I should add, that’s not intended as a criticism - the number of very early stage applications from individuals and single vendors has increased, which over time opened up the question for the TOC

A little history: the current process was supposed to be super-lightweight, to reflect the very, very low bar for Sandbox projects - essentially, is it cloud native. I don’t remember the exact

+1 nb

+1 non-binding Rey Lejano

+1 nb! --- Stephen Augustus (he/him) Head of Open Source augustus@... Mobile:(212) 390-0094 My working hours may not be your working hours. Please do not feel obligated to reply

+1 non binding

+1

I, for one, would love to see the sandbox process be faster and improve. With regard to moving more work to the TAGs, two things come to mind. First, when TAGs did more in the past they were

We have been thinking about this in TAG Observability as well, and have work in flight that’s related: * Form Program: Annual Sandbox Review [1] * Create summary slides [2] [1]

+1 to pushing more to TAGs. Perhaps each proposed project can be assigned to a TAG and a member of the TAG can lead a technical review and guide the project's leads on criteria for acceptance. That

I like that Josh! A bit more work on the TOC side, but the paper trail is for sure a good idea. Amye, TOC members, Please chime in as well. -- Dims PS: we'll keep talking, when ready we can PR the

FWIW, this part of the process could be made considerably more efficient for both the projects and the TOC as well. Right now, when sandbox projects are sent out and come back with answers, there's

Chris, I would prefer first to beef up our existing bodies and not spread thin folks already doing too much. My personal preference. However I am not taking it off the table. It would be great if

Just a thought, could the Sandbox process be amended to be run by a designed to be nimble, yet to be created committee/council/board? Chris Short He/Him/His Sr. Developer Advocate, AWS Kubernetes

Alois. Big thanks for bringing this up! Some observations from me: - there are 21 applications currently in the queue, a bunch of them are resubmissions where the TOC has a set of questions and they

+1 Agree

Agreed. +1 On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 4:25 PM Reitbauer, Alois via lists.cncf.io <alois.reitbauer=dynatrace.com@...> wrote: This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient and

+1

TOC-Members, This email is a follow up of a conversation I started with dims. I am asking you to rethink the current Sandbox process – mostly regarding speed. The idea of having a way to

+1 non Binding. Really pleased to see initiatives like this kicking off and looking at computing from a new angle. Will be watching this with interest.