+1 NB -- ============================ Srinath Perera, Ph.D. Chief Architect, WSO2 Inc. http://people.apache.org/~hemapani/ https://medium.com/@srinathperera

Hello *, we have finally managed to complete the annual review for k8gb. The pull request is waiting for the review here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/837 It's our very first annual review so

Public comment is extended through May 25th due to KubeCon, the vote will open then. -- Amye Scavarda Perrin | Director of Developer Programs, CNCF | amye@...

The vote establishing a working group for Environmental Conservation/Sustainability has been approved by a majority of the TOC - https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/6862 8/10 Davanum Srinivas:

+1B. Excellent individuals with impactful contributions!

Cornelia Davis has stepped down from the TOC, we thank her very much for her work! We'll be running a special election for that seat, seating July 1st. Nominations are open to the Governing Board at

+1 NB. I've had the pleasure to work hand in hand with Marina, Michael, and Ragashree on several projects across the different areas of focus for the Security TAG. The three of them are exceptionally

Public comment is extended through May 25th due to KubeCon, the vote will open then.-- Amye Scavarda Perrin | Director of Developer Programs, CNCF | amye@...

+1 From:cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of alexis richardson via lists.cncf.io <alexis=weave.works@...> Date: Thursday, 5. May 2022 at 18:30 To: Liz Rice <liz@...> Cc: Alexis Richardson via

Hi TOC, The TAG Security Co-chairs would like to nominate Ragashree, Michael Lieberman, and Marina Moore as Technical Leads of TAG Security! They have been awesome members of the community

There is a different sandbox logo, and projects are required to explicitly say they are sandbox whenever they mention that they are CNCF projects. The staff are pretty good at chasing up if folks

We need VCs to sit on their hands until Incubation

Just for a historic perspective. When we did this discussion the last time, we identified that there are fundamentally two divergent goals that we have to balance: Projects Goal #1) Bring multiple,

Hello there! I’d like to report that a PR for the SMI sandbox project’s annual review has been submitted: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/833. Please review at your earliest convenience.

Remember, the point of cncf is not to create ways for committees to sit in judgment over projects. It is to make great projects that enable end user success. That is all.

Four levels would increase the total work required to assess a project through their life cycle. There might be good reasons to do it, but I don't see that it would solve the initial problem raised on

Stringent implies work, judgement, and value. It seems that scaling wall has been hit already..

I agree on quite a few points :) Replying in line with some thoughts > We tried SIGs (now TAGs) doing due diligence for projects. The level> of scrutiny, and the closeness to the guidance material

Which parts, specifically? I think we need consensus on a direction before we, potentially, start new/updating processes. Agreed. At the same time, we need to take Goodhart's law[1] into account. A

Richard how would you formalise this? The goal, IMO, is to reduce the subjective judgment on entry to sandbox, and increase the quantitative aspects