Finally reviewing the TiKV graduation application. Mostly it looks great to me but has there been any discussion of TiKV's dependency on https://github.com/pingcap/pd? I’m not familiar with PD so

I can speak to some of this... The CNCF describes projects in terms of crossing the chasm. You can find that here. Sandbox is labeled as being for the innovators. A production recommendation really

sandbox projects are early stage / experimental and where we want to enable neutral collaboration. There is no DD so we are not giving any recommendations (Including not recommending for production).

To me, this does not feel like either of those two upstream projects. Characterizing k3s as packaging only or tooling used to manage Kubernetes is not addressing: The forking issue, e.g. not using

I expect there are many people in this thread that lack some context. So, I figured I'd try to add some. If someone has more to add or a correction please do so. These are intermixed with some of my

+1 (binding)

+100 NB. Great! Q

I don't think it needs to be accepted as a sandbox project. 1. What is the purpose of acceptance? 2. What is the difference between it and k8s? Finally, sandbox should not be abused. -1 정철

+1 non-binding Thank you, Acornsoft, Alex 2020년 8월 7일 (금) 오후 11:02, Jimmy Song <jimmysong@...>님이 작성:

Dear all, +1, NB. Thank you, Tina Tsou Enterprise Architect Arm tina.tsou@... +1 (408)931-3833

+1 non-binding. I've been on a bit of a pseudo-vacation. Not sure votes are all tallied and done (e.g. status of this vote) or still being gathered. My positive sentiment nonetheless. Best, Jim

+1 non-binding

+1 NB

+1 binding

+1 nb Kevin Wang

+1 non-binding

+1 (non-binding)

+1 non-binding

+1 (non-binding)

+1 nb