+ 1 NB

+1 NB -- Andy Snowden Engineering Manager, DevOps (917) 423-7045 EquityZen *We're Hiring!* Please refer to this page for important disclosures regarding this electronic communication.

+1 NB --Kiran Mova | Co-Founder, Chief Architect MayaData | kiran.mova@... https://github.com/openebs/openebs

+1 non-binding vote

+1 NB

+1 non-binding

I think as the CNCF was formed its vision was to guide an end user ecosystem and to assist projects to navigate and gain acceptance with the end users. For the end users, they look to the CNCF for

With my SIG o11y chair hat on: I am 100% endorsing moving Cortex to incubation.

With my SIG o11y chair hat on: I am 100% endorsing moving Thanos to incubation.

+1 NB

Hello, Cortex has applied to move to the suite of incubation projects: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/315. I am the TOC sponsor for Cortex (further comments here), and after completing the DD, I

Big +1 (NB) from me!

+1 NB

+1 NB -- Oleg Chornyi, CTO ventuscloud.eu

Matt Young and Richard Hartman of SIG Observability have nominated Bartłomiej Płotka as Tech Lead. https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/4592 Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this

Absolutely! +1

Folks The issue we are facing here is how to make projects, and hence the cncf, sustainable. As Quinton pointed out this requires incentives. Marketing buzz is short lived and sponsors will move on

The template is a great idea, and we'd like to borrow that from Alexis' draft. We're creating a templates repo that projects can clone if they want to use our templates for the various requirements,

As an observer, I think this is a very solid analysis and recommendation. The risk of a "rubber stamp" steering committee is a serious concern, and clearly doesn't resolve the underlying challenge of

KubeEdge has applied for promotion from Sandbox to Incubation level: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/461 With the completion of KubeEdge Due Diligence and SIG Runtime recommendation, I'm opening the