+1 non-binding!

+1 binding -- ~Dave

+1 non-binding

Perhaps as a counterpoint, I am aware of several hundred customers using OpenTelemetry in production. With OTEL tracing already heavily used and metrics expected to hit GA by the end of the year I

Hi Mark, Thank you for raising this question. There are no plans to merge OpenTelemetry and OpenMetrics. There is an effort by OpenTelemetry on adding OpenMetrics support to the collector. Together

I am supportive of Openmetrics, but would like to raise a concern. I am hearing more and more customers who are confused with how Opentelemetry metrics and Openmetrics relate to each other and which

+1 binding -alena

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding

OpenMetrics has applied to move from Sandbox to Incubation. PR: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/615 Due Diligence (DD) doc:

Hi Alena, My primary concerns are Metrics and Logs, I was asked by a couple of techs leads about my opinion and I am pretty much sharing the same. For an incubation project, maturity and adoption are

Eduardo, Thank you for advocating on behalf of end-users. Keeping focus on end-user adoption, experience, and ensuring that components maturity is communicated to the users transparently

+1 binding

+1 non-binding

+1 binding Justin

+1, nb From:cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Amye Scavarda Perrin via lists.cncf.io <ascavarda=linuxfoundation.org@...> Date: Tuesday, 6. July 2021 at 21:33 To: CNCF TOC

+1 binding Regarding the communication of different levels of maturity of different parts of the project, the status page is a good addition, thank you!

+1 non-binding

+1 nb 從我的iPhone傳送

+1 binding