|
Re: [VOTE] TiKV Graduation
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 02:33 PM, Saad Ali wrote:
as completed the migration of the pd repo from PingCap to the TiKV org. See https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/414#issuecomment-674704044I spoke with
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 02:33 PM, Saad Ali wrote:
as completed the migration of the pd repo from PingCap to the TiKV org. See https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/414#issuecomment-674704044I spoke with
|
By
Saad Ali
·
#5180
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] TiKV Graduation
The TiKV team was very responsive, and has completed the migration of the pd repo from PingCap to the TiKV org. See https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/414#issuecomment-674704044
PTAL
The TiKV team was very responsive, and has completed the migration of the pd repo from PingCap to the TiKV org. See https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/414#issuecomment-674704044
PTAL
|
By
Saad Ali
·
#5179
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Tech Lead nomination for SIG Observability: Bartłomiej Płotka
+1 NB
By
Ganesh Vernekar
·
#5178
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] CNCF position on new Docker policy limiting image retention
The artifact hub already has a "real" use case. That is to make it easier to discover cloud native artifacts for those end-users who consume them. These artifacts are often distributed and hosted all
The artifact hub already has a "real" use case. That is to make it easier to discover cloud native artifacts for those end-users who consume them. These artifacts are often distributed and hosted all
|
By
Matt Farina
·
#5177
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] CNCF position on new Docker policy limiting image retention
I wonder, whether this is the right timing to discuss running a dedicated registry for CNCF projects.
The CNCF is already working on the arfifact hub project. This could be the first real use case
I wonder, whether this is the right timing to discuss running a dedicated registry for CNCF projects.
The CNCF is already working on the arfifact hub project. This could be the first real use case
|
By
Reitbauer, Alois
·
#5176
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook Graduation
Dear all,
+1, NB
Thank you,
Tina ^ ^
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
Dear all,
+1, NB
Thank you,
Tina ^ ^
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify
|
By
Tina Tsou
·
#5175
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook Graduation
+1 binding
By
Liz Rice
·
#5174
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Cortex for Incubation
+1 binding
By
Michelle Noorali <michelle.noorali@...>
·
#5173
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox
+1 binding
I would like to bring the end-user perspective to the discussion. At this stage, there are different requirements to operate a k8s cluster and some teams and companies are using k3s (due to
+1 binding
I would like to bring the end-user perspective to the discussion. At this stage, there are different requirements to operate a k8s cluster and some teams and companies are using k3s (due to
|
By
Katie Gamanji
·
#5172
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Cortex for Incubation
+1 binding
By
Liz Rice
·
#5171
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Thanos for Incubation
+1 binding
By
Michelle Noorali <michelle.noorali@...>
·
#5170
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] CNCF position on new Docker policy limiting image retention
In general, CNCF hasn't paid for infrastructure, so I think if we were going to do something like that, we should talk about it generally.
However, in this case, as was noted, I think the effect is
In general, CNCF hasn't paid for infrastructure, so I think if we were going to do something like that, we should talk about it generally.
However, in this case, as was noted, I think the effect is
|
By
Brendan Burns
·
#5169
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Tech Lead nomination for SIG Observability: Bartłomiej Płotka
+1, binding.
By
Nayak, Mahesh Manjunath (Nokia - US/Mountain View)
·
#5168
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Cortex for Incubation
+1, binding.
By
Brendan Burns
·
#5167
·
|
|
Re: CNCF position on new Docker policy limiting image retention
Adding to this, sccording to the faq, inactive images are defined as images that have not been pulled or pushed in at least 6 months.
This could still break things, but shouldn't be too disruptive for
Adding to this, sccording to the faq, inactive images are defined as images that have not been pulled or pushed in at least 6 months.
This could still break things, but shouldn't be too disruptive for
|
By
Frederick Kautz
·
#5166
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Tech Lead nomination for SIG Observability: Bartłomiej Płotka
+1, binding.
By
Brendan Burns
·
#5165
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Thanos for Incubation
+1 binding
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Justin Cormack via lists.cncf.io" <justin.cormack=docker.com@...>
Reply-To: "justin.cormack@..." <justin.cormack@...>
Date: Monday, August 10, 2020 at
+1 binding
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Justin Cormack via lists.cncf.io" <justin.cormack=docker.com@...>
Reply-To: "justin.cormack@..." <justin.cormack@...>
Date: Monday, August 10, 2020 at
|
By
Sheng Liang <sheng@...>
·
#5164
·
|
|
Re: CNCF position on new Docker policy limiting image retention
I think the FAQ states that only the inactive images will be scheduled for deletion.
https://www.docker.com/pricing/retentionfaq
What will happen to inactive images once the expiration date is
I think the FAQ states that only the inactive images will be scheduled for deletion.
https://www.docker.com/pricing/retentionfaq
What will happen to inactive images once the expiration date is
|
By
saiyam pathak
·
#5163
·
|
|
Re: CNCF position on new Docker policy limiting image retention
This is more of a question for CNCF Staff than the TOC :)
I moved the issue here: https://github.com/cncf/foundation/issues/106
I haven't fully read the policy yet to understand the impact but we are
This is more of a question for CNCF Staff than the TOC :)
I moved the issue here: https://github.com/cncf/foundation/issues/106
I haven't fully read the policy yet to understand the impact but we are
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#5162
·
|
|
CNCF position on new Docker policy limiting image retention
Starting Nov 1, 2020, Docker is planning to limit retention of images on Docker Hub for free accounts to 6m [1]. This will likely affect many CNCF projects that distribute binaries. For example, while
Starting Nov 1, 2020, Docker is planning to limit retention of images on Docker Hub for free accounts to 6m [1]. This will likely affect many CNCF projects that distribute binaries. For example, while
|
By
Yuri Shkuro
·
#5161
·
|