|
Re: [VOTE] CubeFS for incubation
+1 binding
--
~Dave
By
Dave Zolotusky
·
#6856
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CubeFS for incubation
+1 binding
--
Erin A. Boyd
Director of Emerging Technologies OCTO
Distinguished Engineer
Red Hat
+1 binding
--
Erin A. Boyd
Director of Emerging Technologies OCTO
Distinguished Engineer
Red Hat
|
By
Erin Boyd
·
#6854
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CubeFS for incubation
+1 binding
By
Ricardo Rocha
·
#6853
·
|
|
Keptn Incubation Proposal - Public Comment
Hi all,
We are opening the public comment period for the proposal of Keptn to progress at the CNCF as an Incubating project.
Due Diligence Doc:
Hi all,
We are opening the public comment period for the proposal of Keptn to progress at the CNCF as an Incubating project.
Due Diligence Doc:
|
By
Lei Zhang
·
#6851
·
|
|
[RESULT] Kubevirt has been approved for incubation
Kubevirt has been approved for incubation: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/6668
8/11
Emily Fox: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/6670
Alena Prokharchyk:
Kubevirt has been approved for incubation: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/6668
8/11
Emily Fox: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/6670
Alena Prokharchyk:
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#6850
·
|
|
TOC Agenda for 4/19
Hi all,
We'll be meeting tomorrow, 4/19 at 8am Pacific to discuss Flux's application for graduation.
Agenda:
Hi all,
We'll be meeting tomorrow, 4/19 at 8am Pacific to discuss Flux's application for graduation.
Agenda:
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#6849
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CubeFS for incubation
+1 Binding
~Emily Fox
@TheMoxieFox
+1 Binding
~Emily Fox
@TheMoxieFox
|
By
Emily Fox
·
#6848
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CubeFS for incubation
+1 Binding
By
Lei Zhang
·
#6847
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CubeFS for incubation
+1 non-binding
By
Herve LECLERC
·
#6846
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CubeFS for incubation
+1 Binding
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
+1 Binding
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
|
By
Davanum Srinivas
·
#6845
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CubeFS for incubation
+1 non-binding
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient and may also be privileged or copyrighted material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of,
+1 non-binding
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient and may also be privileged or copyrighted material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of,
|
By
Alex Chircop
·
#6844
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CubeFS for incubation
+1 non-binding
By
Xing Yang
·
#6843
·
|
|
[VOTE] CubeFS for incubation
CubeFS (previously known as ChubaoFS) has applied to move to the incubation level.
- TOC PR proposal: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/586
- Presentation to CNCF TAG:
CubeFS (previously known as ChubaoFS) has applied to move to the incubation level.
- TOC PR proposal: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/586
- Presentation to CNCF TAG:
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#6842
·
|
|
Re: Proposal TAG Sustainability
Dear TOC members,
First of all, let's give a shout out to Max and all community members!
Environmental sustainability is a critical matter. CNCF should take this opportunity to lead the open source
Dear TOC members,
First of all, let's give a shout out to Max and all community members!
Environmental sustainability is a critical matter. CNCF should take this opportunity to lead the open source
|
By
Huamin Chen
·
#6841
·
|
|
Re: Proposal TAG Sustainability
Hello TOC,
after collecting your feedback on our proposal, we crafted the Work Group charter.
You can find the charter here:
Hello TOC,
after collecting your feedback on our proposal, we crafted the Work Group charter.
You can find the charter here:
|
By
Max Koerbaecher <max@...>
·
#6840
·
|
|
Re: Proposal TAG Sustainability
In addition to Huamin's recommendations, I would suggest some initial focus about propagating standards for observability and measurement, especially in the area of carbon emissions where having an
In addition to Huamin's recommendations, I would suggest some initial focus about propagating standards for observability and measurement, especially in the area of carbon emissions where having an
|
By
Vincent Caldeira
·
#6839
·
|
|
Re: Questions on OpenEBS Incubation Proposal
Xing,
Thanks for the update and summary of questions.
#1 - looks like CNCF staff will take care of this from the service desk ticket and we should be good to go
#2 - similar to #1 as well.
#3 - many
Xing,
Thanks for the update and summary of questions.
#1 - looks like CNCF staff will take care of this from the service desk ticket and we should be good to go
#2 - similar to #1 as well.
#3 - many
|
By
Davanum Srinivas
·
#6838
·
|
|
Re: CubeFS (formerly ChubaoFS) Incubation Proposal - Public Comment
+1 NB
By
YhJIANG
·
#6837
·
|
|
Re: Questions on OpenEBS Incubation Proposal
For point 3, we've had similar situations in other projects - OpenTelemetry comes to mind - with different levels of maturity in sub-components / sub-projects. What previous incarnations of the TOC
For point 3, we've had similar situations in other projects - OpenTelemetry comes to mind - with different levels of maturity in sub-components / sub-projects. What previous incarnations of the TOC
|
By
Liz Rice <liz@...>
·
#6836
·
|
|
Re: CubeFS (formerly ChubaoFS) Incubation Proposal - Public Comment
+1 NB
By
liqingqiya@...
·
#6835
·
|