KubeEdge is approved to move to incubation: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/461 7/10 Alena Prokharchyk: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/5017 Brendan Burns:

Hi all, We'll be meeting tomorrow with a presentation on the latest End User Tech Radar. Agenda: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jpoKT12jf2jTf-2EJSAl4iTdA7Aoj_uiI19qIaECNFc/edit Presentation:

Thanks, Amye for the summary, and thank you All for your trust! (: Looking forward to what we can achieve together in the CNCF Observability space 💪 Kind Regards, Bartek Płotka (@bwplotka)

(I am familiar with the team behind the project, and the background of the project). OpenKurise itself is not an experiment. It supports some of the largest Kubernetes clusters in production

The recording for the 9/8 meeting is up on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q_FO3PWnkY4 -- Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...

OpenKruise is experimenting with a number of workload-related resource definitions, some of which are enhancements to existing core K8s resources. We're happy to see these experiments and want to

OpenKruise has reached out to Kubernetes SIG Apps and we will discuss the project. For context, why would the TOC suggest OpenKruise fall under k8s instead of being it's own CNCF sandbox project?

The TOC has reviewed the current Sandbox projects applying for inclusion. The projects included are: Backstage Tremor metal3-io Porter OpenYurt Open Service Mesh Other projects not brought to

The Tech Lead nomination for SIG Observability - Bartłomiej Płotka passes. (https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/4957) 7/10 +1 Binding Justin Cormack:

+1 binding

+1 NB.

Yeah, I would love to see more of the other discussion on the gov-wg ML. Pick it up there? The "proof" is where it is. If there are people who are allowed to merge code/docs for the project and

I'm not personally aware of a good example of a strict quorum voting structure that provided an empowering voice or an ability for people who are not technically as deep. But I am definitely curious

This can actually be a great structure for a project with a small number of vendors doing most of the technical work, but larger number of users. The difficulty is recruiting users with a sufficient

The TiKV project has been approved for graduation. (https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/414) +1 binding: 10/10 Matt Klein: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/5191 Liz Rice:

Hi all, We've opened a PR[1] for Strimzi's annual review under the sandbox process[2]. Kind regards, Tom, on behalf of the Strimzi maintainers. [1]: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/527 [2]:

Thank you everyone who’s putting such thought into this topic. I would like to get a discussion on this onto the TOC meeting agenda at a point where the SIG Contrib Strategy folks have had a chance

If a steering committee is recommended then the reasons for it need to be well documented and articulated. There are a lot of assumptions and they are not shared. That is ripe for

Correct, I think that model is overly prescriptive to recommend for every project. I'm proposing a pattern that can be instantiated in more than one way, depending on what the project team think it

End users having a say in overall direction isn't novel. To me, the communities and ecosystems that are the most resilient and sustainable mindfully include everyone in the evolution of the software,