|
Re: [VOTE] Spiffe/Spire Incubation
+1 binding
By
Matt Klein
·
#4738
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Contour Incubation
+1 binding
By
Matt Klein
·
#4737
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Spiffe/Spire Incubation
+1 non-binding.
SPIFFE and SPIRE have been absolutely fascinating to watch. Despite still being early in its overall life, SPIFFE and SPIRE already have a massive impact in the Cloud Native space.
|
+1 non-binding.
SPIFFE and SPIRE have been absolutely fascinating to watch. Despite still being early in its overall life, SPIFFE and SPIRE already have a massive impact in the Cloud Native space.
|
By
Frederick Kautz
·
#4736
·
|
|
Re: [Vote] Harbor Graduation
+1 non-binding
By
Joe Searcy
·
#4735
·
|
|
Re: [Vote] Harbor Graduation
+1 NB
By
Justin Cappos <jcappos@...>
·
#4734
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Contour Incubation
+100 NB
--
Gadi Naor◆CTO
US. 2443 Fillmore St, San Francisco, CA, 94115
IL. 5 Miconis St, Tel Aviv, 6777214 M. +972-52-6618811Web. www.alcide.io
GitHub. github.com/alcideio
Securing
|
+100 NB
--
Gadi Naor◆CTO
US. 2443 Fillmore St, San Francisco, CA, 94115
IL. 5 Miconis St, Tel Aviv, 6777214 M. +972-52-6618811Web. www.alcide.io
GitHub. github.com/alcideio
Securing
|
By
Gadi Naor
·
#4733
·
|
|
Re: [Vote] Harbor Graduation
+1 NB
Kind regards,
Hamza Sağ
Senior DevOps Engineer
M: +90 544 354 11 81
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Amye Scavarda Perrin via lists.cncf.io"
|
+1 NB
Kind regards,
Hamza Sağ
Senior DevOps Engineer
M: +90 544 354 11 81
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Amye Scavarda Perrin via lists.cncf.io"
|
By
Hamza Sağ
·
#4732
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Contour Incubation
+1, non-binding
Philippe
By
Philippe Robin
·
#4731
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Spiffe/Spire Incubation
+1, non-binding
Philippe
By
Philippe Robin
·
#4730
·
|
|
Re: [Vote] Harbor Graduation
+1, nb
Philippe
By
Philippe Robin
·
#4729
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Spiffe/Spire Incubation
+1 nb (yay!)
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 at 1:27 PM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Spiffe/Spire
|
+1 nb (yay!)
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 at 1:27 PM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Spiffe/Spire
|
By
Geri Jennings
·
#4728
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Spiffe/Spire Incubation
+1 nb
By
Stephen Augustus
·
#4727
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Contour Incubation
+1 nb
By
Stephen Augustus
·
#4726
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Contour Incubation
+1 non-binding
By
Tero Saarni
·
#4725
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Spiffe/Spire Incubation
+1 NB
By
Justin Cappos <jcappos@...>
·
#4724
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Spiffe/Spire Incubation
+1 non-binding
By
paul.holland@...
·
#4723
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Spiffe/Spire Incubation
+1 non-binding
--
Chris Short
He/Him/His
Web | Twitch | Twitter | LinkedIn
|
+1 non-binding
--
Chris Short
He/Him/His
Web | Twitch | Twitter | LinkedIn
|
By
Chris Short
·
#4722
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Spiffe/Spire Incubation
+1 NB
By
Edward Warnicke
·
#4721
·
|
|
Re: Proposal - the future of Sandbox
There are two types of Sandbox projects. There are those “experimental” projects or places where a little-s sandbox is needed on neutral ground.
There are projects that are clearly headed towards
|
There are two types of Sandbox projects. There are those “experimental” projects or places where a little-s sandbox is needed on neutral ground.
There are projects that are clearly headed towards
|
By
Bob Wise (AWS)
·
#4720
·
|
|
Re: Proposal - the future of Sandbox
Erin,
Might I suggest a 3rd alternative reason.
The sandbox process used to be fairly simple for the TOC and those bringing the process in. It had it's pitfalls (e.g., finding TOC members as sponsors
|
Erin,
Might I suggest a 3rd alternative reason.
The sandbox process used to be fairly simple for the TOC and those bringing the process in. It had it's pitfalls (e.g., finding TOC members as sponsors
|
By
Matt Farina
·
#4719
·
|
