|
Re: [VOTE] Cloud Custodian for incubation
+1B
By
Emily Fox
·
#7233
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] TAG Contributor Strategy Mentoring WG
+1B
By
Emily Fox
·
#7232
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Cloud Custodian for incubation
A HUGE +1 and non-binding vote.
Cloud Custodian is the lingua franca of cloud governance and is near-ubiquitous. Preliminary congratulations to Kapil, Umair, Jorge, and the entire development
A HUGE +1 and non-binding vote.
Cloud Custodian is the lingua franca of cloud governance and is near-ubiquitous. Preliminary congratulations to Kapil, Umair, Jorge, and the entire development
|
By
Liam Randall
·
#7231
·
|
|
[VOTE] TAG Contributor Strategy Mentoring WG
This is the official vote to approve the Mentoring Working Group for TAG Contributor Strategy.
PR: https://github.com/cncf/tag-contributor-strategy/pull/188
Charter:
This is the official vote to approve the Mentoring Working Group for TAG Contributor Strategy.
PR: https://github.com/cncf/tag-contributor-strategy/pull/188
Charter:
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#7230
·
|
|
[VOTE] Cloud Custodian for incubation
Cloud Custodian has applied to move to the incubation level.
PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/644
DD:
Cloud Custodian has applied to move to the incubation level.
PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/644
DD:
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#7229
·
|
|
CNCF Project Sync tomorrow - with Developer Reps!
Hi all,
We have our biweekly office hours tomorrow at 8am Pacific on Zoom, and we'll have our Developer Reps on the GB joining us.
https://zoom.us/j/96394073800?pwd=K2R5ZEVlZWNXN2VlcVFPbzlWUjZzUT09
Hi all,
We have our biweekly office hours tomorrow at 8am Pacific on Zoom, and we'll have our Developer Reps on the GB joining us.
https://zoom.us/j/96394073800?pwd=K2R5ZEVlZWNXN2VlcVFPbzlWUjZzUT09
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#7228
·
|
|
[RESULT]Kyverno has passed for incubation
Kyverno has passed the TOC vote for incubation.
https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/7007
7/10
Davanum Srinivas: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/7013
Ricardo Rocha:
Kyverno has passed the TOC vote for incubation.
https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/7007
7/10
Davanum Srinivas: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/7013
Ricardo Rocha:
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#7227
·
|
|
Vineyard 2022 Annual Review Submitted
Dear CNCF TOC members,
The Vineyard maintainers have submitted the 2022 Annual Review for Vineyard (a CNCF Sandbox project). Here is the link to the PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/874.
Any
Dear CNCF TOC members,
The Vineyard maintainers have submitted the 2022 Annual Review for Vineyard (a CNCF Sandbox project). Here is the link to the PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/874.
Any
|
By
Vineyard <vineyard@...>
·
#7226
·
|
|
WasmEdge Runtime-2022-Annual Review
Dear TOC members,
Please see the PR below for WasmEdge's (sanbox project) first annual review report!
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/873
Look forward to your thoughts and
Dear TOC members,
Please see the PR below for WasmEdge's (sanbox project) first annual review report!
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/873
Look forward to your thoughts and
|
By
Michael Yuan
·
#7225
·
|
|
Telepresence 2022 Annual Review
Hello!
I have just raised a PR containing the annual sandbox review for the Telepresence project; you can find it over here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/872
Please let me know if there's anything
Hello!
I have just raised a PR containing the annual sandbox review for the Telepresence project; you can find it over here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/872
Please let me know if there's anything
|
By
Jose Cortes <josecortes@...>
·
#7224
·
|
|
Antrea-2022-Annual Review
Hi everyone,
The Antrea maintainers have submitted the 2022 Annual Review for Antrea (a CNCF Sandbox project). Here is the link to the PR:https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/871. We welcome any
Hi everyone,
The Antrea maintainers have submitted the 2022 Annual Review for Antrea (a CNCF Sandbox project). Here is the link to the PR:https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/871. We welcome any
|
By
Antonin Bas <abas@...>
·
#7223
·
|
|
Re: Interim CNCF CoCC and New structure of WG for CoCC update
What's the deadline for TAG-appointed approvers? I don't think I've seen one yet.
--
-- Josh Berkus
Kubernetes Community Architect
OSPO, OCTO
What's the deadline for TAG-appointed approvers? I don't think I've seen one yet.
--
-- Josh Berkus
Kubernetes Community Architect
OSPO, OCTO
|
By
Josh Berkus
·
#7222
·
|
|
Re: Interim CNCF CoCC and New structure of WG for CoCC update
Folks,
Monday July 11th is the deadline for elected community member Approver! Please send in your nomination if you are interested in helping lead the work group efforts.
thanks,
-- Dims--
Davanum
Folks,
Monday July 11th is the deadline for elected community member Approver! Please send in your nomination if you are interested in helping lead the work group efforts.
thanks,
-- Dims--
Davanum
|
By
Davanum Srinivas
·
#7221
·
|
|
Re: Real Name Policy for CNCF
Folks,
Please use this issue and add as much context/questions as you can so the GB and GB's Legal Committee can consider them during their decision making
Folks,
Please use this issue and add as much context/questions as you can so the GB and GB's Legal Committee can consider them during their decision making
|
By
Davanum Srinivas
·
#7220
·
|
|
Re: Real Name Policy for CNCF
Thanks, Chris. I appreciate the clarification.
--Aeva
Thanks, Chris. I appreciate the clarification.
--Aeva
|
By
Aeva
·
#7219
·
|
|
Re: Real Name Policy for CNCF
+1
Although it might be difficult to quantify the size and scope of impact, it is nonetheless important that we find a solution.
As there is a body of prior art and consensus on the topic, I’m
+1
Although it might be difficult to quantify the size and scope of impact, it is nonetheless important that we find a solution.
As there is a body of prior art and consensus on the topic, I’m
|
By
Matt Young
·
#7218
·
|
|
Re: Real Name Policy for CNCF
We point to the Linux Kernel as an example in the FAQ as the original and canonical DCO reference:
We point to the Linux Kernel as an example in the FAQ as the original and canonical DCO reference:
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#7217
·
|
|
Re: Real Name Policy for CNCF
Hey folks, just to let you know, this is a policy that has been in place for awhile in multiple LF communities like the Linux Kernel, Hyperledger etc.
I'm not reverting the change as this is what the
Hey folks, just to let you know, this is a policy that has been in place for awhile in multiple LF communities like the Linux Kernel, Hyperledger etc.
I'm not reverting the change as this is what the
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#7216
·
|
|
Re: Real Name Policy for CNCF
+1 to the concerns here, and +1 to having the appropriate folks discuss this issue, in ways that consider both the legal requirements regarding copyright assignment, and precedent in other
+1 to the concerns here, and +1 to having the appropriate folks discuss this issue, in ways that consider both the legal requirements regarding copyright assignment, and precedent in other
|
By
Aeva
·
#7215
·
|
|
Re: Real Name Policy for CNCF
Can we get a clarification on "Real Names", please? That could resolve this. I'm sure other LF projects aren't turning away trans contributors ... is there language they use?
--
-- Josh Berkus
Can we get a clarification on "Real Names", please? That could resolve this. I'm sure other LF projects aren't turning away trans contributors ... is there language they use?
--
-- Josh Berkus
|
By
Josh Berkus
·
#7214
·
|