
Rabi
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Philippe Robin <Philippe.Robin@...>
Date: Tuesday, 7 January 2020 at 10:18
To: "ascavarda@..." <ascavarda@...>, CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: Re:
|
By
Rabi Abdel
·
#4030
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 nb
Philippe
By
Philippe Robin
·
#4029
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 non-binding!
By
Nikhita Raghunath
·
#4028
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 nb
--
L.
By
Leonardo Di Donato
·
#4027
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 nb.
And one question: How will the SIG-Runtime work affect Kubernetes SIG-Node?
|
+1 nb.
And one question: How will the SIG-Runtime work affect Kubernetes SIG-Node?
|
By
Xu Wang
·
#4026
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 NB
Thanks & Regards,
Siddharth Bhadri
Software Engineer
Infoblox | Next Level Networking
sbhadri@... | www.infoblox.com
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Mark Peek via
|
+1 NB
Thanks & Regards,
Siddharth Bhadri
Software Engineer
Infoblox | Next Level Networking
sbhadri@... | www.infoblox.com
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Mark Peek via
|
By
Siddharth Bhadri
·
#4025
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SIG Runtime
+1 non-binding
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Amye Scavarda Perrin via Lists.Cncf.Io" <ascavarda=linuxfoundation.org@...>
Reply-To: "ascavarda@..." <ascavarda@...>
Date: Monday, January 6, 2020
|
+1 non-binding
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Amye Scavarda Perrin via Lists.Cncf.Io" <ascavarda=linuxfoundation.org@...>
Reply-To: "ascavarda@..." <ascavarda@...>
Date: Monday, January 6, 2020
|
By
Mark Peek
·
#4024
·
|
