With my SIG o11y chair hat on: I am 100% endorsing moving Cortex to incubation.

With my SIG o11y chair hat on: I am 100% endorsing moving Thanos to incubation.

+1 NB

Hello, Cortex has applied to move to the suite of incubation projects: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/315. I am the TOC sponsor for Cortex (further comments here), and after completing the DD, I

Big +1 (NB) from me!

+1 NB

+1 NB -- Oleg Chornyi, CTO ventuscloud.eu

Matt Young and Richard Hartman of SIG Observability have nominated Bartłomiej Płotka as Tech Lead. https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/4592 Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this

Absolutely! +1

Folks The issue we are facing here is how to make projects, and hence the cncf, sustainable. As Quinton pointed out this requires incentives. Marketing buzz is short lived and sponsors will move on

The template is a great idea, and we'd like to borrow that from Alexis' draft. We're creating a templates repo that projects can clone if they want to use our templates for the various requirements,

As an observer, I think this is a very solid analysis and recommendation. The risk of a "rubber stamp" steering committee is a serious concern, and clearly doesn't resolve the underlying challenge of

KubeEdge has applied for promotion from Sandbox to Incubation level: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/461 With the completion of KubeEdge Due Diligence and SIG Runtime recommendation, I'm opening the

As promised, we had an in-depth discussion of the Steering Committee proposal drafted by Alexis Richardson for the July 7th TOC meeting during the Governance WG meeting. Six members were present

+1, sounds like a logical thing to do. -alena.

Operator Framework SDK and OLM sub-projects have applied to join as incubating projects (https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/303). +1 Binding: *note: Quorum is 10 as Jeff Brewer has been away* Katie

+1 NB - sounds good! --Kiran Mova | Co-Founder, Chief Architect MayaData | kiran.mova@... https://github.com/openebs/openebs

+1

Nice idea, and very well written doc. I can't help thinking that it might promote excess and undesirable bureaucracy though, unless quite carefully scoped. Anecdotally, the most common failure modes

Agreed - makes sense. We should also merge the new sandbox proposal process into main workflow doc too: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/project_proposals.adoc Thanks, Alex