cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Topics Expanded Polls

Export Group Data

Between

and

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

+1 non-binding Jimmy Song https://jimmysong.io

By Jimmy Song <jimmysong@...> · #5119 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

+1 binding k3s has made it clear that it is not a fork and that is not the road it is going down. It is a distro, and I feel that distros are valuable work in open source, with many examples. The

By Justin Cormack · #5118 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

I'm probably jumping into the conversation uninformed and without context. I just want to make it very clear k3s is in no way shape or form a fork. There is nothing technically correct about calling

By Darren Shepherd <darren@...> · #5117 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

+1, binding.

By Brendan Burns · #5116 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

Per Bob's point 3, k3s want a neutral home for further experimentation and collaboration; in my opinion it is undoubtedly cloud native, and it solves a particular problem in a way that lots of folks

By Liz Rice · #5115 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

K3s is a distro, and it is a fork as well. The "opinionated" description always applies to distros (which can be more or less opinionated, of course). If the opinion included things like backported

By Bob Wise · #5114 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

Abstain Unfortunately I missed the "Joint CNCF TOC/Kubernetes Steering Committee" meeting. But I talked to some folks afterwards to fill me in. Overall, I'd like to avoid setting precedent that a

By Saad Ali · #5113 ·

Re: [VOTE] TiKV Graduation

+1, NB

By Liu Tang · #5112 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

+1 nb From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Phil Estes via lists.cncf.io" <estesp=gmail.com@...> Reply to: "estesp@..." <estesp@...> Date: Friday, 31. July 2020 at 17:13 To: "cncf-toc@..."

By Reitbauer, Alois · #5111 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

+1 binding On Aug 2, 2020 12:13 AM, "Liz Rice via lists.cncf.io" <liz=lizrice.com@...> wrote: +1 binding On Sat, 1 Aug 2020 at 09:22, Richard Hartmann <richih@...> wrote:

By Sheng Liang <sheng@...> · #5110 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

+1 binding

By Liz Rice · #5109 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

+1 NB 发自 WPS邮箱客戶端在 Mofei Zhang <mofei2816@...>，2020年8月1日 19:34写道：

By wuheng · #5108 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

+1 NB Mofei Zhang Architect , JD.com Maintainer , ChubaoFS

By Mofei Zhang · #5107 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

+1 NB I see it as a learning tool, which has merit in and as of itself. Similar to how Cortex and Thanos help shape the future for Prometheus, k3s can act as a canonical proving ground of sorts

By Richard Hartmann · #5106 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

+1 nb I appreciate that the TOC took the time to talk with the Kubernetes Steering Committee prior to calling for a vote. I can't imagine a vote moving forward without their blessing. It's great that

By Matt Farina · #5105 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

Big fan of k3s! +1 NB -- Christian Posta twitter: @christianposta http://blog.christianposta.com

By Christian Posta · #5104 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

+1 binding I think this is an opportunity for us to create forums/feedback loops and improve communication between distribution like projects and core projects where it makes sense. If Kind or

By Michelle Noorali <michelle.noorali@...> · #5103 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

Currently k3s is a distro of k8s. We used to have a k8s sandbox. If we still did then k3s would happily live there as a way to show k8s how to be a better project.

By alexis richardson · #5102 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

+1 nb

By Gou Rao <grao@...> · #5101 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

k3s is not a fork of Kubernetes. It is an opinionated way of delivering Kubernetes to IoT and Edge devices. Talking to Kubernetes steering committee made it clear that Kubernetes main design principle

By Alena Prokharchyk · #5100 ·

2881 - 2900 of 7995

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms