|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] CNCF position on new Docker policy limiting image retention
I wonder, whether this is the right timing to discuss running a dedicated registry for CNCF projects.
The CNCF is already working on the arfifact hub project. This could be the first real use case
I wonder, whether this is the right timing to discuss running a dedicated registry for CNCF projects.
The CNCF is already working on the arfifact hub project. This could be the first real use case
|
By
Reitbauer, Alois
·
#5176
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook Graduation
Dear all,
+1, NB
Thank you,
Tina ^ ^
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
Dear all,
+1, NB
Thank you,
Tina ^ ^
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
|
By
Tina Tsou
·
#5175
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook Graduation
+1 binding
By
Liz Rice
·
#5174
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Cortex for Incubation
+1 binding
By
Michelle Noorali <michelle.noorali@...>
·
#5173
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox
+1 binding
I would like to bring the end-user perspective to the discussion. At this stage, there are different requirements to operate a k8s cluster and some teams and companies are using k3s (due to
+1 binding
I would like to bring the end-user perspective to the discussion. At this stage, there are different requirements to operate a k8s cluster and some teams and companies are using k3s (due to
|
By
Katie Gamanji
·
#5172
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Cortex for Incubation
+1 binding
By
Liz Rice
·
#5171
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Thanos for Incubation
+1 binding
By
Michelle Noorali <michelle.noorali@...>
·
#5170
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] CNCF position on new Docker policy limiting image retention
In general, CNCF hasn't paid for infrastructure, so I think if we were going to do something like that, we should talk about it generally.
However, in this case, as was noted, I think the effect is
In general, CNCF hasn't paid for infrastructure, so I think if we were going to do something like that, we should talk about it generally.
However, in this case, as was noted, I think the effect is
|
By
Brendan Burns
·
#5169
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Tech Lead nomination for SIG Observability: Bartłomiej Płotka
+1, binding.
From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...>On Behalf Of Brendan Burns via lists.cncf.io
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2020 10:02 AM
To: Quinton Hoole <quinton@...>; michelle.noorali@...
Cc: Amye
+1, binding.
From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...>On Behalf Of Brendan Burns via lists.cncf.io
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2020 10:02 AM
To: Quinton Hoole <quinton@...>; michelle.noorali@...
Cc: Amye
|
By
Nayak, Mahesh Manjunath (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
·
#5168
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Cortex for Incubation
+1, binding.
From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Bartłomiej Płotka via lists.cncf.io <bwplotka=gmail.com@...>
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 8:26 AM
To: sheng@... <sheng@...>
Cc: x.li@...
+1, binding.
From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Bartłomiej Płotka via lists.cncf.io <bwplotka=gmail.com@...>
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2020 8:26 AM
To: sheng@... <sheng@...>
Cc: x.li@...
|
By
Brendan Burns
·
#5167
·
|
|
Re: CNCF position on new Docker policy limiting image retention
Adding to this, sccording to the faq, inactive images are defined as images that have not been pulled or pushed in at least 6 months.
This could still break things, but shouldn't be too disruptive for
Adding to this, sccording to the faq, inactive images are defined as images that have not been pulled or pushed in at least 6 months.
This could still break things, but shouldn't be too disruptive for
|
By
Frederick Kautz
·
#5166
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Tech Lead nomination for SIG Observability: Bartłomiej Płotka
+1, binding.
From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Michelle Noorali via lists.cncf.io <michelle.noorali=gmail.com@...>
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2020 8:20 AM
To: Quinton Hoole
+1, binding.
From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Michelle Noorali via lists.cncf.io <michelle.noorali=gmail.com@...>
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2020 8:20 AM
To: Quinton Hoole
|
By
Brendan Burns
·
#5165
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Thanos for Incubation
+1 binding
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Justin Cormack via lists.cncf.io" <justin.cormack=docker.com@...>
Reply-To: "justin.cormack@..." <justin.cormack@...>
Date: Monday, August 10, 2020 at
+1 binding
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Justin Cormack via lists.cncf.io" <justin.cormack=docker.com@...>
Reply-To: "justin.cormack@..." <justin.cormack@...>
Date: Monday, August 10, 2020 at
|
By
Sheng Liang <sheng@...>
·
#5164
·
|
|
Re: CNCF position on new Docker policy limiting image retention
I think the FAQ states that only the inactive images will be scheduled for deletion.
https://www.docker.com/pricing/retentionfaq
What will happen to inactive images once the expiration date is
I think the FAQ states that only the inactive images will be scheduled for deletion.
https://www.docker.com/pricing/retentionfaq
What will happen to inactive images once the expiration date is
|
By
saiyam pathak
·
#5163
·
|
|
Re: CNCF position on new Docker policy limiting image retention
This is more of a question for CNCF Staff than the TOC :)
I moved the issue here: https://github.com/cncf/foundation/issues/106
I haven't fully read the policy yet to understand the impact but we are
This is more of a question for CNCF Staff than the TOC :)
I moved the issue here: https://github.com/cncf/foundation/issues/106
I haven't fully read the policy yet to understand the impact but we are
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#5162
·
|
|
CNCF position on new Docker policy limiting image retention
Starting Nov 1, 2020, Docker is planning to limit retention of images on Docker Hub for free accounts to 6m [1]. This will likely affect many CNCF projects that distribute binaries. For example, while
Starting Nov 1, 2020, Docker is planning to limit retention of images on Docker Hub for free accounts to 6m [1]. This will likely affect many CNCF projects that distribute binaries. For example, while
|
By
Yuri Shkuro
·
#5161
·
|
|
Re: k3s sandbox proposal
Hi everyone,
Per the TOC's recommendation, the K3s team has updated our README.md to include a roadmap and some other information that hopefully helps clarify what K3s is and isn't. We appreciate the
Hi everyone,
Per the TOC's recommendation, the K3s team has updated our README.md to include a roadmap and some other information that hopefully helps clarify what K3s is and isn't. We appreciate the
|
By
craig@...
·
#5160
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook Graduation
+1 Binding
By
Saad Ali
·
#5159
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] TiKV Graduation
The TOC discussed the concerns around the PD dependency this morning. Given Liu's indication that the library could be migrated to the TiKV project, let's go ahead and do that. Liu, can you please
The TOC discussed the concerns around the PD dependency this morning. Given Liu's indication that the library could be migrated to the TiKV project, let's go ahead and do that. Liu, can you please
|
By
Saad Ali
·
#5158
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Tech Lead nomination for SIG Observability: Bartłomiej Płotka
+1 binding
By
Michelle Noorali <michelle.noorali@...>
·
#5157
·
|