|
Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless
+1 on a CNCF WG for serverless. Per a side conversation with Alexis this should be discussed at the TOC so it would be nice to have this added as an agenda item for an upcoming meeting.
Mark
+1 on a CNCF WG for serverless. Per a side conversation with Alexis this should be discussed at the TOC so it would be nice to have this added as an agenda item for an upcoming meeting.
Mark
|
By
Mark Peek
·
#795
·
|
|
Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless
I agree with many of the points, had a bunch of 1:1 chats @ KubeCon on the need for more colaboration in that space
There will be a bunch of implementations by cloud and OpenSource (I presented
I agree with many of the points, had a bunch of 1:1 chats @ KubeCon on the need for more colaboration in that space
There will be a bunch of implementations by cloud and OpenSource (I presented
|
By
Yaron Haviv
·
#794
·
|
|
Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless
I’m not a fan of the term “serverless” as most people tend to think “no servers” as opposed to “fewer” or “not having to deal with” servers. Of course, FaaS doesn’t quite roll off
I’m not a fan of the term “serverless” as most people tend to think “no servers” as opposed to “fewer” or “not having to deal with” servers. Of course, FaaS doesn’t quite roll off
|
By
Mark Peek
·
#793
·
|
|
Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless
Yes, I find this story inspiring from Benchling of moving their genome searching to Lambda and both reducing tail latency and dropping costs from thousands of dollars per month to
Yes, I find this story inspiring from Benchling of moving their genome searching to Lambda and both reducing tail latency and dropping costs from thousands of dollars per month to
|
By
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
·
#792
·
|
|
Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless
I agree. As well as fast startup time and zero cost for idle workloads.
I agree. As well as fast startup time and zero cost for idle workloads.
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#791
·
|
|
Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless
Related to this, many FaaS proponents talk about the economics of only paying for use (function calls). But this economic model is not limited to the serverless app frameworks eg as listed below by
Related to this, many FaaS proponents talk about the economics of only paying for use (function calls). But this economic model is not limited to the serverless app frameworks eg as listed below by
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#790
·
|
|
Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless
I don't find the term "serverless" to be useful. It's too broad, and could encompass purely client-based computations and web hosting as well as FaaS.
I see Functions as a Service as an instance of
I don't find the term "serverless" to be useful. It's too broad, and could encompass purely client-based computations and web hosting as well as FaaS.
I see Functions as a Service as an instance of
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#789
·
|
|
Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless
Two weeks ago, we at Container Solutions, had an internal hackaton around serverless.
Tried most of the tools listed by you Ryan.
We are going to publish some blog posts about our findings later
Two weeks ago, we at Container Solutions, had an internal hackaton around serverless.
Tried most of the tools listed by you Ryan.
We are going to publish some blog posts about our findings later
|
By
Pini Reznik
·
#788
·
|
|
Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless
Hi,
I have been lurking on this list for sometime now. Skippbox which I founded was recently acquired by Bitnami (a recent member of CNCF). At Kubecon thursday I introduced kubeless[1] which
Hi,
I have been lurking on this list for sometime now. Skippbox which I founded was recently acquired by Bitnami (a recent member of CNCF). At Kubecon thursday I introduced kubeless[1] which
|
By
sebastien goasguen <sebgoa@...>
·
#787
·
|
|
Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless
[inlined]
<anthony@...> wrote:
Agreement on these terms is probably a bit much to expect. For some
time I was hoping we'd settle on "Jeff". While I'm not a lawyer,
Lambda seems like the
[inlined]
<anthony@...> wrote:
Agreement on these terms is probably a bit much to expect. For some
time I was hoping we'd settle on "Jeff". While I'm not a lawyer,
Lambda seems like the
|
By
Ryan S. Brown <ryansb@...>
·
#786
·
|
|
Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless
+1
By
alexis richardson
·
#785
·
|
|
Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless
Thanks for kicking this off Ryan.
To provide a little more context for the rest of the TOC, I worked on the first ServerlessConf with Peter Sbarski (in CC) and Alexis asked if it would be possible to
Thanks for kicking this off Ryan.
To provide a little more context for the rest of the TOC, I worked on the first ServerlessConf with Peter Sbarski (in CC) and Alexis asked if it would be possible to
|
By
Mark Coleman <mark@...>
·
#784
·
|
|
Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless
We would like to see a separate group working on serverless as well. At Galactic Fog we have had a serverless implementation on DCOS for about 6 months, and we plan to release our Kubernetes native
We would like to see a separate group working on serverless as well. At Galactic Fog we have had a serverless implementation on DCOS for about 6 months, and we plan to release our Kubernetes native
|
By
Anthony Skipper <anthony@...>
·
#783
·
|
|
The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless
Hello all,
If haven't heard Amazon&others raising a general ruckus about serverless lately, I sincerely hope your vacation to the backwoods was relaxing. 😁
I'm Ryan, and I've been interested in
Hello all,
If haven't heard Amazon&others raising a general ruckus about serverless lately, I sincerely hope your vacation to the backwoods was relaxing. 😁
I'm Ryan, and I've been interested in
|
By
Ryan S. Brown <ryansb@...>
·
#782
·
|
|
Re: [RESULT] rkt project accepted (incubation)
Congratulations to the rkt team :)
Congratulations to the rkt team :)
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#781
·
|
|
Re: [RESULT] containerd project accepted (incubation)
Great news, congratulations containerd!
Great news, congratulations containerd!
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#780
·
|
|
[RESULT] rkt project accepted (incubation)
Hey everyone, I'm thrilled to announce that rkt (https://github.com/coreos/rkt) has been accepted as a CNCF incubation level project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/33
binding +1 TOC votes (8/9):
-
Hey everyone, I'm thrilled to announce that rkt (https://github.com/coreos/rkt) has been accepted as a CNCF incubation level project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/33
binding +1 TOC votes (8/9):
-
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#779
·
|
|
[RESULT] containerd project accepted (incubation)
Hey everyone, I'm thrilled to announce that containerd (http://containerd.io/) has been accepted as a CNCF incubation level project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/32
binding +1 TOC votes (8/9):
-
Hey everyone, I'm thrilled to announce that containerd (http://containerd.io/) has been accepted as a CNCF incubation level project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/32
binding +1 TOC votes (8/9):
-
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#778
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] rkt project proposal (incubation)
+1
By
Solomon Hykes <solomon.hykes@...>
·
#777
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] containerd project proposal (incubation)
+1
Very excited to see this come together.
+1
Very excited to see this come together.
|
By
Solomon Hykes <solomon.hykes@...>
·
#776
·
|