|
Re: Incubation discussion
I agree with the rationale and you captured it very accurately, thank you.
I agree with the rationale and you captured it very accurately, thank you.
|
By
Solomon Hykes <solomon.hykes@...>
·
#141
·
|
|
Re: Incubation discussion
That would be a bad outcome that should act as an incentive to exit Incubation positively.
Factors like this mitigate in favour of keeping things simple. Eg we could set ourselves a goal of getting
That would be a bad outcome that should act as an incentive to exit Incubation positively.
Factors like this mitigate in favour of keeping things simple. Eg we could set ourselves a goal of getting
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#142
·
|
|
Re: prometheus
+1
By
Solomon Hykes <solomon.hykes@...>
·
#143
·
|
|
Re: prometheus
-1
Prometheus is a fine system but it is certainly not the only only one out there. Sysdig, for example, is also open source and covers much of the same ground. My down vote is not about Prometheus
-1
Prometheus is a fine system but it is certainly not the only only one out there. Sysdig, for example, is also open source and covers much of the same ground. My down vote is not about Prometheus
|
By
John Lawler <jlawler@...>
·
#144
·
|
|
Re: prometheus
If we're going to figure out the proposal process, we need a proposal to start with, IMO.
This thread is merely an expression of interest in a proposal. We don't know whether the project is
If we're going to figure out the proposal process, we need a proposal to start with, IMO.
This thread is merely an expression of interest in a proposal. We don't know whether the project is
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#145
·
|
|
Re: prometheus
* Brian Grant via cncf-toc (cncf-toc@...) wrote:
yes
* Brian Grant via cncf-toc (cncf-toc@...) wrote:
yes
|
By
Chris Wright
·
#146
·
|
|
Re: prometheus
RE: process & incubation.
Sorry to come in late.? My experience is that community may consider graduation from incubation as assured.? I agree that it's intended to be a "maybe" but
RE: process & incubation.
Sorry to come in late.? My experience is that community may consider graduation from incubation as assured.? I agree that it's intended to be a "maybe" but
|
By
Rob Hirschfeld
·
#147
·
|
|
Re: prometheus
Great point - worth pursuing on the Incubation thread.
Great point - worth pursuing on the Incubation thread.
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#148
·
|
|
Re: prometheus
+1
By
Camille Fournier
·
#149
·
|
|
Prometheus proposal for CNCF
All,
I am delighted to sponsor the Prometheus project for adoption in CNCF.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/12j3WeWJVrvB0O0I8JDsAsl9ARoCcI-VR2aFN8_-HT9s/edit?usp=sharing
TOC,
Please take a look at
All,
I am delighted to sponsor the Prometheus project for adoption in CNCF.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/12j3WeWJVrvB0O0I8JDsAsl9ARoCcI-VR2aFN8_-HT9s/edit?usp=sharing
TOC,
Please take a look at
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#150
·
|
|
draft slides for TOC meeting tomorrow
simple agenda this week :-)
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1LvMHQn2MYapjMrjNHw6tWbxOnYFNrqvigZfVt1YkTFU/edit?ts=57152601#slide=id.g1102b59596_0_45
simple agenda this week :-)
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1LvMHQn2MYapjMrjNHw6tWbxOnYFNrqvigZfVt1YkTFU/edit?ts=57152601#slide=id.g1102b59596_0_45
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#151
·
|
|
FW: [oci-members] Reminder: Submit a talk for ContainerCon/ContainerCon Japan!
Team,
I would like to submit a panel proposal to Containercon on What is the CNCF and What we plan to accomplish.
Anyone interested in being on the Panel?
Kenneth Owens
CTO
Cisco
Team,
I would like to submit a panel proposal to Containercon on What is the CNCF and What we plan to accomplish.
Anyone interested in being on the Panel?
Kenneth Owens
CTO
Cisco
|
By
Kenneth Owens (kenowens) <kenowens@...>
·
#152
·
|
|
CNI discussion - actions
All,
Issues I heard today:
1. would be good to talk about some fundamental assumptions about what we think about standards (which is part of the OCI mandate) - suggest we involve the GB in this.
All,
Issues I heard today:
1. would be good to talk about some fundamental assumptions about what we think about standards (which is part of the OCI mandate) - suggest we involve the GB in this.
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#153
·
|
|
Discuss/Vote: CNCF Working Groups
Here's the proposal PR for WGs in CNCF:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/6
The actual simple process:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/add-working-group-process/process/working_groups.adoc
The first
Here's the proposal PR for WGs in CNCF:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/6
The actual simple process:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/add-working-group-process/process/working_groups.adoc
The first
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#154
·
|
|
TOC call: this week & next week
Hi all,
I am going to be on a plane during next week's TOC call. Please could a TOC member volunteer to chair the call next week?
Thank-you all for the call yesterday. I wanted to say that I'm
Hi all,
I am going to be on a plane during next week's TOC call. Please could a TOC member volunteer to chair the call next week?
Thank-you all for the call yesterday. I wanted to say that I'm
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#155
·
|
|
an interesting read, about "Cloud Native"
Hi all,
Not too long ago Joe Beda wrote an interesting doc about "Cloud Native". I have his permission to share it, and so I am posting a URL below.
I bring this to your attention because it may
Hi all,
Not too long ago Joe Beda wrote an interesting doc about "Cloud Native". I have his permission to share it, and so I am posting a URL below.
I bring this to your attention because it may
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#156
·
|
|
Re: CNI discussion - actions
Hi,
I’m one of the maintainers of CNI. I was on the CNCF call yesterday
during which understood only TOC members should state their opinion, so
I decided to just listen and write down my thoughts
Hi,
I’m one of the maintainers of CNI. I was on the CNCF call yesterday
during which understood only TOC members should state their opinion, so
I decided to just listen and write down my thoughts
|
By
Stefan Junker <stefan.junker@...>
·
#157
·
|
|
CNI discussion - actions
re: topic "A" - acceptable CNCF projects
IMO the CNCF should allow a variety of types of projects. Ranging from ones that are pure "code" to ones that are just "specifications". While pure spec
re: topic "A" - acceptable CNCF projects
IMO the CNCF should allow a variety of types of projects. Ranging from ones that are pure "code" to ones that are just "specifications". While pure spec
|
By
Doug Davis <dug@...>
·
#158
·
|
|
Re: CNI discussion - actions
On top of what Doug said, I'd like to remind the TOC on what's in the charter currently around projects (section 9):
https://cncf.io/governance
9. CNCF Projects
(a) It is expected that member
On top of what Doug said, I'd like to remind the TOC on what's in the charter currently around projects (section 9):
https://cncf.io/governance
9. CNCF Projects
(a) It is expected that member
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#159
·
|
|
Re: CNI discussion - actions
Doug
I think the main worry is "ex ante and de jure standards", i.e.:
- created ahead of real adoption & maturation of use cases
- by a legislature with wide authority
I know that Craig liked to say
Doug
I think the main worry is "ex ante and de jure standards", i.e.:
- created ahead of real adoption & maturation of use cases
- by a legislature with wide authority
I know that Craig liked to say
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#160
·
|