cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Re: [URGENT] Impending deletion of Helm 2 releases and charts buckets

From what I have been told, it's not technically possible to transfer the project. To add some context about cost and history... We have seen numbers on what it would cost to host these through Google

By Matt Farina · #5419 ·

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [URGENT] Impending deletion of Helm 2 releases and charts buckets

All we need from Google is for them to redirect the chart repository domain name to a new location. That is the only thing that is currently causing the high-probability risk of the chart repositories

By Matt Butcher <Matt.Butcher@...> · #5418 ·

Re: [URGENT] Impending deletion of Helm 2 releases and charts buckets

My question is: is the *Helm project* asking for the CNCF to fund extended storage for these charts, or not? (assuming this is technically possible). I can see why the answer might be "not"; we have

By Josh Berkus · #5417 ·

Re: [URGENT] Impending deletion of Helm 2 releases and charts buckets

Josh, You ask a good question. There are two things worth noting... Many of the charts people use have been slower to move out of the stable and incubator repos than expected. We are still finding

By Matt Farina · #5416 ·

Re: [URGENT] Impending deletion of Helm 2 releases and charts buckets

All, I'm really unclear on why CNCF would devote resources to maintaining a set of outdated Helm charts if the Helm project itself has decided not to do so. Wouldn't it be more sensible for us to

By Josh Berkus · #5415 ·

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [URGENT] Impending deletion of Helm 2 releases and charts buckets

+MattButcher --brendan

By Brendan Burns · #5414 ·

Re: [URGENT] Impending deletion of Helm 2 releases and charts buckets

This has been an issue since at least April 2019. The deprecation message is not getting through.

By Brian Grant · #5413 ·

Re: [URGENT] Impending deletion of Helm 2 releases and charts buckets

Thanks Chris. Just noting that we do have the Special Issues process where $$$ are involved to take technical budget issues to the GB, though it sounds unlikely that this would be an affordable item

By Liz Rice · #5412 ·

Re: [URGENT] Impending deletion of Helm 2 releases and charts buckets

It would be great to have input from the current Helm maintainers on their issue and public deprecation plan here. +Matt Farina Also, this is a big budget item and will likely involve the GB, where

By Chris Aniszczyk · #5411 ·

Re: [URGENT] Impending deletion of Helm 2 releases and charts buckets

The affected charts are mainly the ones in the official community repo: https://github.com/helm/charts There is a notice in the README. PRs to the charts are still being merged, though at a lower

By Brian Grant · #5410 ·

Re: [URGENT] Impending deletion of Helm 2 releases and charts buckets

It does seem like a hard cut-off is going to hurt people without some further action. I can see two ways the CNCF might be able to help: - Getting the word out. I suspect that a lot of Helm chart

By Liz Rice · #5409 ·

Re: [URGENT] Impending deletion of Helm 2 releases and charts buckets

I would recommend setting up a URL forwarding from old repos to new repos, so that charts are maintained at new locations but old URL references continue to work. Thanks, -Arvind

By Arvind Gupta · #5408 ·

[URGENT] Impending deletion of Helm 2 releases and charts buckets

TOC Folks, I want to bring https://github.com/helm/community/issues/114 to your attention. This has the potential for causing a lot of pain to users. The buckets are scheduled to be deleted on Nov 13,

By Saad Ali · #5407 ·

Re: [VOTE] Buildpacks to move to incubation

+1 binding -- ~Dave

By Dave Zolotusky · #5406 ·

Cloud native "reference/demo" application

I am using this list as it most likely reaches the widest audience in the CNCF. In recent discussions in the app delivery SIG we came to the conclusion that a reference application would make

By Reitbauer, Alois · #5405 ·

Re: [VOTE] Buildpacks to move to incubation

+1 NB. As the lead reviewer for the upcoming sig-security assessment, the project appears to have done a fair amount of due diligence from a precursory look at the prepared draft. Andres

By Andrés Vega · #5404 ·

Re: [VOTE] Buildpacks to move to incubation

+1 nb

By Kevin Wang · #5403 ·

Re: [VOTE] Open Policy Agent from incubating to graduated

+1 NB

By Archy k · #5402 ·

Re: [VOTE] Open Policy Agent from incubating to graduated

+1 nb From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Sheng Liang via lists.cncf.io" <sheng=rancher.com@...> Reply-To: <sheng@...> Date: Thursday, October 8, 2020 at 2:00 PM To: "aprokharchyk@..."

By Jon Mittelhauser · #5401 ·

Re: [VOTE] Open Policy Agent from incubating to graduated

+1 binding From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Alena Prokharchyk via lists.cncf.io" <aprokharchyk=apple.com@...> Reply-To: "aprokharchyk@..." <aprokharchyk@...> Date: Thursday, October 8, 2020 at

By Sheng Liang <sheng@...> · #5400 ·

2581 - 2600 of 7995

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms