|
Re: Results from Sandbox Inclusion Meeting, 6/14
In addition.
--
-- Josh Berkus
Kubernetes Community Architect
OSPO, OCTO
In addition.
--
-- Josh Berkus
Kubernetes Community Architect
OSPO, OCTO
|
By
Josh Berkus
·
#7150
·
|
|
Re: Results from Sandbox Inclusion Meeting, 6/14
Josh,
instead of the recording or in addition to the zoom recording?--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
Josh,
instead of the recording or in addition to the zoom recording?--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
|
By
Davanum Srinivas
·
#7149
·
|
|
Re: Results from Sandbox Inclusion Meeting, 6/14
Can I suggest again that this kind of feedback get created as an issue in the TOC repo, so that everyone can track it better?
--
-- Josh Berkus
Kubernetes Community Architect
OSPO, OCTO
Can I suggest again that this kind of feedback get created as an issue in the TOC repo, so that everyone can track it better?
--
-- Josh Berkus
Kubernetes Community Architect
OSPO, OCTO
|
By
Josh Berkus
·
#7148
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Kyverno for incubation
+1 binding
By
Matt Farina
·
#7147
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Kyverno for incubation
+1 binding
By
Lei Zhang
·
#7146
·
|
|
Re: Results from Sandbox Inclusion Meeting, 6/14
Great, thanks!
By
Huabing Zhao
·
#7145
·
|
|
Re: Policy question: What happens when projects merge?
Thanks everyone for the reminders about OpenTracing and OpenTelemetry, I had completely forgotten about that merge! I'd definitely be interested in hearing more from anyone involved in that either
Thanks everyone for the reminders about OpenTracing and OpenTelemetry, I had completely forgotten about that merge! I'd definitely be interested in hearing more from anyone involved in that either
|
By
Nick Young
·
#7144
·
|
|
Re: Results from Sandbox Inclusion Meeting, 6/14
Huabing Zhao,
Please review the recording https://youtu.be/zcTZ2pYPM9I you will hear us talk about the section in the main README that says to contact you directly via email. it may be good to point
Huabing Zhao,
Please review the recording https://youtu.be/zcTZ2pYPM9I you will hear us talk about the section in the main README that says to contact you directly via email. it may be good to point
|
By
Davanum Srinivas
·
#7143
·
|
|
Re: Results from Sandbox Inclusion Meeting, 6/14
Hi Davanum, Amye,
I noticed that there's a to-do for Aeraki Mesh. Should I reach out to someone to proceed?
Aeraki Mesh - passes with a majority vote of the TOC, establish open contribution
Hi Davanum, Amye,
I noticed that there's a to-do for Aeraki Mesh. Should I reach out to someone to proceed?
Aeraki Mesh - passes with a majority vote of the TOC, establish open contribution
|
By
Huabing Zhao
·
#7142
·
|
|
Re: Policy question: What happens when projects merge?
The OpenTracing and OpenCensus communities seem to have blazed the way here with OpenTelemetry -- I don't know if they have any learnings that they'd want to share about what worked well, or what
The OpenTracing and OpenCensus communities seem to have blazed the way here with OpenTelemetry -- I don't know if they have any learnings that they'd want to share about what worked well, or what
|
By
Evan Anderson
·
#7141
·
|
|
Re: Results from Sandbox Inclusion Meeting, 6/14
Folks,
Please ping us on #toc channel or drop an email to the toc or private-toc mailing list if you have any questions after reviewing the video of the zoom call today. Please don't mind the short
Folks,
Please ping us on #toc channel or drop an email to the toc or private-toc mailing list if you have any questions after reviewing the video of the zoom call today. Please don't mind the short
|
By
Davanum Srinivas
·
#7140
·
|
|
Results from Sandbox Inclusion Meeting, 6/14
The TOC met today to review the sandbox applications available at sandbox.cncf.io
Clusterpedia - passes with a majority vote of the TOC
Turnbuckle - reapply in 6 months with a more robust
The TOC met today to review the sandbox applications available at sandbox.cncf.io
Clusterpedia - passes with a majority vote of the TOC
Turnbuckle - reapply in 6 months with a more robust
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#7139
·
|
|
Re: Policy question: What happens when projects merge?
Nick,
Thanks for reaching out. One of the main objectives of the process is to give assurance to the end users of CNCF projects that we as a community stand behind the projects they are using (esp
Nick,
Thanks for reaching out. One of the main objectives of the process is to give assurance to the end users of CNCF projects that we as a community stand behind the projects they are using (esp
|
By
Davanum Srinivas
·
#7138
·
|
|
Re: Policy question: What happens when projects merge?
Something similar did happen in the past: As part of OpenTelemetry's
move from sandbox to incubation, the OpenTracing project agreed to
archive itself.
*Without having looked at the details, going
Something similar did happen in the past: As part of OpenTelemetry's
move from sandbox to incubation, the OpenTracing project agreed to
archive itself.
*Without having looked at the details, going
|
By
Richard Hartmann
·
#7137
·
|
|
Policy question: What happens when projects merge?
Hi TOC, and everyone else,
With the successful launch of Envoy Gateway, there's a question about what to do about Contour's lifecycle as an incubated project in the CNCF.
I firmly believe that Envoy
Hi TOC, and everyone else,
With the successful launch of Envoy Gateway, there's a question about what to do about Contour's lifecycle as an incubated project in the CNCF.
I firmly believe that Envoy
|
By
Nick Young
·
#7136
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group
Great, thanks Dims - looking forward to hearing what the alternate proposal will be.
Joanna sounds like a fantastic external advisor. How are others selected? What is the approval process?
Thanks
Great, thanks Dims - looking forward to hearing what the alternate proposal will be.
Joanna sounds like a fantastic external advisor. How are others selected? What is the approval process?
Thanks
|
By
Karena Angell
·
#7135
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group
Q: Will this Working Group be held in an open forum similar to other CNCF Working Groups or is this suggesting a closed group?
A: We are revisiting the composition of this WG, please stay tuned for an
Q: Will this Working Group be held in an open forum similar to other CNCF Working Groups or is this suggesting a closed group?
A: We are revisiting the composition of this WG, please stay tuned for an
|
By
Davanum Srinivas
·
#7134
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group
Celeste,
Hang in there :) Don't want to lose your participation!! https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/7127
thanks,
Dims--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
Celeste,
Hang in there :) Don't want to lose your participation!! https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/7127
thanks,
Dims--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
|
By
Davanum Srinivas
·
#7133
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group
Thanks for the feedback Aeva, please see https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/7127 from Arun.
-- Dims--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
Thanks for the feedback Aeva, please see https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/7127 from Arun.
-- Dims--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
|
By
Davanum Srinivas
·
#7132
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group
Josh,
back to the drawing board! https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/7127
thanks,
Dims--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
Josh,
back to the drawing board! https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/7127
thanks,
Dims--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
|
By
Davanum Srinivas
·
#7131
·
|