cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Topics Expanded Polls

Export Group Data

Between

and

Re: [VOTE] Open Policy Agent from incubating to graduated

+1 NB Barak Stout

By Barak Stout · #5620 ·

Re: [VOTE] Open Policy Agent from incubating to graduated

+1 non binding -- Bhaarat Sharma Raft | CTO M. 703-708-4463 Schedule a meeting (Calendly) bsharma@... SBA 8(a) Certified | WOSB

By Bhaarat Sharma · #5619 ·

Re: [VOTE] Open Policy Agent from incubating to graduated

+1 binding

By Michelle Noorali · #5618 ·

Re: Projects included into Sandbox from the 1/26 sandbox review meeting

It's https://github.com/docker/distribution They will pick a new org name and so on. -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra)

By Chris Aniszczyk · #5617 ·

Re: Projects included into Sandbox from the 1/26 sandbox review meeting

Hi all, Does anyone have details on what “Distribution” is? That is a super generic name and the linked issue doesn’t have any pointers to other resources to orient me. Joe

By Joe Beda <jbeda@...> · #5616 ·

Projects included into Sandbox from the 1/26 sandbox review meeting

The TOC has reviewed the projects that have applied to be included in Sandbox, see the results below. Our next Sandbox review meeting is March 23, 2021. GitOps Working Group passes with a majority

By Amye Scavarda Perrin · #5615 ·

[TOC Election] Qualified Nominees for January/February 2021 Election

Congratulations to our nominees for the Technical Oversight Committee! These nominees have all passed the qualification process from the Governing Board and TOC. Ricardo Aravena John Belamaric Erin

By Amye Scavarda Perrin · #5614 ·

Re: Apologies

I will have to skip as well. Please let me know where I can help. Michelle

By Michelle Noorali <michelle.noorali@...> · #5613 ·

Re: Apologies

I have as well, apologies too. Justin

By Justin Cormack · #5612 ·

Apologies

Sorry folks, I've got a conflict for tomorrow's TOC meeting, and I will have to skip this one Liz

By Liz Rice · #5611 ·

Re: [EXTERNAL] [cncf-toc] What do we mean by “Version 1.0”?

I think that's the heart of the confusion / expectation that I'm seeing. (Or even more precisely that anything under v1.0 is seen by many as not production-ready.) Ack that not every project sees it

By Liz Rice · #5610 ·

Re: [EXTERNAL] [cncf-toc] What do we mean by “Version 1.0”?

if CNCF wants to help, then publish some guidelines. Or, people will just do their own thing.

By alexis richardson · #5609 ·

Re: [EXTERNAL] [cncf-toc] What do we mean by “Version 1.0”?

Let's face it. Most uses of x.y.z aren't SemVer and most people haven't read the spec :) I think something about graduated projects having a documented policy around versioning is probably

By Gareth Rushgrove · #5608 ·

Re: [VOTE] Open Policy Agent from incubating to graduated

+1 nb 💜 Kind Regards, Bartek Płotka (@bwplotka)

By Bartłomiej Płotka · #5607 ·

Re: [VOTE] Open Policy Agent from incubating to graduated

+1 binding Justin

By Justin Cormack · #5606 ·

Re: [EXTERNAL] [cncf-toc] What do we mean by “Version 1.0”?

I agree that it should be about setting the bar for the release management, API backwards compatibility, clearly defined versioning scheme and communications around it in Gradulation requirements.

By Alena Prokharchyk · #5605 ·

Re: [EXTERNAL] [cncf-toc] What do we mean by “Version 1.0”?

I think there is some nuance in here but it's worth discussing. For example, if a project is using SemVer there are a couple parts of the spec that come to mind... If a project doesn't have a 1.0.0

By Matt Farina · #5604 ·

Re: [EXTERNAL] [cncf-toc] What do we mean by “Version 1.0”?

IMO, everyone's using version numbers in different ways now. For example many projects go to 1.0 once they are feature complete, and hit production way before that. I think insisting on 1.0 for

By alexis richardson · #5603 ·

Re: [EXTERNAL] [cncf-toc] What do we mean by “Version 1.0”?

I'm not convinced that in people's minds, or practically, v1.0 and Graduated mean similar things. As a concrete example, Kubernetes went to v 1.0 several years before it graduated. In my mind,

By Quinton Hoole <quinton@...> · #5602 ·

Re: [EXTERNAL] [cncf-toc] What do we mean by “Version 1.0”?

+1 imo a graduated project should have some documented backward compatibility guarantees and semantic versioning helps denote this. It has been a best practice on all the projects I've worked on. I'd

By Michelle Noorali · #5601 ·

2381 - 2400 of 7995

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms