+1 NB

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding. Thanks.

The TiKV project has applied for promotion to "Graduated" (see https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/414). Saad Ali is the TOC sponsor and has called for the vote at the end of the public comment period.

On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 02:33 PM, Saad Ali wrote: as completed the migration of the pd repo from PingCap to the TiKV org. See https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/414#issuecomment-674704044I spoke with

The TiKV team was very responsive, and has completed the migration of the pd repo from PingCap to the TiKV org. See https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/414#issuecomment-674704044 PTAL

+1 NB

The artifact hub already has a "real" use case. That is to make it easier to discover cloud native artifacts for those end-users who consume them. These artifacts are often distributed and hosted all

I wonder, whether this is the right timing to discuss running a dedicated registry for CNCF projects. The CNCF is already working on the arfifact hub project. This could be the first real use case

Dear all, +1, NB Thank you, Tina ^ ^ IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify

+1 binding

+1 binding

+1 binding I would like to bring the end-user perspective to the discussion. At this stage, there are different requirements to operate a k8s cluster and some teams and companies are using k3s (due to

+1 binding

+1 binding

In general, CNCF hasn't paid for infrastructure, so I think if we were going to do something like that, we should talk about it generally. However, in this case, as was noted, I think the effect is

+1, binding.

+1, binding.

Adding to this, sccording to the faq, inactive images are defined as images that have not been pulled or pushed in at least 6 months. This could still break things, but shouldn't be too disruptive for

+1, binding.