|
CNCF Project Sync tomorrow - with Developer Reps!
Hi all,
We have our biweekly office hours tomorrow at 8am Pacific on Zoom, and we'll have our Developer Reps on the GB joining us.
https://zoom.us/j/96394073800?pwd=K2R5ZEVlZWNXN2VlcVFPbzlWUjZzUT09
Hi all,
We have our biweekly office hours tomorrow at 8am Pacific on Zoom, and we'll have our Developer Reps on the GB joining us.
https://zoom.us/j/96394073800?pwd=K2R5ZEVlZWNXN2VlcVFPbzlWUjZzUT09
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#7228
·
|
|
[RESULT]Kyverno has passed for incubation
Kyverno has passed the TOC vote for incubation.
https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/7007
7/10
Davanum Srinivas: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/7013
Ricardo Rocha:
Kyverno has passed the TOC vote for incubation.
https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/7007
7/10
Davanum Srinivas: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/7013
Ricardo Rocha:
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#7227
·
|
|
Vineyard 2022 Annual Review Submitted
Dear CNCF TOC members,
The Vineyard maintainers have submitted the 2022 Annual Review for Vineyard (a CNCF Sandbox project). Here is the link to the PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/874.
Any
Dear CNCF TOC members,
The Vineyard maintainers have submitted the 2022 Annual Review for Vineyard (a CNCF Sandbox project). Here is the link to the PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/874.
Any
|
By
Vineyard <vineyard@...>
·
#7226
·
|
|
WasmEdge Runtime-2022-Annual Review
Dear TOC members,
Please see the PR below for WasmEdge's (sanbox project) first annual review report!
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/873
Look forward to your thoughts and
Dear TOC members,
Please see the PR below for WasmEdge's (sanbox project) first annual review report!
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/873
Look forward to your thoughts and
|
By
Michael Yuan
·
#7225
·
|
|
Telepresence 2022 Annual Review
Hello!
I have just raised a PR containing the annual sandbox review for the Telepresence project; you can find it over here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/872
Please let me know if there's anything
Hello!
I have just raised a PR containing the annual sandbox review for the Telepresence project; you can find it over here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/872
Please let me know if there's anything
|
By
Jose Cortes <josecortes@...>
·
#7224
·
|
|
Antrea-2022-Annual Review
Hi everyone,
The Antrea maintainers have submitted the 2022 Annual Review for Antrea (a CNCF Sandbox project). Here is the link to the PR:https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/871. We welcome any
Hi everyone,
The Antrea maintainers have submitted the 2022 Annual Review for Antrea (a CNCF Sandbox project). Here is the link to the PR:https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/871. We welcome any
|
By
Antonin Bas <abas@...>
·
#7223
·
|
|
Re: Interim CNCF CoCC and New structure of WG for CoCC update
What's the deadline for TAG-appointed approvers? I don't think I've seen one yet.
--
-- Josh Berkus
Kubernetes Community Architect
OSPO, OCTO
What's the deadline for TAG-appointed approvers? I don't think I've seen one yet.
--
-- Josh Berkus
Kubernetes Community Architect
OSPO, OCTO
|
By
Josh Berkus
·
#7222
·
|
|
Re: Interim CNCF CoCC and New structure of WG for CoCC update
Folks,
Monday July 11th is the deadline for elected community member Approver! Please send in your nomination if you are interested in helping lead the work group efforts.
thanks,
-- Dims--
Davanum
Folks,
Monday July 11th is the deadline for elected community member Approver! Please send in your nomination if you are interested in helping lead the work group efforts.
thanks,
-- Dims--
Davanum
|
By
Davanum Srinivas
·
#7221
·
|
|
Re: Real Name Policy for CNCF
Folks,
Please use this issue and add as much context/questions as you can so the GB and GB's Legal Committee can consider them during their decision making
Folks,
Please use this issue and add as much context/questions as you can so the GB and GB's Legal Committee can consider them during their decision making
|
By
Davanum Srinivas
·
#7220
·
|
|
Re: Real Name Policy for CNCF
Thanks, Chris. I appreciate the clarification.
