cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Topics Expanded Polls

Export Group Data

Between

and

Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)

By Brian Grant · #927 ·

Re: prior docs about vitess

thanks Sugu - that is helpful. If we are going to ask Kyle if he could 'do a jepsen', it would be very good to understand which consistency choices should be tested.

By alexis richardson · #925 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)

By Jonathan Boulle <jonathan.boulle@...> · #924 ·

Re: Serverless WG formation

I would like to participate. Thanks.

By Tim Uckun <timuckun@...> · #923 ·

Re: Serverless WG formation

+1 This is great! Hyper.sh also built hyper func fully based on Kubernetes, and cooperating with IBM Whisk. Hope to be involved in the new WG! --- Harry

By Harry Zhang <harryz@...> · #926 ·

Re: Serverless WG formation

I will participate for Huawei and actively contribute to this effort. As I presented today, my key interest is consistent and portable user-facing configuration (event, function, event-function

By Cathy Zhang <Cathy.H.Zhang@...> · #922 ·

Re: prior docs about vitess

Vitess offers different transaction modes and isolation levels as described here: http://vitess.io/user-guide/twopc.html#isolation. The choice depends on what an application can tolerate. In case of

By Sugu Sougoumarane · #921 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)

+1 (non-binding) -- Craig Peters | Director of Product Management | www.scalr.com m: +1 925 639 0804 e: craig@... | skype: craig.l.peters

By Craig Peters <craig@...> · #920 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)

+1 (non-binding)

By Thangavelu, Kapil · #919 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)

+1 (non-binding).

By Ihor Dvoretskyi · #918 ·

Re: prior docs about vitess

This transition: X --> scalable X, suggests we are seeing parallel evolutions of each category X. If so then we can ask what properties of X are preserved. Atomicity and durability only?

By alexis richardson · #917 ·

Re: prior docs about vitess

Again, the main value as I see it is that Vitess facilitates a transition from MySQL to a more scalable implementation (scalable enough for Youtube), without taking so big a leap as NoSQL. Sugu

By Brian Grant · #916 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)

+1! -- Benjamin Hindman Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos Mesosphere Inc. Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere

By Benjamin Hindman · #915 ·

Re: Serverless WG formation

a +1 here is sufficient for now Justin if you support the WG creation, here are the concrete goals for the proposed serverless WG atm: Provide clarity for ourselves and consumers w.r.t. what this

By Chris Aniszczyk · #914 ·

Re: Serverless WG formation

I agree this would be a useful group in the cncf but also have concerns discussed in earlier calls about being too early on trying to standardize a solution and possibly limit an evolving technology

By Justin Garrison <justinleegarrison@...> · #913 ·

Re: Serverless WG formation

As I mentioned on the call, IBM as a key participant in Open Whisk will be there. -Doug Sent from my iPhone

By Doug Davis <dug@...> · #912 ·

Re: Serverless WG formation

Hi Ken, Very interested! Please add me in. Thanks, Ying

By Ying Huang <Ying.Huang@...> · #911 ·

Re: Serverless WG formation

Kubeless will participate -sebastien https://github.com/bitnami/kubeless -- Sebastien Goasguen Senior Director of Cloud Technologies, Bitnami +41 79 367 38 25 @sebgoa Run your favorite apps in

By Sebastien Goasguen <sebgoa@...> · #910 ·

Re: Serverless WG formation

Ken Can you solicit some oss projects to get involved? Is that doable? Please let us know! A

By alexis richardson · #909 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)

+1 non-binding -- Jong Choi VP, NCSOFT jongchoi@... _____________________________

By Jong Choi · #908 ·

7081 - 7100 of 8007

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms