|
Re: security & CNCF projects
Essentially we want them to create LFIDs to grant access.
Shubhra
Essentially we want them to create LFIDs to grant access.
Shubhra
|
By
Shubhra Kar
·
#5665
·
|
|
Re: security & CNCF projects
Thanks Stephen.
We have granted access to given access to stefan@....
We are unable to find accounts forhidde@... and michael@... .
Regards,
Vasu
From:Stephen Augustus
Thanks Stephen.
We have granted access to given access to stefan@....
We are unable to find accounts forhidde@... and michael@... .
Regards,
Vasu
From:Stephen Augustus
|
By
Vasu Naidu <vnaidu@...>
·
#5664
·
|
|
Re: security & CNCF projects
Hi Alexis,
You should have access to the security reports of the flux project. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Hi Alexis,
You should have access to the security reports of the flux project. Please let me know if you have any questions.
|
By
Vasu Naidu <vnaidu@...>
·
#5663
·
|
|
Re: security & CNCF projects
As I understand it, https://maintainers.cncf.io/ holds the aggregate maintainers for CNCF project.
For flux, specifically: https://github.com/fluxcd/flux/blob/master/MAINTAINERS
-- Stephen
As I understand it, https://maintainers.cncf.io/ holds the aggregate maintainers for CNCF project.
For flux, specifically: https://github.com/fluxcd/flux/blob/master/MAINTAINERS
-- Stephen
|
By
Stephen Augustus
·
#5662
·
|
|
Re: security & CNCF projects
I would suggest we add access for all the maintainers of the project and anyone on the governance committees (example TSCs).
Do you maintain a maintainers.md file or better for us to just scan the
I would suggest we add access for all the maintainers of the project and anyone on the governance committees (example TSCs).
Do you maintain a maintainers.md file or better for us to just scan the
|
By
Shubhra Kar
·
#5661
·
|
|
Re: security & CNCF projects
thanks, how do I share these with the flux maintainers and community
thanks, how do I share these with the flux maintainers and community
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#5660
·
|
|
Re: security & CNCF projects
Yes, please.
To your general point -- I have a view that if Snyk (or similar) offers a free scanning service to CNCF projects, then the community should benefit. These are completely standard
Yes, please.
To your general point -- I have a view that if Snyk (or similar) offers a free scanning service to CNCF projects, then the community should benefit. These are completely standard
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#5659
·
|
|
Re: security & CNCF projects
Jim,
We are looking into, let me get back to you with an update.
Regards,
Vasu
---
Sr. Director, Head Of Engineering
Cell: 1.408.420.0404
Slack:@Vasu
From:St Leger, Jim
Jim,
We are looking into, let me get back to you with an update.
Regards,
Vasu
---
Sr. Director, Head Of Engineering
Cell: 1.408.420.0404
Slack:@Vasu
From:St Leger, Jim
|
By
Vasu Naidu <vnaidu@...>
·
#5658
·
|
|
Re: security & CNCF projects
That depends on your viewpoint, the maintainers ideally should make that call per project based on whatever security process they have in place for the project. You can have a view that maintainers
That depends on your viewpoint, the maintainers ideally should make that call per project based on whatever security process they have in place for the project. You can have a view that maintainers
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#5657
·
|
|
Re: security & CNCF projects
I see. Well, I'm not.
This info should be open to all, without any barriers whatsoever
I see. Well, I'm not.
This info should be open to all, without any barriers whatsoever
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#5656
·
|
|
Re: security & CNCF projects
I think what Chris means is that if you are already scanning with Snyk, then you won't see anything different in the LFX feed.
I think what Chris means is that if you are already scanning with Snyk, then you won't see anything different in the LFX feed.
|
By
Matt Jarvis
·
#5655
·
|
|
Re: Agenda for TOC Meeting for 2/16
Apologies - will miss TOC liaison discussion today.
No electricity or water in my area. No/limited cellular. Hoping this message catches a signal before tomorrow’s call.
-Lee
Apologies - will miss TOC liaison discussion today.
No electricity or water in my area. No/limited cellular. Hoping this message catches a signal before tomorrow’s call.
-Lee
|
By
Lee Calcote
·
#5654
·
|
|
Re: security & CNCF projects
+ Pranab and Vasu (product/eng leads on LFX I believe.)
Jim
+ Pranab and Vasu (product/eng leads on LFX I believe.)
Jim
|
By
St Leger, Jim
·
#5653
·
|
|
Re: security & CNCF projects
Thanks Chris
It would be great if this data was readily accessible. I don't think packing into GH actions provides that, however useful it may be for other purposes
Thanks Chris
It would be great if this data was readily accessible. I don't think packing into GH actions provides that, however useful it may be for other purposes
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#5652
·
|
|
Re: security & CNCF projects
I'll follow up Alexis on the ticket but it's just white labeled https://snyk.io
If you are already using, say Snyk via github action (https://github.com/snyk/actions/tree/master/golang) you won't see
I'll follow up Alexis on the ticket but it's just white labeled https://snyk.io
If you are already using, say Snyk via github action (https://github.com/snyk/actions/tree/master/golang) you won't see
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#5651
·
|
|
security & CNCF projects
Hi all
Has anyone looked at this?
https://security.lfx.linuxfoundation.org/#/
How do we see project data? I wanted to take a look at flux. I had to create a login. Then, I had to "request" a view,
Hi all
Has anyone looked at this?
https://security.lfx.linuxfoundation.org/#/
How do we see project data? I wanted to take a look at flux. I had to create a login. Then, I had to "request" a view,
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#5650
·
|
|
Agenda for TOC Meeting for 2/16
Hi all,
We'll be meeting tomorrow at 8am Pacific.
We'll have a short discussion about TOC liaisons with the SIGs, and then have an open floor for discussion.
Presentation:
Hi all,
We'll be meeting tomorrow at 8am Pacific.
We'll have a short discussion about TOC liaisons with the SIGs, and then have an open floor for discussion.
Presentation:
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#5649
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-flux-maintainers] [cncf-toc] Flux for Incubation Public Comment Period
Hi Liz, Michelle, all,
Stefan and Daniel have responded on individual points. I'll attempt to fill in the remainder --
The discussion in https://github.com/fluxcd/flux2/discussions/620 may run for a
Hi Liz, Michelle, all,
Stefan and Daniel have responded on individual points. I'll attempt to fill in the remainder --
The discussion in https://github.com/fluxcd/flux2/discussions/620 may run for a
|
By
Michael Bridgen <michael@...>
·
#5648
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-flux-maintainers] [cncf-toc] Flux for Incubation Public Comment Period
Hi Liz,
We've updated the Flagger logo on the docs website including all diagrams. The description now states that Flagger is part of the Flux family.
Please let us know if there is something else we
Hi Liz,
We've updated the Flagger logo on the docs website including all diagrams. The description now states that Flagger is part of the Flux family.
Please let us know if there is something else we
|
By
Stefan Prodan <stefan@...>
·
#5647
·
|
|
Re: Flux for Incubation Public Comment Period
Hello everybody,
In argoproj/gitops-engine#126 I updated the FAQ to reflect the current situation, but didn't want to update the rest of FAQ as I didn't want to speak for the Argo project. I just
Hello everybody,
In argoproj/gitops-engine#126 I updated the FAQ to reflect the current situation, but didn't want to update the rest of FAQ as I didn't want to speak for the Argo project. I just
|
By
Daniel Holbach <daniel@...>
·
#5646
·
|