|
|
Re: [VOTE] Flux for incubation
+1 non-binding
By
Thomas Schuetz
·
#5693
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Flux for incubation
+1 nb
Eran J. Leib Founder, VP Product Management
Apolicy.IO, Inc.p: +1-669-246-2592w: www.apolicy.ioe: eran@...
|
+1 nb
Eran J. Leib Founder, VP Product Management
Apolicy.IO, Inc.p: +1-669-246-2592w: www.apolicy.ioe: eran@...
|
By
Eran Leib
·
#5692
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Flux for incubation
+1 non-binding.
Completely agree with Joe's sentiments, the composability of the v2 toolkit is incredibly flexible.
|
+1 non-binding.
Completely agree with Joe's sentiments, the composability of the v2 toolkit is incredibly flexible.
|
By
Pete Birley
·
#5691
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Flux for incubation
+1 non-binding
By
Kunal Parmar <kunal@...>
·
#5690
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Flux for incubation
+1 NB
By
kensipe
·
#5689
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Flux for incubation
+1 ,
GitOps is the Way
Banu A Parasuraman
Chief Technologist – Cloud Native
+1-734-9287788
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Toni Menzel via lists.cncf.io"
|
+1 ,
GitOps is the Way
Banu A Parasuraman
Chief Technologist – Cloud Native
+1-734-9287788
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Toni Menzel via lists.cncf.io"
|
By
banu.parasuraman@wipro.com
·
#5688
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Flux for incubation
+1 non-binding. Go GitOps! ;)
Toni Menzel
rebaze GmbH | Develop Like Tomorrow
Developer focused Technology Consulting & Cloud Native Infrastructure.
rebaze GmbH | +49 171 65 202 84 | toni.menzel@...
|
+1 non-binding. Go GitOps! ;)
Toni Menzel
rebaze GmbH | Develop Like Tomorrow
Developer focused Technology Consulting & Cloud Native Infrastructure.
rebaze GmbH | +49 171 65 202 84 | toni.menzel@...
|
By
Toni Menzel
·
#5687
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Flux for incubation
+1 binding.
By
Justin Cormack
·
#5686
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Flux for incubation
+1 NB
By
Ken Owens
·
#5685
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Flux for incubation
+1 binding
From:cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Amye Scavarda Perrin via lists.cncf.io <ascavarda=linuxfoundation.org@...>
Date: Friday, February 19, 2021 at 10:41 AM
To: CNCF TOC
|
+1 binding
From:cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Amye Scavarda Perrin via lists.cncf.io <ascavarda=linuxfoundation.org@...>
Date: Friday, February 19, 2021 at 10:41 AM
To: CNCF TOC
|
By
Sheng Liang <sheng.liang@...>
·
#5684
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Flux for incubation
+1 nb
By
Jeff Billimek
·
#5683
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Flux for incubation
+1 binding
By
Michelle Noorali <michelle.noorali@...>
·
#5682
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Flux for incubation
+1 Non-binding.
I’m really excited by the “toolkit” approach that is part of flux2. That, for me, makes this much more useful in many more situations.
Joe
From:cncf-toc@...
|
+1 Non-binding.
I’m really excited by the “toolkit” approach that is part of flux2. That, for me, makes this much more useful in many more situations.
Joe
From:cncf-toc@...
|
By
Joe Beda <jbeda@...>
·
#5681
·
|
|
[VOTE] Flux for incubation
The Flux project has applied to move from sandbox to incubation: (https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/567)
The due diligence document can be found here:
|
The Flux project has applied to move from sandbox to incubation: (https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/567)
The due diligence document can be found here:
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#5680
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-flux-maintainers] [cncf-toc] Flux for Incubation Public Comment Period
Sounds great. We're ready to call for a vote then if you'll do the honors @Amye.
Thanks all.
|
Sounds great. We're ready to call for a vote then if you'll do the honors @Amye.
Thanks all.
|
By
Michelle Noorali <michelle.noorali@...>
·
#5679
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-flux-maintainers] [cncf-toc] Flux for Incubation Public Comment Period
Thanks Michael, Daniel & Stefan for your responses - this all seems reasonable to me so you can consider my comments resolved :-)
|
Thanks Michael, Daniel & Stefan for your responses - this all seems reasonable to me so you can consider my comments resolved :-)
|
By
Liz Rice
·
#5678
·
|
|
KEDA Annual Review
Dear CNCF TOC,
We are happy to share that the annual review for KEDA is open on https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/607.
Kind regards,
Tom Kerkhove
Microsoft Azure MVP & Advisor - GitHub Star – CNCF
|
Dear CNCF TOC,
We are happy to share that the annual review for KEDA is open on https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/607.
Kind regards,
Tom Kerkhove
Microsoft Azure MVP & Advisor - GitHub Star – CNCF
|
By
Tom Kerkhove
·
#5677
·
|
|
Vote - renaming CNCF SIGs to TAGs
In this week's meeting we talked about renaming CNCF SIGs to TAGs (Technical Advisory Group) to avoid confusion with the pre-existing Kubernetes SIGs. As discussed, the current confusion is real,
|
In this week's meeting we talked about renaming CNCF SIGs to TAGs (Technical Advisory Group) to avoid confusion with the pre-existing Kubernetes SIGs. As discussed, the current confusion is real,
|
By
Liz Rice
·
#5676
·
|
|
Re: security & CNCF projects
Not on the TOC, so hope it's ok to comment.
I have the same concerns as Liz, quite often metrics are gathered without all factors considered.
Take kubernetes for example, huge code base, huge user
|
Not on the TOC, so hope it's ok to comment.
I have the same concerns as Liz, quite often metrics are gathered without all factors considered.
Take kubernetes for example, huge code base, huge user
|
By
Luke A Hinds <lhinds@...>
·
#5675
·
|
|
Re: security & CNCF projects
thanks Liz
this is a *terrific resource* that costs lots of money & time, and it is useless if we don't make it public and prune out old stuff
|
thanks Liz
this is a *terrific resource* that costs lots of money & time, and it is useless if we don't make it public and prune out old stuff
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#5674
·
|
