cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

The TiKV team was very responsive, and has completed the migration of the pd repo from PingCap to the TiKV org. See https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/414#issuecomment-674704044 PTAL

By Saad Ali · #5179 ·

Re: [VOTE] Tech Lead nomination for SIG Observability: Bartłomiej Płotka

+1 NB

By Ganesh Vernekar · #5178 ·

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] CNCF position on new Docker policy limiting image retention

The artifact hub already has a "real" use case. That is to make it easier to discover cloud native artifacts for those end-users who consume them. These artifacts are often distributed and hosted all

By Matt Farina · #5177 ·

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] CNCF position on new Docker policy limiting image retention

I wonder, whether this is the right timing to discuss running a dedicated registry for CNCF projects. The CNCF is already working on the arfifact hub project. This could be the first real use case

By Reitbauer, Alois · #5176 ·

Re: [VOTE] Rook Graduation

Dear all, +1, NB Thank you, Tina ^ ^ IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify

By Tina Tsou · #5175 ·

Re: [VOTE] Rook Graduation

+1 binding

By Liz Rice · #5174 ·

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Cortex for Incubation

+1 binding

By Michelle Noorali <michelle.noorali@...> · #5173 ·

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

+1 binding I would like to bring the end-user perspective to the discussion. At this stage, there are different requirements to operate a k8s cluster and some teams and companies are using k3s (due to

By Katie Gamanji · #5172 ·

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Cortex for Incubation

+1 binding

By Liz Rice · #5171 ·

Re: [VOTE] Thanos for Incubation

+1 binding

By Michelle Noorali <michelle.noorali@...> · #5170 ·

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] CNCF position on new Docker policy limiting image retention

In general, CNCF hasn't paid for infrastructure, so I think if we were going to do something like that, we should talk about it generally. However, in this case, as was noted, I think the effect is

By Brendan Burns · #5169 ·

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Tech Lead nomination for SIG Observability: Bartłomiej Płotka

+1, binding.

By Nayak, Mahesh Manjunath (Nokia - US/Mountain View) · #5168 ·

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Cortex for Incubation

+1, binding.

By Brendan Burns · #5167 ·

Re: CNCF position on new Docker policy limiting image retention

Adding to this, sccording to the faq, inactive images are defined as images that have not been pulled or pushed in at least 6 months. This could still break things, but shouldn't be too disruptive for

By Frederick Kautz · #5166 ·

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Tech Lead nomination for SIG Observability: Bartłomiej Płotka

+1, binding.

By Brendan Burns · #5165 ·

Re: [VOTE] Thanos for Incubation

+1 binding From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Justin Cormack via lists.cncf.io" <justin.cormack=docker.com@...> Reply-To: "justin.cormack@..." <justin.cormack@...> Date: Monday, August 10, 2020 at

By Sheng Liang <sheng@...> · #5164 ·

Re: CNCF position on new Docker policy limiting image retention

I think the FAQ states that only the inactive images will be scheduled for deletion. https://www.docker.com/pricing/retentionfaq What will happen to inactive images once the expiration date is

By saiyam pathak · #5163 ·

Re: CNCF position on new Docker policy limiting image retention

This is more of a question for CNCF Staff than the TOC :) I moved the issue here: https://github.com/cncf/foundation/issues/106 I haven't fully read the policy yet to understand the impact but we are

By Chris Aniszczyk · #5162 ·

CNCF position on new Docker policy limiting image retention

Starting Nov 1, 2020, Docker is planning to limit retention of images on Docker Hub for free accounts to 6m [1]. This will likely affect many CNCF projects that distribute binaries. For example, while

By Yuri Shkuro · #5161 ·

Re: k3s sandbox proposal

Hi everyone, Per the TOC's recommendation, the K3s team has updated our README.md to include a roadmap and some other information that hopefully helps clarify what K3s is and isn't. We appreciate the

By craig@... · #5160 ·

2821 - 2840 of 7995

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms