|
Re: sig contributor strategy charter ready for vote
+1 binding
By
Brian Grant
·
#4351
·
|
|
Re: sig contributor strategy charter ready for vote
+1 nb woo super excited to help with this!
+1 nb woo super excited to help with this!
|
By
Gerred Dillon
·
#4350
·
|
|
Re: sig contributor strategy charter ready for vote
+1 binding. Very excited to see this start up!
+1 binding. Very excited to see this start up!
|
By
Matt Klein
·
#4349
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] Point of process
Brian,
I read something different in the snippets you shared that may be worth talking about. Just for a different perspective.
This is a link into a service that runs as a cronjob. It's designed to
Brian,
I read something different in the snippets you shared that may be worth talking about. Just for a different perspective.
This is a link into a service that runs as a cronjob. It's designed to
|
By
Matt Farina
·
#4348
·
|
|
Re: sig contributor strategy charter ready for vote
+1 (nb)
Thanks!
Ricardo
By
Ricardo Aravena
·
#4347
·
|
|
Re: sig contributor strategy charter ready for vote
+1 nb
Ken Owens
Vice President
Software Development Engineering
Mastercard
+1 nb
Ken Owens
Vice President
Software Development Engineering
Mastercard
|
By
Owens, Ken
·
#4346
·
|
|
Re: sig contributor strategy charter ready for vote
+1 nb
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Michelle Noorali <michelle.noorali@...>
Date: Friday, March 13, 2020 at 8:22 AM
To: <kiran.mova@...>
Cc: Stephen Augustus <Stephen@...>, Paris Pittman
+1 nb
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Michelle Noorali <michelle.noorali@...>
Date: Friday, March 13, 2020 at 8:22 AM
To: <kiran.mova@...>
Cc: Stephen Augustus <Stephen@...>, Paris Pittman
|
By
Jon Mittelhauser
·
#4345
·
|
|
Re: sig contributor strategy charter ready for vote
+1 non-binding
By
Alena Prokharchyk
·
#4344
·
|
|
Re: sig contributor strategy charter ready for vote
+1 binding
Looks great. Thank you!
+1 binding
Looks great. Thank you!
|
By
Michelle Noorali <michelle.noorali@...>
·
#4343
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] Point of process
The CNCF Hub looks very Helm-specific and not obviously extensible, so it's not clear to me how it intends to accomplish
The CNCF Hub looks very Helm-specific and not obviously extensible, so it's not clear to me how it intends to accomplish
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#4342
·
|
|
Re: sig contributor strategy charter ready for vote
+1 non-binding
By
Xing Yang
·
#4341
·
|
|
Re: sig contributor strategy charter ready for vote
+1 (binding)
Justin
By
Justin Cormack
·
#4340
·
|
|
Re: sig contributor strategy charter ready for vote
+1 binding from me, thank you!
--
Liz Rice
@lizrice | lizrice.com | +44 (0) 780 126 1145
+1 binding from me, thank you!
--
Liz Rice
@lizrice | lizrice.com | +44 (0) 780 126 1145
|
By
Liz Rice
·
#4339
·
|
|
Re: sig contributor strategy charter ready for vote
+1 (nb), thanks Paris and all.
+1 (nb), thanks Paris and all.
|
By
Ihor Dvoretskyi
·
#4338
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] Point of process
Pitching in here,
I think most would agree that ideally tools and projects need to be shared openly from their conception.
However, I think from the usability point of view we also want to have a
Pitching in here,
I think most would agree that ideally tools and projects need to be shared openly from their conception.
However, I think from the usability point of view we also want to have a
|
By
Ricardo Aravena
·
#4337
·
|
|
Re: sig contributor strategy charter ready for vote
+1 non-binding
--Kiran Mova | Co-Founder, Chief Architect MayaData | kiran.mova@...
https://github.com/openebs/openebs
+1 non-binding
--Kiran Mova | Co-Founder, Chief Architect MayaData | kiran.mova@...
https://github.com/openebs/openebs
|
By
Kiran Mova
·
#4336
·
|
|
Re: sig contributor strategy charter ready for vote
+1 NB!!
Looking forward to this!! :)
+1 NB!!
Looking forward to this!! :)
|
By
Stephen Augustus
·
#4335
·
|
|
sig contributor strategy charter ready for vote
Hi TOC:
We are ready for a vote. I know many of you gave +1s when we initially proposed this with the last iteration of TOC, but we are now ready for the final vote with the new crew.
Hi TOC:
We are ready for a vote. I know many of you gave +1s when we initially proposed this with the last iteration of TOC, but we are now ready for the final vote with the new crew.
|
By
Paris Pittman <parispittman@...>
·
#4334
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] Point of process
All of these discussion got me thinking about a few things. I figured I'd share.
First, I agree this should have been done in the open from the start. While I didn't run the show and I did ask for
All of these discussion got me thinking about a few things. I figured I'd share.
First, I agree this should have been done in the open from the start. While I didn't run the show and I did ask for
|
By
Matt Farina
·
#4333
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] Point of process
100% agree with encouraging diversity and not being king makers.
However, I also think that applies within projects, not just between projects.
I want to make sure that we adopt tools that encourage
100% agree with encouraging diversity and not being king makers.
However, I also think that applies within projects, not just between projects.
I want to make sure that we adopt tools that encourage
|
By
Brendan Burns
·
#4332
·
|