cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Results from Sandbox Inclusion Meeting, 6/14

The TOC met today to review the sandbox applications available at sandbox.cncf.io Clusterpedia - passes with a majority vote of the TOC Turnbuckle - reapply in 6 months with a more robust

By Amye Scavarda Perrin · #7139 ·

Re: Policy question: What happens when projects merge?

Nick, Thanks for reaching out. One of the main objectives of the process is to give assurance to the end users of CNCF projects that we as a community stand behind the projects they are using (esp

By Davanum Srinivas · #7138 ·

Re: Policy question: What happens when projects merge?

Something similar did happen in the past: As part of OpenTelemetry's move from sandbox to incubation, the OpenTracing project agreed to archive itself. *Without having looked at the details, going

By Richard Hartmann · #7137 ·

Policy question: What happens when projects merge?

Hi TOC, and everyone else, With the successful launch of Envoy Gateway, there's a question about what to do about Contour's lifecycle as an incubated project in the CNCF. I firmly believe that Envoy

By Nick Young · #7136 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

Great, thanks Dims - looking forward to hearing what the alternate proposal will be. Joanna sounds like a fantastic external advisor. How are others selected? What is the approval process? Thanks

By Karena Angell · #7135 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

Q: Will this Working Group be held in an open forum similar to other CNCF Working Groups or is this suggesting a closed group? A: We are revisiting the composition of this WG, please stay tuned for an

By Davanum Srinivas · #7134 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

Celeste, Hang in there :) Don't want to lose your participation!! https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/7127 thanks, Dims-- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

By Davanum Srinivas · #7133 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

Thanks for the feedback Aeva, please see https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/7127 from Arun. -- Dims-- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

By Davanum Srinivas · #7132 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

Josh, back to the drawing board! https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/7127 thanks, Dims-- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

By Davanum Srinivas · #7131 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

Frederick, Yep, will see how to get something close to how other WGs work today. Also see https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/7127 thanks, Dims-- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

By Davanum Srinivas · #7130 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

Thanks for the feedback Libby, please see update here ( https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/7127 ) we will try to do better.-- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

By Davanum Srinivas · #7129 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

Dawn, Yep. got that! understood. -- dims-- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

By Davanum Srinivas · #7128 ·

[cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

Folks, FYI. Thanks for all the feedback so far on the WG structure! Please see the update from Arun. -- Dims ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gupta, Arun <arun.gupta@...> Date: Mon, Jun

By Davanum Srinivas · #7127 ·

Trickster Annual Sandbox Review

Greetings! The Trickster team is pleased to share our Annual Review PR with the TOC at https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/852 Thank you, James

By James Ranson <james@...> · #7126 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

Hi all, I’m concerned that limiting this to TAG Leadership puts even more work on already overloaded individuals. I know that as a TAG Leader, I personally don’t have the bandwidth to attend

By Dawn Foster · #7125 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

Agree with Aeva and others’ comments. The community should participate in defining the CoC, and be part of selecting the people responsible for representing them in maintaining the CoC. And, I

By Libby Meren · #7124 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

Perhaps we can separate out participation from acceptance? I don’t feel comfortable with a community code of conduct not including the community, but also think many of us will acknowledge that some

By Frederick Kautz · #7123 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

+1 to the concerns which Stephen and Josh have articulated. There were several other folks attending the BoF in Valencia who have subject expertise and volunteered to help -- but who have been

By Aeva · #7122 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

As this committee is currently structured, I do not feel that my participation in it would be productive. Regards Celeste Horgan

By celeste.e.horgan@... · #7121 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

Who is the "we" making these decisions? Did the General Board vote on this approach? -- -- Josh Berkus Kubernetes Community Architect OSPO, OCTO

By Josh Berkus · #7120 ·

881 - 900 of 8007

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms