I agree with the rationale and you captured it very accurately, thank you.

That would be a bad outcome that should act as an incentive to exit Incubation positively. Factors like this mitigate in favour of keeping things simple. Eg we could set ourselves a goal of getting

+1

-1 Prometheus is a fine system but it is certainly not the only only one out there. Sysdig, for example, is also open source and covers much of the same ground. My down vote is not about Prometheus

If we're going to figure out the proposal process, we need a proposal to start with, IMO. This thread is merely an expression of interest in a proposal. We don't know whether the project is

* Brian Grant via cncf-toc (cncf-toc@...) wrote: yes

RE: process & incubation. Sorry to come in late.? My experience is that community may consider graduation from incubation as assured.? I agree that it's intended to be a "maybe" but

Great point - worth pursuing on the Incubation thread.

+1

All, I am delighted to sponsor the Prometheus project for adoption in CNCF. https://docs.google.com/document/d/12j3WeWJVrvB0O0I8JDsAsl9ARoCcI-VR2aFN8_-HT9s/edit?usp=sharing TOC, Please take a look at

simple agenda this week :-) https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1LvMHQn2MYapjMrjNHw6tWbxOnYFNrqvigZfVt1YkTFU/edit?ts=57152601#slide=id.g1102b59596_0_45

Team, I would like to submit a panel proposal to Containercon on What is the CNCF and What we plan to accomplish. Anyone interested in being on the Panel? Kenneth Owens CTO Cisco

All, Issues I heard today: 1. would be good to talk about some fundamental assumptions about what we think about standards (which is part of the OCI mandate) - suggest we involve the GB in this.

Here's the proposal PR for WGs in CNCF: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/6 The actual simple process: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/add-working-group-process/process/working_groups.adoc The first

Hi all, I am going to be on a plane during next week's TOC call. Please could a TOC member volunteer to chair the call next week? Thank-you all for the call yesterday. I wanted to say that I'm

Hi all, Not too long ago Joe Beda wrote an interesting doc about "Cloud Native". I have his permission to share it, and so I am posting a URL below. I bring this to your attention because it may

Hi, I’m one of the maintainers of CNI. I was on the CNCF call yesterday during which understood only TOC members should state their opinion, so I decided to just listen and write down my thoughts

re: topic "A" - acceptable CNCF projects IMO the CNCF should allow a variety of types of projects. Ranging from ones that are pure "code" to ones that are just "specifications". While pure spec

On top of what Doug said, I'd like to remind the TOC on what's in the charter currently around projects (section 9): https://cncf.io/governance 9. CNCF Projects (a) It is expected that member

Doug I think the main worry is "ex ante and de jure standards", i.e.: - created ahead of real adoption & maturation of use cases - by a legislature with wide authority I know that Craig liked to say