For posterity, the YT playlist for those is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLj6h78yzYM2Mf6GCZzW6CAk6GlZESbemB Cheers! /max

Sandbox Review meetings are closed meetings but they are recorded, the recording will be available on YouTube the same day as the meeting.-- Amye Scavarda Perrin | Director of Developer Programs,

To close the loop: We talked about this during the GB town hall itself. None of them were on the CNCF community calendar; that was an oversight, apologies. Going forward they will

Hello everyone! Kuberhealthy has filed the 2022 annual review pull request for your consideration: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/848 Thanks CNCF! Eric

Hi Amye, Is the sandbox reviewing meeting open to the community? I have a proposed project that is supposed to be reviewed on June 14. I just think it might be helpful to attend the meeting. So if

Karena, Currently we have one `External Advisor' which is Joanna Lee [1] (who led the BOF [2]) during kubecon and has been helping with setting up the CoCC WG. I'll leave it to CNCF staff to speak to

Also, as follow-up questions since the eligibility requirements seem quite restrictive: Will this Working Group be held in an open forum similar to other CNCF Working Groups or is this suggesting a

+1 to Stephen and Josh Dims - could you please clarify what 'External Advisors' means and how they are selected?

+1. If we’re saying that one of the goals is to ensure a minimum participation bound from each of these representative groups, I would maybe suggest: Allow the representative group to determine

+1

That was what I assumed when each group was asked to appoint someone. In TAG-CS, we were already discussing who we would nominate. However, TAG chairs and core maintainers are the most overcommitted

Hi Josh, good question! we had competing interests (size of WG to ensure it's not too big to do its work vs broad criteria to accommodate folks from various bodies) most of the bodies, you can see

I'm confused by the updated criteria. For example, within TAG Contributor Strategy, we have several people who have direct expertise in CoCC formation. They are not our chairs. Shouldn't the COC-WG

Folks, Here are some updates to the eligibility of the CoCC WG. thanks, Dims ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gupta, Arun <arun.gupta@...> Date: Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 5:32 PM Subject: Re:

... was this supposed to be a community-wide event? It's not on the CNCF community calendar. -- -- Josh Berkus Kubernetes Community Architect OSPO, OCTO

This seems like a great meeting for me as a developer contributor, so happy to receive this message! Where was it advertised so I can subscribe for next time? Thank you!

Dear all, If you're trying to join the CNCF Governing Board Town Hall, Developer Seats which will start in two minutes: The old Zoom was invalid, the new one is https://zoom.us/j/5382335327 Sorry

Josh, +100 in principle! TOC folks will read/review the charter and comment in the doc or here. thanks, Dims-- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

TOC: TAG Contributor Strategy would like to create the Mentoring Working Group, under our TAG. You can find, and comment on, a draft charter here:

+1 NB