cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

+1 on a CNCF WG for serverless. Per a side conversation with Alexis this should be discussed at the TOC so it would be nice to have this added as an agenda item for an upcoming meeting. Mark

By Mark Peek · #795 ·

Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless

I agree with many of the points, had a bunch of 1:1 chats @ KubeCon on the need for more colaboration in that space There will be a bunch of implementations by cloud and OpenSource (I presented

By Yaron Haviv · #794 ·

Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless

I’m not a fan of the term “serverless” as most people tend to think “no servers” as opposed to “fewer” or “not having to deal with” servers. Of course, FaaS doesn’t quite roll off

By Mark Peek · #793 ·

Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless

Yes, I find this story inspiring from Benchling of moving their genome searching to Lambda and both reducing tail latency and dropping costs from thousands of dollars per month to

By Dan Kohn <dan@...> · #792 ·

Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless

I agree. As well as fast startup time and zero cost for idle workloads.

By Brian Grant · #791 ·

Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless

Related to this, many FaaS proponents talk about the economics of only paying for use (function calls). But this economic model is not limited to the serverless app frameworks eg as listed below by

By alexis richardson · #790 ·

Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless

I don't find the term "serverless" to be useful. It's too broad, and could encompass purely client-based computations and web hosting as well as FaaS. I see Functions as a Service as an instance of

By Brian Grant · #789 ·

Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless

Two weeks ago, we at Container Solutions, had an internal hackaton around serverless. Tried most of the tools listed by you Ryan. We are going to publish some blog posts about our findings later

By Pini Reznik · #788 ·

Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless

Hi, I have been lurking on this list for sometime now. Skippbox which I founded was recently acquired by Bitnami (a recent member of CNCF). At Kubecon thursday I introduced kubeless[1] which

By sebastien goasguen <sebgoa@...> · #787 ·

Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless

[inlined] <anthony@...> wrote: Agreement on these terms is probably a bit much to expect. For some time I was hoping we'd settle on "Jeff". While I'm not a lawyer, Lambda seems like the

By Ryan S. Brown <ryansb@...> · #786 ·

Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless

By alexis richardson · #785 ·

Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless

Thanks for kicking this off Ryan. To provide a little more context for the rest of the TOC, I worked on the first ServerlessConf with Peter Sbarski (in CC) and Alexis asked if it would be possible to

By Mark Coleman <mark@...> · #784 ·

Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless

We would like to see a separate group working on serverless as well. At Galactic Fog we have had a serverless implementation on DCOS for about 6 months, and we plan to release our Kubernetes native

By Anthony Skipper <anthony@...> · #783 ·

The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless

Hello all, If haven't heard Amazon&others raising a general ruckus about serverless lately, I sincerely hope your vacation to the backwoods was relaxing. 😁 I'm Ryan, and I've been interested in

By Ryan S. Brown <ryansb@...> · #782 ·

Re: [RESULT] rkt project accepted (incubation)

Congratulations to the rkt team :)

By alexis richardson · #781 ·

Re: [RESULT] containerd project accepted (incubation)

Great news, congratulations containerd!

By alexis richardson · #780 ·

[RESULT] rkt project accepted (incubation)

Hey everyone, I'm thrilled to announce that rkt (https://github.com/coreos/rkt) has been accepted as a CNCF incubation level project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/33 binding +1 TOC votes (8/9): -

By Chris Aniszczyk · #779 ·

[RESULT] containerd project accepted (incubation)

Hey everyone, I'm thrilled to announce that containerd (http://containerd.io/) has been accepted as a CNCF incubation level project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/32 binding +1 TOC votes (8/9): -

By Chris Aniszczyk · #778 ·

Re: [VOTE] rkt project proposal (incubation)

By Solomon Hykes <solomon.hykes@...> · #777 ·

Re: [VOTE] containerd project proposal (incubation)

+1 Very excited to see this come together.

By Solomon Hykes <solomon.hykes@...> · #776 ·

7201 - 7220 of 7995

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms