|
Re: [RESULT] KubeEdge to move to Incubation
Congrats to the KubeEdge team!
Congrats to the KubeEdge team!
|
By
Steven Tan <steven@...>
·
#5287
·
|
|
Re: OPA to graduation
Hi Maor,
Gatekeeper is not a separate project--it's a part of the OPA project. Microsoft and Google are maintainers of Gatekeeper as well as OPA, meaning all three organizations have the voting rights
Hi Maor,
Gatekeeper is not a separate project--it's a part of the OPA project. Microsoft and Google are maintainers of Gatekeeper as well as OPA, meaning all three organizations have the voting rights
|
By
Torin Sandall
·
#5286
·
|
|
Re: OPA to graduation
Hey,
Great news and congratulations to the OPA team, great project and a cornerstone for the cloud native enterprise.
Looking at the maintainer status on the project, I wonder if there’s a plan to
Hey,
Great news and congratulations to the OPA team, great project and a cornerstone for the cloud native enterprise.
Looking at the maintainer status on the project, I wonder if there’s a plan to
|
By
Maor Goldberg <maor@...>
·
#5285
·
|
|
Re: [RESULT] KubeEdge to move to Incubation
Congrats at KubeEdge Project!
Look forward to more deployment.
Thank you,
Tina ^ ^
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you
Congrats at KubeEdge Project!
Look forward to more deployment.
Thank you,
Tina ^ ^
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you
|
By
Tina Tsou
·
#5284
·
|
|
Re: [RESULT] KubeEdge to move to Incubation
Congrats KubeEdge! Very well earned, IMO.
Q
--
Quinton Hoole
quinton@...
Congrats KubeEdge! Very well earned, IMO.
Q
--
Quinton Hoole
quinton@...
|
By
Quinton Hoole <quinton@...>
·
#5283
·
|
|
Re: OPA to graduation
As some of you are probably aware, I've been a strong proponent of OPA for several years now. Both the project, and the team seem like a great fit for CNCF graduation.
I have not yet read the full
As some of you are probably aware, I've been a strong proponent of OPA for several years now. Both the project, and the team seem like a great fit for CNCF graduation.
I have not yet read the full
|
By
Quinton Hoole <quinton@...>
·
#5282
·
|
|
OPA to graduation
Folks
The OPA project has applied for graduation from incubation to graduated. (https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/520)
The due dilligence document can be found here:
Folks
The OPA project has applied for graduation from incubation to graduated. (https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/520)
The due dilligence document can be found here:
|
By
Brendan Burns
·
#5281
·
|
|
[RESULT] KubeEdge to move to Incubation
KubeEdge is approved to move to incubation: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/461
7/10
Alena Prokharchyk: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/5017
Brendan Burns:
KubeEdge is approved to move to incubation: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/461
7/10
Alena Prokharchyk: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/5017
Brendan Burns:
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#5280
·
|
|
Agenda for 9/15
Hi all,
We'll be meeting tomorrow with a presentation on the latest End User Tech Radar.
Agenda: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jpoKT12jf2jTf-2EJSAl4iTdA7Aoj_uiI19qIaECNFc/edit
Presentation:
Hi all,
We'll be meeting tomorrow with a presentation on the latest End User Tech Radar.
Agenda: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jpoKT12jf2jTf-2EJSAl4iTdA7Aoj_uiI19qIaECNFc/edit
Presentation:
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#5279
·
|
|
Re: [RESULT] Tech Lead nomination for SIG Observability: Bartłomiej Płotka
Thanks, Amye for the summary, and thank you All for your trust! (:
Looking forward to what we can achieve together in the CNCF Observability space 💪
Kind Regards,
Bartek Płotka (@bwplotka)
Thanks, Amye for the summary, and thank you All for your trust! (:
Looking forward to what we can achieve together in the CNCF Observability space 💪
Kind Regards,
Bartek Płotka (@bwplotka)
|
By
Bartłomiej Płotka
·
#5278
·
|
|
Re: Sandbox Projects included from September 8 TOC meeting
(I am familiar with the team behind the project, and the background of the project).
OpenKurise itself is not an experiment. It supports some of the largest Kubernetes clusters in production
(I am familiar with the team behind the project, and the background of the project).
OpenKurise itself is not an experiment. It supports some of the largest Kubernetes clusters in production
|
By
Li, Xiang
·
#5277
·
|
|
Re: Sandbox Projects included from September 8 TOC meeting
The recording for the 9/8 meeting is up on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_FO3PWnkY4 --
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...
The recording for the 9/8 meeting is up on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_FO3PWnkY4 --
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#5276
·
|
|
Re: Sandbox Projects included from September 8 TOC meeting
OpenKruise is experimenting with a number of workload-related resource definitions, some of which are enhancements to existing core K8s resources. We're happy to see these experiments and want to
OpenKruise is experimenting with a number of workload-related resource definitions, some of which are enhancements to existing core K8s resources. We're happy to see these experiments and want to
|
By
Liz Rice
·
#5275
·
|
|
Re: Sandbox Projects included from September 8 TOC meeting
OpenKruise has reached out to Kubernetes SIG Apps and we will discuss the project.
For context, why would the TOC suggest OpenKruise fall under k8s instead of being it's own CNCF sandbox project?
OpenKruise has reached out to Kubernetes SIG Apps and we will discuss the project.
For context, why would the TOC suggest OpenKruise fall under k8s instead of being it's own CNCF sandbox project?
|
By
Matt Farina
·
#5274
·
|
|
Sandbox Projects included from September 8 TOC meeting
The TOC has reviewed the current Sandbox projects applying for inclusion.
The projects included are:
Backstage
Tremor
metal3-io
Porter
OpenYurt
Open Service Mesh
Other projects not brought to
The TOC has reviewed the current Sandbox projects applying for inclusion.
The projects included are:
Backstage
Tremor
metal3-io
Porter
OpenYurt
Open Service Mesh
Other projects not brought to
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#5273
·
|
|
[RESULT] Tech Lead nomination for SIG Observability: Bartłomiej Płotka
The Tech Lead nomination for SIG Observability - Bartłomiej Płotka passes. (https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/4957)
7/10
+1 Binding
Justin Cormack:
The Tech Lead nomination for SIG Observability - Bartłomiej Płotka passes. (https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/4957)
7/10
+1 Binding
Justin Cormack:
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#5272
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Tech Lead nomination for SIG Observability: Bartłomiej Płotka
+1 binding
By
Li, Xiang
·
#5271
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook Graduation
+1 NB.
By
Queeny Jin
·
#5270
·
|
|
Re: Istio Steering Committee
Yeah, I would love to see more of the other discussion on the gov-wg ML.
Pick it up there?
The "proof" is where it is. If there are people who are allowed to
merge code/docs for the project and
Yeah, I would love to see more of the other discussion on the gov-wg ML.
Pick it up there?
The "proof" is where it is. If there are people who are allowed to
merge code/docs for the project and
|
By
Josh Berkus
·
#5269
·
|
|
Re: Istio Steering Committee
I'm not personally aware of a good example of a strict quorum voting
structure that provided an empowering voice or an ability for people
who are not technically as deep. But I am definitely curious
I'm not personally aware of a good example of a strict quorum voting
structure that provided an empowering voice or an ability for people
who are not technically as deep. But I am definitely curious
|
By
Matt Wilson
·
#5268
·
|