|
Re: Results from Sandbox Inclusion Meeting, April 26
Hello Dawn - thanks a lot for your direction here. We will surely work on the given resources. --
Hello Dawn - thanks a lot for your direction here. We will surely work on the given resources. --
|
By
Maulik Shyani
·
#6951
·
|
|
Re: Results from Sandbox Inclusion Meeting, April 26
Hi Maulik,
I’m not on the TOC, so I’m not sure if there were specific concerns about Matos raised during the meeting, but I do have a few suggestions for you based on our work within TAG
Hi Maulik,
I’m not on the TOC, so I’m not sure if there were specific concerns about Matos raised during the meeting, but I do have a few suggestions for you based on our work within TAG
|
By
Dawn Foster
·
#6950
·
|
|
Re: No TOC meetings for May 3 and May 17th, TOC panel on May 18
Thank you Amye for the update!
Do we know who will represent the TOC in the panel?
Thank you Amye for the update!
Do we know who will represent the TOC in the panel?
|
By
Katie Gamanji
·
#6949
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] WG Environmental Conservation/Sustainability
+1 binding
By
Matt Farina
·
#6948
·
|
|
No TOC meetings for May 3 and May 17th, TOC panel on May 18
A quick note that the TOC meetings for May 3rd and May 17th are cancelled. We have a conflict with the TOC for the 3rd, and we'll have an open TOC panel at KubeCon replacing our standard meeting for
A quick note that the TOC meetings for May 3rd and May 17th are cancelled. We have a conflict with the TOC for the 3rd, and we'll have an open TOC panel at KubeCon replacing our standard meeting for
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#6947
·
|
|
Re: Results from Sandbox Inclusion Meeting, April 26
Hello Amye and TOC,
Thanks for the details below on our Sandbox project entry of Matos.
Decision: Matos: Reapply in January '23 showing more robust community.
We submitted our entry in December'21
Hello Amye and TOC,
Thanks for the details below on our Sandbox project entry of Matos.
Decision: Matos: Reapply in January '23 showing more robust community.
We submitted our entry in December'21
|
By
Maulik Shyani
·
#6946
·
|
|
Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation
What resources do sandbox projects consume? How is that resource consumption justified?
IMO the main effort of a sandbox project should be getting into a position to apply for incubation, or keep
What resources do sandbox projects consume? How is that resource consumption justified?
IMO the main effort of a sandbox project should be getting into a position to apply for incubation, or keep
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#6945
·
|
|
Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation
I should add, that’s not intended as a criticism - the number of very early stage applications from individuals and single vendors has increased, which over time opened up the question for the TOC
I should add, that’s not intended as a criticism - the number of very early stage applications from individuals and single vendors has increased, which over time opened up the question for the TOC
|
By
Liz Rice
·
#6944
·
|
|
Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation
A little history: the current process was supposed to be super-lightweight, to reflect the very, very low bar for Sandbox projects - essentially, is it cloud native. I don’t remember the exact
A little history: the current process was supposed to be super-lightweight, to reflect the very, very low bar for Sandbox projects - essentially, is it cloud native. I don’t remember the exact
|
By
Liz Rice <liz@...>
·
#6943
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] WG Environmental Conservation/Sustainability
+1 nb
By
Olivier Sagory
·
#6942
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] WG Environmental Conservation/Sustainability
+1 non-binding
Rey Lejano
+1 non-binding
Rey Lejano
|
By
Rey Lejano
·
#6941
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] WG Environmental Conservation/Sustainability
+1 nb!
---
Stephen Augustus (he/him)
Head of Open Source
augustus@...
Mobile:(212) 390-0094
My working hours may not be your working hours.
Please do not feel obligated to reply
+1 nb!
---
Stephen Augustus (he/him)
Head of Open Source
augustus@...
Mobile:(212) 390-0094
My working hours may not be your working hours.
Please do not feel obligated to reply
|
By
Stephen Augustus (augustus)
·
#6940
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] WG Environmental Conservation/Sustainability
+1 non binding
By
claprun@...
·
#6939
·
|
|
Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation
+1
By
alexis richardson
·
#6938
·
|
|
Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation
I, for one, would love to see the sandbox process be faster and improve.
With regard to moving more work to the TAGs, two things come to mind.
First, when TAGs did more in the past they were
I, for one, would love to see the sandbox process be faster and improve.
With regard to moving more work to the TAGs, two things come to mind.
First, when TAGs did more in the past they were
|
By
Matt Farina
·
#6937
·
|
|
Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation
We have been thinking about this in TAG Observability as well, and have work in flight that’s related:
* Form Program: Annual Sandbox Review [1]
* Create summary slides [2]
[1]
We have been thinking about this in TAG Observability as well, and have work in flight that’s related:
* Form Program: Annual Sandbox Review [1]
* Create summary slides [2]
[1]
|
By
Matt Young
·
#6936
·
|
|
Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation
+1 to pushing more to TAGs. Perhaps each proposed project can be assigned to a TAG and a member of the TAG can lead a technical review and guide the project's leads on criteria for acceptance. That
+1 to pushing more to TAGs. Perhaps each proposed project can be assigned to a TAG and a member of the TAG can lead a technical review and guide the project's leads on criteria for acceptance. That
|
By
Josh Gavant
·
#6935
·
Edited
|
|
Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation
I like that Josh! A bit more work on the TOC side, but the paper trail is for sure a good idea.
Amye, TOC members,
Please chime in as well.
-- Dims
PS: we'll keep talking, when ready we can PR the
I like that Josh! A bit more work on the TOC side, but the paper trail is for sure a good idea.
Amye, TOC members,
Please chime in as well.
-- Dims
PS: we'll keep talking, when ready we can PR the
|
By
Davanum Srinivas
·
#6934
·
|
|
Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation
FWIW, this part of the process could be made considerably more efficient for both the projects and the TOC as well.
Right now, when sandbox projects are sent out and come back with answers, there's
FWIW, this part of the process could be made considerably more efficient for both the projects and the TOC as well.
Right now, when sandbox projects are sent out and come back with answers, there's
|
By
Josh Berkus
·
#6933
·
|
|
Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation
Chris,
I would prefer first to beef up our existing bodies and not spread thin folks already doing too much. My personal preference.
However I am not taking it off the table.
It would be great if
Chris,
I would prefer first to beef up our existing bodies and not spread thin folks already doing too much. My personal preference.
However I am not taking it off the table.
It would be great if
|
By
Davanum Srinivas
·
#6932
·
|