+1 (binding) Emily has been extremely influential in helping SIG Security Justin

+1 nb, Emily is extremely knowledgeable and generous. We would be fortunate to have her in this role.

+1000 - Emily is a perfect fit from my perspective. -- Gadi Naor◆CTO US. 2443 Fillmore St, San Francisco, CA, 94115 IL. 5 Miconis St, Tel Aviv, 6777214 M. +972-52-6618811Web.

JJ already mentioned me in original email, but wanted to add my official +1 As SIG-Security co-chair, I strongly support the nomination of Emily Fox! Also, I wanted to add my thanks to out-going

+1 I follow along mostly via meeting recordings and on Slack but from what I can tell, she seems perfect for the role! -- John Hillegass https://4g3.dev/ Want to schedule a call? LinkedIn Github

+1

Emily is a wonderfull collaborator and human being. Strongly support.

I think Emily is a great candidate for the role and I support the nomination!

I'd like to strongly support. She will be great in the role!

Dear Technical Oversight Committee, Dan Shaw’s term as co-chair of SIG-Security has come to an end. We would like to nominate Emily Fox as a new co-chair of SIG-Security (requiring a 2/3rd vote

The OpenKruise project agree with the Sig App's assessment completely. We, too, believe while up-streaming some of the features to the core workloads is possible, the majority of the controllers and

We discussed OpenKruise in Kubernetes SIG Apps. I can now answer questions asked of SIG Apps. In the meeting what OpenKruise is building was discussed along with how things could operate between SIG

I believe similar point about the core-project/heart-of-the-system maintainership is raised on the past graduation proposal

+1 thanks Torin (TOC folks - this seems an interesting model we should think about in the broader discussion of governance models / steering committees)

Great, thank you for the clarification!

No, it’s an organization vote meaning each organization can only vote once. -- -Torin

Got it. Since, 4/8 maintainers are from a single organization and changes require 2/3 majority, does that mean a single organization could effectively veto any changes?

> What does "all areas of expertise" mean? Does it mean all the folks in https://github.com/open-policy-agent/opa/blob/master/MAINTAINERS.md ? Yes, any maintainer, regardless of their area of

Thank you for the clarification Torin! The governance doc says "All changes in Governance require a 2/3 majority organization vote from all areas of expertise." What does "all areas of expertise"

Hi Liz, To your comment, the OPA governance model protects against one organization unfairly controlling any part of the project (including the open-policy-agent/opa repository) by allowing any