|
Re: [VOTE] Official vote for Knative for inclusion
+1 NB
Regards,
Lawrence
By
Wan, Lawrence
·
#6719
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Backstage for incubation
+1 NB
Regards,
Lawrence
By
Wan, Lawrence
·
#6718
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] In-toto for incubating
+1 binding.
I still have some thoughts around overall velocity, but after talking
to h01ger off-list, I am confident in changing my vote.
The rest of this email is more about Debian than CNCF, feel
+1 binding.
I still have some thoughts around overall velocity, but after talking
to h01ger off-list, I am confident in changing my vote.
The rest of this email is more about Debian than CNCF, feel
|
By
Richard Hartmann
·
#6717
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Backstage for incubation
+1 binding
By
Ricardo Rocha
·
#6716
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Backstage for incubation
+1 binding
--
Erin A. Boyd
Distinguished Engineer, OCTO
Red Hat
eboyd@...
+1 binding
--
Erin A. Boyd
Distinguished Engineer, OCTO
Red Hat
eboyd@...
|
By
Erin Boyd
·
#6715
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Backstage for incubation
+1 binding
Justin
By
Justin Cormack
·
#6714
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Backstage for incubation
+1 non-binding
Chris Short
He/Him/His
TZ=America/Detroit
+1 non-binding
Chris Short
He/Him/His
TZ=America/Detroit
|
By
Chris Short
·
#6713
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Backstage for incubation
I will abstain from this vote as I’m too close to this project. I feel that voting on it would be a conflict of interest.
~Dave
I will abstain from this vote as I’m too close to this project. I feel that voting on it would be a conflict of interest.
~Dave
|
By
Dave Zolotusky
·
#6712
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Backstage for incubation
+1 nb
By
alexis richardson
·
#6711
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Backstage for incubation
+1 NB
Super excited to see this.
-JM
+1 NB
Super excited to see this.
-JM
|
By
Walker, JohnMark
·
#6710
·
|
|
[VOTE] Backstage for incubation
Backstage has applied to move to the incubation level.
PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/717
Due Diligence doc:
Backstage has applied to move to the incubation level.
PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/717
Due Diligence doc:
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#6709
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] In-toto for incubating
Hi Richard,
Thank you for the thorough review and detailed comments! And thanks for the nudge about the Debian releases, I just pushed an up-to-date downstream release to mentors [1].
Regarding our
Hi Richard,
Thank you for the thorough review and detailed comments! And thanks for the nudge about the Debian releases, I just pushed an up-to-date downstream release to mentors [1].
Regarding our
|
By
Lukas Puehringer
·
#6708
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Official vote for Knative for inclusion
+1 NB.
--
Oleg Chornyi,
ventuscloud.eu
+1 NB.
--
Oleg Chornyi,
ventuscloud.eu
|
By
Oleg Chornyi
·
#6707
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Kubevirt for inclusion
+1 binding
Justin
By
Justin Cormack
·
#6706
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Kubevirt for inclusion
+1 binding
By
Lei Zhang
·
#6705
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Kubevirt for inclusion
+1 binding
By
Matt Farina
·
#6704
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Kubevirt for inclusion
+1 non-binding
--Sheng
By
Sheng Yang
·
#6703
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] In-toto for incubating
Thank you for the quick & detailed response.
Also, again, I am still getting up to speed with this new hat on.
Sorry, for being unclear; the DD doc referred to Debian as a company.
The rest was me
Thank you for the quick & detailed response.
Also, again, I am still getting up to speed with this new hat on.
Sorry, for being unclear; the DD doc referred to Debian as a company.
The rest was me
|
By
Richard Hartmann
·
#6702
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] In-toto for incubating
+1 nb
By
Brandon Lum
·
#6701
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] In-toto for incubating
+1 NB
By
Ken Owens
·
#6700
·
|