--Aeva
Thanks, Chris. I appreciate the clarification.
--Aeva
|
By
Aeva
·
#7219
·
|
|
Re: Real Name Policy for CNCF
+1
Although it might be difficult to quantify the size and scope of impact, it is nonetheless important that we find a solution.
As there is a body of prior art and consensus on the topic, I’m
+1
Although it might be difficult to quantify the size and scope of impact, it is nonetheless important that we find a solution.
As there is a body of prior art and consensus on the topic, I’m
|
By
Matt Young
·
#7218
·
|
|
Re: Real Name Policy for CNCF
We point to the Linux Kernel as an example in the FAQ as the original and canonical DCO reference:
We point to the Linux Kernel as an example in the FAQ as the original and canonical DCO reference:
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#7217
·
|
|
Re: Real Name Policy for CNCF
Hey folks, just to let you know, this is a policy that has been in place for awhile in multiple LF communities like the Linux Kernel, Hyperledger etc.
I'm not reverting the change as this is what the
Hey folks, just to let you know, this is a policy that has been in place for awhile in multiple LF communities like the Linux Kernel, Hyperledger etc.
I'm not reverting the change as this is what the
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#7216
·
|
|
Re: Real Name Policy for CNCF
+1 to the concerns here, and +1 to having the appropriate folks discuss this issue, in ways that consider both the legal requirements regarding copyright assignment, and precedent in other
+1 to the concerns here, and +1 to having the appropriate folks discuss this issue, in ways that consider both the legal requirements regarding copyright assignment, and precedent in other
|
By
Aeva
·
#7215
·
|
|
Re: Real Name Policy for CNCF
Can we get a clarification on "Real Names", please? That could resolve this. I'm sure other LF projects aren't turning away trans contributors ... is there language they use?
--
-- Josh Berkus
Can we get a clarification on "Real Names", please? That could resolve this. I'm sure other LF projects aren't turning away trans contributors ... is there language they use?
--
-- Josh Berkus
|
By
Josh Berkus
·
#7214
·
|
|
Re: Real Name Policy for CNCF
ChrisA,
Hope you don't mind me talking candidly :) should have cross checked the recipients :)
-- Dims--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
ChrisA,
Hope you don't mind me talking candidly :) should have cross checked the recipients :)
-- Dims--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
|
By
Davanum Srinivas
·
#7213
·
|
|
Re: Real Name Policy for CNCF
Josh,
I would tell folks to NOT change anything that they are doing today.
ChrisA jumped the gun and pushed the change directly to master. I was looking to have a conversation + debate.
I am waiting
Josh,
I would tell folks to NOT change anything that they are doing today.
ChrisA jumped the gun and pushed the change directly to master. I was looking to have a conversation + debate.
I am waiting
|
By
Davanum Srinivas
·
#7212
·
|
|
Re: Real Name Policy for CNCF
Dims,
Can you explain how we reconcile this with the CNCF code of conduct?
Asking because a simple reading of it would require "deadnaming" many of our trans contributors. How do we avoid
Dims,
Can you explain how we reconcile this with the CNCF code of conduct?
Asking because a simple reading of it would require "deadnaming" many of our trans contributors. How do we avoid
|
By
Josh Berkus
·
#7211
·
|
|
Fluid 2022 Annual Review submitted
Dear CNCF TOC members,
I am Rong Gu, a maintainer of Fluid project (CNCF sandbox). We have submitted the Fluid 2022 Annual Review. The PR is here:https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/870. Please kindly
Dear CNCF TOC members,
I am Rong Gu, a maintainer of Fluid project (CNCF sandbox). We have submitted the Fluid 2022 Annual Review. The PR is here:https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/870. Please kindly
|
By
顾荣 <gurongwalker@...>
·
#7210
·
|
|
Re: Mentoring WG for Approval
Reviewed too! LGTM
By
Katie Gamanji
·
#7209
·
|