I believe similar point about the core-project/heart-of-the-system maintainership is raised on the past graduation proposal

+1 thanks Torin (TOC folks - this seems an interesting model we should think about in the broader discussion of governance models / steering committees)

Great, thank you for the clarification!

No, it’s an organization vote meaning each organization can only vote once. -- -Torin

Got it. Since, 4/8 maintainers are from a single organization and changes require 2/3 majority, does that mean a single organization could effectively veto any changes?

> What does "all areas of expertise" mean? Does it mean all the folks in https://github.com/open-policy-agent/opa/blob/master/MAINTAINERS.md ? Yes, any maintainer, regardless of their area of

Thank you for the clarification Torin! The governance doc says "All changes in Governance require a 2/3 majority organization vote from all areas of expertise." What does "all areas of expertise"

Hi Liz, To your comment, the OPA governance model protects against one organization unfairly controlling any part of the project (including the open-policy-agent/opa repository) by allowing any

I am a big fan of OPA, and in general the project seems to be going well. But it does give me pause to see that open-policy-agent/opa (in particular) is controlled by one organisation Liz

Thank you for the clarification Torin, appreciate it. My intention was to highlight the need and to hopefully encourage other organizations to join and help your team. We are participating in the

OPA would be a very welcome addition, in my opinion. -- Chris Short He/Him/His Advisory | Web | Newsletter | Twitch | Twitter | LinkedIn

Hi All, Maor from apolicy.io sent a follow up email asking about organization responsibilities for different repos. This is all covered in the MAINTAINER.md file: # MaintainersThe following table

Congrats ------------------ Original ------------------ From: Steven Tan <steven@...> Date: Thu,Sep 17,2020 2:02 PM To: Tina Tsou <tina.tsou@...> Cc: quinton@... <quinton@...>, Amye Scavarda Perrin

Congrats to the KubeEdge team!

Hi Maor, Gatekeeper is not a separate project--it's a part of the OPA project. Microsoft and Google are maintainers of Gatekeeper as well as OPA, meaning all three organizations have the voting rights

Hey, Great news and congratulations to the OPA team, great project and a cornerstone for the cloud native enterprise. Looking at the maintainer status on the project, I wonder if there’s a plan to

Congrats at KubeEdge Project! Look forward to more deployment. Thank you, Tina ^ ^ IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you

Congrats KubeEdge! Very well earned, IMO. Q -- Quinton Hoole quinton@...

As some of you are probably aware, I've been a strong proponent of OPA for several years now. Both the project, and the team seem like a great fit for CNCF graduation. I have not yet read the full

Folks The OPA project has applied for graduation from incubation to graduated. (https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/520) The due dilligence document can be found here: