|
Re: Sandbox annual reviews
+1
By
Michelle Noorali <michelle.noorali@...>
·
#4947
·
|
|
Re: Proposal for a new "Steering Committee Charter"
Nice idea, and very well written doc.
I can't help thinking that it might promote excess and undesirable bureaucracy though, unless quite carefully scoped.
Anecdotally, the most common failure modes
Nice idea, and very well written doc.
I can't help thinking that it might promote excess and undesirable bureaucracy though, unless quite carefully scoped.
Anecdotally, the most common failure modes
|
By
Quinton Hoole <quinton@...>
·
#4946
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] [cncf-toc] Sandbox annual reviews
Agreed - makes sense. We should also merge the new sandbox proposal process into main workflow doc too: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/project_proposals.adoc
Thanks,
Alex
Agreed - makes sense. We should also merge the new sandbox proposal process into main workflow doc too: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/project_proposals.adoc
Thanks,
Alex
|
By
Alex Chircop
·
#4945
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] [cncf-toc] Sandbox annual reviews
+1 NB. Sound logic here.
- Lee
+1 NB. Sound logic here.
- Lee
|
By
Lee Calcote
·
#4944
·
|
|
Re: [EXTERNAL] [cncf-toc] Sandbox annual reviews
+1
By
Michelle Noorali
·
#4943
·
|
|
Sandbox annual reviews
Now that we have the new Sandbox application process running, it might make sense to make similar tweaks to the Sandbox annual review process too. Specifically I'd like to suggest:
* Moving from
Now that we have the new Sandbox application process running, it might make sense to make similar tweaks to the Sandbox annual review process too. Specifically I'd like to suggest:
* Moving from
|
By
Liz Rice
·
#4942
·
|
|
Re: Proposal for a new "Steering Committee Charter"
Thanks Quinton, you raise good points.
The SC is indeed meant to add value to the project and not introduce bureaucracy or 'interference'. Most projects are pretty good at running themselves. We
Thanks Quinton, you raise good points.
The SC is indeed meant to add value to the project and not introduce bureaucracy or 'interference'. Most projects are pretty good at running themselves. We
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#4941
·
|
|
Re: Proposal for a new "Steering Committee Charter"
Josh
Thanks!
I would like to keep this at top level (TOC) for now, to maximise the
attention on it. Once the foundational principles have been
established (or rejected) by the TOC, I would be very
Josh
Thanks!
I would like to keep this at top level (TOC) for now, to maximise the
attention on it. Once the foundational principles have been
established (or rejected) by the TOC, I would be very
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#4940
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Operator Framework SDK and OLM
+1 binding
By
Michelle Noorali <michelle.noorali@...>
·
#4939
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] TiKV Graduation
+1 binding
By
Li, Xiang
·
#4938
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook Graduation
+1 binding
By
Li, Xiang
·
#4937
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook Graduation
+1 NB
Thank you,
Tina ^ ^
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
+1 NB
Thank you,
Tina ^ ^
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
|
By
Tina Tsou
·
#4936
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook Graduation
+1 non-binding
--
Chris Short
He/Him/His
Web | Twitch | Twitter | LinkedIn
+1 non-binding
--
Chris Short
He/Him/His
Web | Twitch | Twitter | LinkedIn
|
By
Chris Short
·
#4935
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook Graduation
+1 non-binding
By
Burdis, Keith R.
·
#4934
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook Graduation
+1 NB
By
Yash Thakkar
·
#4933
·
|
|
[RESULT] Contour approved
Contour has requested to join at the incubation level. (https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/330/commits)
https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/4653
+1 Binding: *note: Quorum is 10 as Jeff Brewer has
Contour has requested to join at the incubation level. (https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/330/commits)
https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/4653
+1 Binding: *note: Quorum is 10 as Jeff Brewer has
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#4932
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook Graduation
+1 NB
--
Erin A. Boyd
Distinguished Engineer, OCTO
Red Hat
eboyd@...
+1 NB
--
Erin A. Boyd
Distinguished Engineer, OCTO
Red Hat
eboyd@...
|
By
Erin Boyd
·
#4931
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook Graduation
+1 NB
--Kiran Mova | Co-Founder, Chief Architect MayaData | kiran.mova@...
https://github.com/openebs/openebs
+1 NB
--Kiran Mova | Co-Founder, Chief Architect MayaData | kiran.mova@...
https://github.com/openebs/openebs
|
By
Kiran Mova
·
#4930
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook Graduation
+1 non-binding
By
moh.ahmed@...
·
#4929
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Approving Stephen Augustus as SIG Contributor Strategy Chair
+1 NB
--
Brendan O'Leary
Sr. Developer Evangelist | Direct +1 415.830.4859
+1 NB
--
Brendan O'Leary
Sr. Developer Evangelist | Direct +1 415.830.4859
|
By
Brendan O'Leary
·
#4928
·
|