cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Topics Expanded Polls

Export Group Data

Between

and

Re: [Update] CNCF Networking Workgroup

Please add me as well: axbaretto@...

By Alex Baretto · #935 ·

Re: [Update] CNCF Networking Workgroup

Can I get an invite too please. I opened a PR to get added but wasn't sure if that was an old way of signing up. thanks -Doug _______________________________________________________ STSM | IBM Open

By Doug Davis <dug@...> · #934 ·

Serverless WG formation

+1! Iron.io (IronFunctions) would love to be involved: https://github.com/iron-io/functions

By Dylan Stamat <dylan@...> · #933 ·

CNCF & BV Panel & Reception, Monday, May 22, 4:30 to 7:30 PM

Please join me Monday afternoon! Open Source Software Fuels Explosive Growth and Startup Join Cloud Native Computing Foundation and Battery Ventures for an

By Dan Kohn <dan@...> · #932 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)

+1 (non binding)

By Dustin Kirkland <dustin.kirkland@...> · #931 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)

By Camille Fournier · #930 ·

Re: Serverless WG formation

+1 Mark From: <cncf-toc-bounces@...> on behalf of "Kenneth Owens (kenowens) via cncf-toc" <cncf-toc@...> Reply-To: "Kenneth Owens (kenowens)" <kenowens@...> Date: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 9:06

By Mark Peek · #929 ·

Re: Serverless WG formation

Ken, I would join for iguazio, we have high-perf “serverless” framework for internal use and will soon open-source it Seems like there is a consensus that serverless function portability

By Yaron Haviv · #928 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)

By Brian Grant · #927 ·

Re: prior docs about vitess

thanks Sugu - that is helpful. If we are going to ask Kyle if he could 'do a jepsen', it would be very good to understand which consistency choices should be tested.

By alexis richardson · #925 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)

By Jonathan Boulle <jonathan.boulle@...> · #924 ·

Re: Serverless WG formation

I would like to participate. Thanks.

By Tim Uckun <timuckun@...> · #923 ·

Re: Serverless WG formation

+1 This is great! Hyper.sh also built hyper func fully based on Kubernetes, and cooperating with IBM Whisk. Hope to be involved in the new WG! --- Harry

By Harry Zhang <harryz@...> · #926 ·

Re: Serverless WG formation

I will participate for Huawei and actively contribute to this effort. As I presented today, my key interest is consistent and portable user-facing configuration (event, function, event-function

By Cathy Zhang <Cathy.H.Zhang@...> · #922 ·

Re: prior docs about vitess

Vitess offers different transaction modes and isolation levels as described here: http://vitess.io/user-guide/twopc.html#isolation. The choice depends on what an application can tolerate. In case of

By Sugu Sougoumarane · #921 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)

+1 (non-binding) -- Craig Peters | Director of Product Management | www.scalr.com m: +1 925 639 0804 e: craig@... | skype: craig.l.peters

By Craig Peters <craig@...> · #920 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)

+1 (non-binding)

By Thangavelu, Kapil · #919 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)

+1 (non-binding).

By Ihor Dvoretskyi · #918 ·

Re: prior docs about vitess

This transition: X --> scalable X, suggests we are seeing parallel evolutions of each category X. If so then we can ask what properties of X are preserved. Atomicity and durability only?

By alexis richardson · #917 ·

Re: prior docs about vitess

Again, the main value as I see it is that Vitess facilitates a transition from MySQL to a more scalable implementation (scalable enough for Youtube), without taking so big a leap as NoSQL. Sugu

By Brian Grant · #916 ·

7061 - 7080 of 7995

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms