cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Topics Expanded Polls

Export Group Data

Between

and

Re: [VOTE] Rook Graduation

+1 Binding

By Saad Ali · #5159 ·

Re: [VOTE] TiKV Graduation

The TOC discussed the concerns around the PD dependency this morning. Given Liu's indication that the library could be migrated to the TiKV project, let's go ahead and do that. Liu, can you please

By Saad Ali · #5158 ·

Re: [VOTE] Tech Lead nomination for SIG Observability: Bartłomiej Płotka

+1 binding

By Michelle Noorali <michelle.noorali@...> · #5157 ·

Re: [VOTE] TiKV Graduation

Thanks TOC for raising this concern. I am Tang Liu, and I am speaking here both as a TiKV maintainer and a member of the broader eco-system & community. It’s true that Placement Driver is an

By Liu Tang · #5156 ·

Re: [VOTE] TiKV Graduation

It is described as "Placement driver for TiKV" and TiKV appears to have a strong dependency on it so perhaps pd should be considered part of TiKV? We should ask TiKV maintainers about this.

By Frederick Kautz · #5155 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

The chasm statement is interesting in the abstract. The well-deserved implication is “production use” is far to broad a term for a huge variety of situations, and I withdraw the question. Has the

By Bob Wise (AWS) · #5154 ·

Re: [VOTE] TiKV Graduation

Hi Liz, We may have missed this. I can take a look and get back to you asap. Thanks, Erin

By Erin Boyd · #5153 ·

Re: [VOTE] TiKV Graduation

Finally reviewing the TiKV graduation application. Mostly it looks great to me but has there been any discussion of TiKV's dependency on https://github.com/pingcap/pd? I’m not familiar with PD so

By Liz Rice · #5152 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

I can speak to some of this... The CNCF describes projects in terms of crossing the chasm. You can find that here. Sandbox is labeled as being for the innovators. A production recommendation really

By Matt Farina · #5151 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

sandbox projects are early stage / experimental and where we want to enable neutral collaboration. There is no DD so we are not giving any recommendations (Including not recommending for production).

By Liz Rice · #5150 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

To me, this does not feel like either of those two upstream projects. Characterizing k3s as packaging only or tooling used to manage Kubernetes is not addressing: The forking issue, e.g. not using

By Bob Wise (AWS) · #5149 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

I expect there are many people in this thread that lack some context. So, I figured I'd try to add some. If someone has more to add or a correction please do so. These are intermixed with some of my

By Matt Farina · #5148 ·

Re: [VOTE] Thanos for Incubation

+1 (binding)

By Justin Cormack · #5147 ·

Re: [VOTE] Tech Lead nomination for SIG Observability: Bartłomiej Płotka

+100 NB. Great! Q

By Quinton Hoole <quinton@...> · #5146 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

I don't think it needs to be accepted as a sandbox project. 1. What is the purpose of acceptance? 2. What is the difference between it and k8s? Finally, sandbox should not be abused. -1 정철

By es Zou · #5145 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

+1 non-binding Thank you, Acornsoft, Alex 2020년 8월 7일 (금) 오후 11:02, Jimmy Song <jimmysong@...>님이 작성:

By ivy@... · #5144 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

Dear all, +1, NB. Thank you, Tina Tsou Enterprise Architect Arm tina.tsou@... +1 (408)931-3833

By Tina Tsou · #5143 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

+1 non-binding. I've been on a bit of a pseudo-vacation. Not sure votes are all tallied and done (e.g. status of this vote) or still being gathered. My positive sentiment nonetheless. Best, Jim

By St Leger, Jim · #5142 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

+1 non-binding

By Jimmy Song <jimmysong@...> · #5141 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

+1 NB

By Dax McDonald · #5140 ·

2841 - 2860 of 7995

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms