cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS project proposal (inception)

Also, Camille, please note that CoreDNS (along with all of the other smaller projects) will be holding a salon at CloudNativeCon/KubeCon Berlin on March 30, at which we're hoping to attract new users,

By Dan Kohn <dan@...> · #667 ·

Re: [cncf-ci-public] GSOC 2017 prospective applicant

Please make your SOC related requests on GitHub by filing a GitHub issue: https://github.com/cncf/soc Thanks! -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

By Chris Aniszczyk · #666 ·

GSOC 2017 prospective applicant

Hi, I am a pre final year B.Tech and MS by research student at International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad. I am proficient in python, C++ and Java. I am interested in contributing

By Shrenik Jain <shrenik.jain@...> · #665 ·

Re: CNCF TOC Open Agenda - call for topics

Agreed. This comes up often; we need documentation resources about the projects and on how these projects compare/contrast with vendor-supported solutions. Best, Swarna. On Feb 27, 2017, 6:41 AM

By Swarna Podila (Avi Networks) <swarna@...> · #664 ·

Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS project proposal (inception)

good advice, thank-you

By alexis richardson · #663 ·

Re: [VOTE] CoreDNS project proposal (inception)

I'm +1, with the strong encouragement for this project to find more active committers. It really looks like a one-person show right now. Comparing to our other inception project, which has 7 people

By Camille Fournier · #662 ·

Re: CNCF TOC Open Agenda - call for topics

+1 good topic. <jonathan.boulle@...> wrote:

By alexis richardson · #661 ·

Re: CNCF TOC Open Agenda - call for topics

I'd like to talk again about the CNCF providing documentation resources for projects.

By Jonathan Boulle <jonathan.boulle@...> · #660 ·

CNCF TOC Open Agenda - call for topics

all, post the Tahoe f2f we agreed to run with a more "open agenda" for TOC calls. PLEASE feel free to post topics to this thread over next 24 hours, and I'll work with Chris A to devise an Agenda

By alexis richardson · #659 ·

CNCF speaking opportunities

CNCF will be sponsoring and helping to program content for the events below. We would encourage you to have engineers from your companies propose talks on Kubernetes and other cloud native related

By Dan Kohn <dan@...> · #658 ·

Re: Storage Patterns for container native - community content

Alex, I agree with Clinton’s point that we want to focus on what makes Cloud-Native different, not sure covering all the legacy Storage protocols serves that purpose There are too many users

By Yaron Haviv · #657 ·

Re: Storage Patterns for container native - community content

Clinton / Yaron, Thank you for the feedback. We will get some of that added to the doc, although we were thinking of covering some of those topics in more depth in future articles. We’ll

By Alex Chircop · #656 ·

Re: ANN: Formation of Working Groups

If you are interested in hearing about the progress of the CI working group, I am planning on using the CI mailing list for public discussion. Please join that mailing list,

By Camille Fournier · #655 ·

Re: Storage Patterns for container native - community content

Alex, Sorry for the late review. My concern currently is that the document spends 80% of the time talking about what is known about some storage platforms today and the last portion discussing what

By Kitson, Clinton <Clinton.Kitson@...> · #654 ·

Re: Storage Patterns for container native - community content

I wrote a post a while ago on impact of Cloud-Native on Storage, can reuse its content, you may want to take the abstraction to the next level just like we did on compute (from VMs to

By Yaron Haviv · #653 ·

Re: Storage Patterns for container native - community content

Hi, We have prepared the content for the first topic in the list (albeit a little later than we hoped for). This is the first doc we have produced and is meant to serve as an overview of storage

By Alex Chircop · #652 ·

ANN: Formation of Working Groups

All, An agenda item for the TOC f2f was the possible formation of "working groups". These have come up a number of times in the last 9+ months since the TOC formed. The idea is to spawn CNCF TOC

By alexis richardson · #651 ·

Re: Interesting tech marketing from Amazon

Andy, thanks, sure we should follow w “How” after the “Why” Another reason for that order is to set the architecture context, e.g. many still view containers as lightweight VMs, can see

By Yaron Haviv · #650 ·

Re: Interesting tech marketing from Amazon

I agree the emphasis of our outbound messaging should be on the why (and the "what's in it for me?"). And Yaron's suggestion of "because it gets you business agility through continuous dev and ops")

By Andrew Randall · #649 ·

Re: Interesting tech marketing from Amazon

If anyone care to watch Simon’s talk pointed by Tony: "people don't buyWHAT you do, but WHY you do it", Containers, micro-services, .. are thewhat, my point is we should focus on the Why i.e.

By Yaron Haviv · #648 ·

7341 - 7360 of 8007

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms