Congrats to the newly appointed members and thank you Brendan, Matt, and Xiang for all that you do! -- Stephen

Many thanks to all who participated in the process! I'm pleased to announce the results of the TOC Election for the GB and End User selected seats for 2021. End User selected seats: Dave Zolotusky

Hi all, We'll be meeting tomorrow at 8am Pacific. This is a SIG update meeting, but we'll also be welcoming our new TOC members. Presentation:

Many apologies, I have to miss tomorrow’s TOC again - we have our company 2021 kick-off event. This is two public meetings in a row I’ve had to miss, I will be there for the next one come hell or

Open Policy Agent has been approved for graduation. (https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/5351) 7/10 Alena Prokharchyk https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/5397 Sheng Liang:

+1 BR, AKS

+1 binding

+1 NB Barak Stout

+1 non binding -- Bhaarat Sharma Raft | CTO M. 703-708-4463 Schedule a meeting (Calendly) bsharma@... SBA 8(a) Certified | WOSB

+1 binding

It's https://github.com/docker/distribution They will pick a new org name and so on. -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra)

Hi all, Does anyone have details on what “Distribution” is? That is a super generic name and the linked issue doesn’t have any pointers to other resources to orient me. Joe

The TOC has reviewed the projects that have applied to be included in Sandbox, see the results below. Our next Sandbox review meeting is March 23, 2021. GitOps Working Group passes with a majority

Congratulations to our nominees for the Technical Oversight Committee! These nominees have all passed the qualification process from the Governing Board and TOC. Ricardo Aravena John Belamaric Erin

I will have to skip as well. Please let me know where I can help. Michelle

I have as well, apologies too. Justin

Sorry folks, I've got a conflict for tomorrow's TOC meeting, and I will have to skip this one Liz

I think that's the heart of the confusion / expectation that I'm seeing. (Or even more precisely that anything under v1.0 is seen by many as not production-ready.) Ack that not every project sees it

if CNCF wants to help, then publish some guidelines. Or, people will just do their own thing.

Let's face it. Most uses of x.y.z aren't SemVer and most people haven't read the spec :) I think something about graduated projects having a documented policy around versioning is probably