I will participate for Huawei and actively contribute to this effort. As I presented today, my key interest is consistent and portable user-facing configuration (event, function, event-function

Vitess offers different transaction modes and isolation levels as described here: http://vitess.io/user-guide/twopc.html#isolation. The choice depends on what an application can tolerate. In case of

+1 (non-binding) -- Craig Peters | Director of Product Management | www.scalr.com m: +1 925 639 0804 e: craig@... | skype: craig.l.peters

+1 (non-binding)

+1 (non-binding).

This transition: X --> scalable X, suggests we are seeing parallel evolutions of each category X. If so then we can ask what properties of X are preserved. Atomicity and durability only?

Again, the main value as I see it is that Vitess facilitates a transition from MySQL to a more scalable implementation (scalable enough for Youtube), without taking so big a leap as NoSQL. Sugu

+1! -- Benjamin Hindman Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos Mesosphere Inc. Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere

a +1 here is sufficient for now Justin if you support the WG creation, here are the concrete goals for the proposed serverless WG atm: Provide clarity for ourselves and consumers w.r.t. what this

I agree this would be a useful group in the cncf but also have concerns discussed in earlier calls about being too early on trying to standardize a solution and possibly limit an evolving technology

As I mentioned on the call, IBM as a key participant in Open Whisk will be there. -Doug Sent from my iPhone

Hi Ken, Very interested! Please add me in. Thanks, Ying

Kubeless will participate -sebastien https://github.com/bitnami/kubeless -- Sebastien Goasguen Senior Director of Cloud Technologies, Bitnami +41 79 367 38 25 @sebgoa Run your favorite apps in

Ken Can you solicit some oss projects to get involved? Is that doable? Please let us know! A

+1 non-binding -- Jong Choi VP, NCSOFT jongchoi@... _____________________________

thanks Ken, I'd like to participate as well for Google Cloud Function, with a particular interest for portable container environment, standard events, etc Cheers //A -- Antonio Gulli | Site Lead &&

Thanks Ken, Chiming in for Fission.io -- I'd like to participate too, and we're especially interested in function portability across different serverless platforms, and standardization around event

I agree and will participate. As an aside, I consider our definition of "Cloud Native” being container-packaged, too limiting. - Lee

Today on the TOC call we discussed starting a Serverless workgroup and I agreed to chair said workgroup. There was no disagreement on the call but many TOC members were not present. Please respond

+1 non-binding -- +31 652134960 CEO www.implicit-explicit.com Co-Founder www.softwarecircus.io Marketing Chair www.cncf.io