|
Re: FYI: Fuzzing for CNCF Projects
That's a very insightful report! Would be great to see more CNCF projects using fuzzing integration to simplify vulnerability scanning and bug fixing.
That's a very insightful report! Would be great to see more CNCF projects using fuzzing integration to simplify vulnerability scanning and bug fixing.
|
By
Katie Gamanji
·
#5583
·
|
|
Re: SIG-Security Tech Lead nominations
+1 NB
Thank you Ashutosh Narkar, Aradhana Chetal and Andres Vega for all the hard work advancing SIG-Security.
Dan Shaw
@dshaw
Cor.dev - Solving Solved Problems đź’—
+1 NB
Thank you Ashutosh Narkar, Aradhana Chetal and Andres Vega for all the hard work advancing SIG-Security.
Dan Shaw
@dshaw
Cor.dev - Solving Solved Problems đź’—
|
By
Dan Shaw
·
#5582
·
|
|
Re: SIG-Security Tech Lead nominations
+1 NB
Katie Gamanji
By
Katie Gamanji
·
#5581
·
|
|
Re: Public comment period for Ambassador
> I object to the name "Ingress Controller for Envoy Proxy” as that also describes Contour. This will create confusion and will be easily misread as "THE Ingress Controller for Envoy Proxy" and
> I object to the name "Ingress Controller for Envoy Proxy” as that also describes Contour. This will create confusion and will be easily misread as "THE Ingress Controller for Envoy Proxy" and
|
By
Matt Klein
·
#5580
·
|
|
Re: Public comment period for Ambassador
What is the new name? The name "ambassador" is all over the docs and I'd expect to see this reframed around the new name.
I object to the name "Ingress Controller for Envoy Proxy” as that also
What is the new name? The name "ambassador" is all over the docs and I'd expect to see this reframed around the new name.
I object to the name "Ingress Controller for Envoy Proxy” as that also
|
By
Joe Beda
·
#5579
·
|
|
Public comment period for Ambassador
All,
Ambassador is applying for incubation status:
Issue: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/435
DD: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bJhfqEADNI7YSQPyi8Kmb1VvN2FaqxMFRsYvp-vZQLg/edit
DD has been
All,
Ambassador is applying for incubation status:
Issue: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/435
DD: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bJhfqEADNI7YSQPyi8Kmb1VvN2FaqxMFRsYvp-vZQLg/edit
DD has been
|
By
Matt Klein
·
#5578
·
|
|
Re: SIG-Security Tech Lead nominations
+1 binding
-alena.
By
Alena Prokharchyk
·
#5577
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] SIG-Security Tech Lead nominations
+1, binding
--brendan
By
Brendan Burns
·
#5576
·
|
|
Re: SIG-Security Tech Lead nominations
+1 binding
--
~Dave
By
Dave Zolotusky
·
#5575
·
|
|
Re: SIG-Security Tech Lead nominations
+1 NB
On Jan 6, 2021, 4:35 AM -0500, Liz Rice <liz@...>, wrote:
+1 NB
On Jan 6, 2021, 4:35 AM -0500, Liz Rice <liz@...>, wrote:
|
By
John Hillegass
·
#5574
·
|
|
SIG-Security Tech Lead nominations
Bumping this vote, as it would be great to get the new SIG Security leads in place if others on the TOC are comfortable with these nominees
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Justin Cormack
Bumping this vote, as it would be great to get the new SIG Security leads in place if others on the TOC are comfortable with these nominees
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Justin Cormack
|
By
Liz Rice
·
#5573
·
|
|
[TOC] Nominations Open through 12pm PT, January 11, 2021
Just a reminder about upcoming TOC elections for the GB and end user seats!
Feel free to petition your GB and end user member representatives!
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Amye
Just a reminder about upcoming TOC elections for the GB and end user seats!
Feel free to petition your GB and end user member representatives!
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Amye
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#5572
·
|
|
Re: FYI: Fuzzing for CNCF Projects
Thanks for sharing, this is a very useful initiative Chris.
I’ve been thinking about doing a proposal for the Falco project to adopt syzcaller[0] to perform continuous fuzzing of the inputs/language
Thanks for sharing, this is a very useful initiative Chris.
I’ve been thinking about doing a proposal for the Falco project to adopt syzcaller[0] to perform continuous fuzzing of the inputs/language
|
By
Lorenzo Fontana <fontanalorenz@...>
·
#5571
·
|
|
FYI: Fuzzing for CNCF Projects
Hey TOC and the wider community, some of our projects have taken advantage of fuzzing (through oss-fuzz and other tools), also we recently funded some fuzzing/audit work for fluentbit to see the
Hey TOC and the wider community, some of our projects have taken advantage of fuzzing (through oss-fuzz and other tools), also we recently funded some fuzzing/audit work for fluentbit to see the
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#5570
·
|
|
Agenda for 1/5
Hi all,
We'll be meeting tomorrow at 8am Pacific.
Agenda: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jpoKT12jf2jTf-2EJSAl4iTdA7Aoj_uiI19qIaECNFc/edit
Presentation:
Hi all,
We'll be meeting tomorrow at 8am Pacific.
Agenda: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jpoKT12jf2jTf-2EJSAl4iTdA7Aoj_uiI19qIaECNFc/edit
Presentation:
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#5569
·
|
|
FYI: CNCF Annual Report 2020!
Hey all, hope everyone is having a great 2021!
At the end of last year, we posted the CNCF annual report covering what we accomplished in 2020:
Hey all, hope everyone is having a great 2021!
At the end of last year, we posted the CNCF annual report covering what we accomplished in 2020:
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#5568
·
|
|
Re: SIG-Security Tech Lead nominations
+1 binding
Justin
By
Justin Cormack
·
#5567
·
|
|
Re: SIG-Security Tech Lead nominations
+1 NB. I've had the chance to work with all of the nominees over various projects, issues and security assessments in the sig and they are all great candidates for tech leads!
+1 NB. I've had the chance to work with all of the nominees over various projects, issues and security assessments in the sig and they are all great candidates for tech leads!
|
By
Brandon Lum
·
#5566
·
|
|
Re: SIG-Security Tech Lead nominations
A robust NB+1. I only know Andres well (and he's the bomb diggity), but I'm grateful for all of these folks.
A robust NB+1. I only know Andres well (and he's the bomb diggity), but I'm grateful for all of these folks.
|
By
Chase Pettet <chase.mp@...>
·
#5565
·
|
|
Re: SIG-Security Tech Lead nominations
Super that we have these qualified and enthusiastic candidates!
I’m happy to call this TOC vote, and give it my +1 for all three nominees
Liz
Super that we have these qualified and enthusiastic candidates!
I’m happy to call this TOC vote, and give it my +1 for all three nominees
Liz
|
By
Liz Rice
·
#5564
·
|