cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

I am happy to share something about this proposal: https://docs.google.com/document/d/16sCYq5EcB9_NFmnjtQ6WYmQ6tmt6CxYzsDL2ibrqPK8/edit#heading=h.lecnlkp0qpeq I shared it via wg-ci some week ago, in

By Gianluca Arbezzano <gianarb92@...> · #835 ·

Re: Agenda for TOC 4/19/17 Meeting

With my apologies for the late notice, I'm unable to make the call this morning due to a meeting that I can't move; talk to you in two weeks. - Bryan

By Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...> · #834 ·

Re: Agenda for TOC 4/19/17 Meeting

The doc hasn't really been touched in a while so we might have all the reviews/comments we're going to get. I did a little bit of clean-up around the "What should a CNCF WG do in this space?" section

By Doug Davis <dug@...> · #833 ·

Re: Agenda for TOC 4/19/17 Meeting

thanks Mark! can you be sure to remind me & chris to get this discussed in the next TOC in 2-3 weeks? feel free to add reminder to today's TOC deck

By alexis richardson · #832 ·

Re: Agenda for TOC 4/19/17 Meeting

Given dockercon might take away availability and attention I’d be fine with moving further serverless discussion out to the next meeting. Perhaps a reminder to review/comment on the notes

By Mark Peek · #831 ·

Re: Agenda for TOC 4/19/17 Meeting

thanks Chris ** urgent ** if anyone has any adds for today please shout out. eg: do we want to have a recap on next steps for Serverless discussion, or wait till after

By alexis richardson · #830 ·

Agenda for TOC 4/19/17 Meeting

Here's the draft agenda deck for tomorrow: https://goo.gl/1PJscF The main topics are: - Networking WG Update / Recommendations - Community presentation from Vitess

By Chris Aniszczyk · #829 ·

Kubernetes Panel and Reception in Austin, a CNCF Sponsored Event, 6 PM Mon 4/17

Hello, Please join the CNCF, CoreOS and Google Cloud Platform for a panel and reception where you can mingle and hear from some of the experts in the Kubernetes community. It will be held at 6 PM on

By Katie Schultz <kschultz@...> · #828 ·

CNCF K8s Conformance WG Meeting Monday, 4/17 3:30 PM at DockerCon Austin

CNCF is forming a working group to discuss Kubernetes Software Conformance and the potential for an associated branding program for conformant implementations. If your company provides software based

By Dan Kohn <dan@...> · #827 ·

Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless

Hello all, Sorry to join the discussion so late. I've added comments to the document, but I also wanted to present some thoughts more directly. I work at iRobot, and we transitioned our fleet of

By Kehoe, Ben <bkehoe@...> · #826 ·

Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless

I also added more content to the doc. I agree with Yaron and Doug on discussing and collaborating at an early stage to avoid the pain of having to build a converged standard later. Especially for

By Cathy Zhang <Cathy.H.Zhang@...> · #825 ·

Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless

Yario - exactly. Even if its too soon for standards, just having some of the key players in the same (virtual) room discussing high level topics (like terminology and usecases) might lead to the

By Doug Davis <dug@...> · #824 ·

Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless

Mark/Doug, I added my comments and more content to the doc No room for “standards” yet, but I think it’s better to discuss when things are in an early stage rather than after people made

By Yaron Haviv · #823 ·

Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless

For continuity on this thread, here are some quick notes from discussion in the TOC meeting today: - Seeing more developers embrace serverless - Most (if not all) people on the call

By Mark Peek · #822 ·

FYI: Vendor/Community-Maintained K8s Offerings + Conformance

On the call we mentioned the starting of the k8s conformance efforts + a list of k8s related offerings that we're maintaining. Here's the current list of ~60 offerings at the moment, feel free to add

By Chris Aniszczyk · #821 ·

TOC Agenda for 4/5/2017

Here's the deck for today: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1EbZEvW7zlXS7DhNnL2GkWN8H5P3uz5DvBSXMcE4sE7U/edit#slide=id.gd5ae4e962_2_136 -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

By Chris Aniszczyk · #820 ·

Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless

I took the liberty of starting a google doc just to have a place for people to add their thoughts on this

By Doug Davis <dug@...> · #819 ·

Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless

Hi Alexis, Thanks for being supportiveJ Looks like Brian also thinks this is in line with “Cloud Native”. I think the first step is to define the charter/scope/deliverables of the WG,

By Cathy Zhang <Cathy.H.Zhang@...> · #818 ·

Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless

Open to any approach forward. One pattern we are currently exploring has event, message bus, policy and end-point registry as a common utility service vs embedded within application

By NASSAUR, DOUGLAS C <dn283x@...> · #817 ·

Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless

I agree there is some intersection for the scaling aspect but I could see the serverless WG taking on other areas, for example common eventing and runtime. I’d like the TOC to approve a serverless

By Mark Peek · #816 ·

7161 - 7180 of 7995

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms