|
Re: [VOTE] Contour Incubation
+1 non-binding
By
Tero Saarni
·
#4725
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Spiffe/Spire Incubation
+1 NB
By
Justin Cappos <jcappos@...>
·
#4724
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Spiffe/Spire Incubation
+1 non-binding
By
paul.holland@...
·
#4723
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Spiffe/Spire Incubation
+1 non-binding
--
Chris Short
He/Him/His
Web | Twitch | Twitter | LinkedIn
+1 non-binding
--
Chris Short
He/Him/His
Web | Twitch | Twitter | LinkedIn
|
By
Chris Short
·
#4722
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Spiffe/Spire Incubation
+1 NB
By
Edward Warnicke
·
#4721
·
|
|
Re: Proposal - the future of Sandbox
There are two types of Sandbox projects. There are those “experimental” projects or places where a little-s sandbox is needed on neutral ground.
There are projects that are clearly headed towards
There are two types of Sandbox projects. There are those “experimental” projects or places where a little-s sandbox is needed on neutral ground.
There are projects that are clearly headed towards
|
By
Bob Wise (AWS)
·
#4720
·
|
|
Re: Proposal - the future of Sandbox
Erin,
Might I suggest a 3rd alternative reason.
The sandbox process used to be fairly simple for the TOC and those bringing the process in. It had it's pitfalls (e.g., finding TOC members as sponsors
Erin,
Might I suggest a 3rd alternative reason.
The sandbox process used to be fairly simple for the TOC and those bringing the process in. It had it's pitfalls (e.g., finding TOC members as sponsors
|
By
Matt Farina
·
#4719
·
|
|
Re: Proposal - the future of Sandbox
I just want to clarify a few points...
I believe in the idea of a sandbox. But what are we trying to solve by changing this process?
1) Are we trying to solve the operation efficiency of the TOC by
I just want to clarify a few points...
I believe in the idea of a sandbox. But what are we trying to solve by changing this process?
1) Are we trying to solve the operation efficiency of the TOC by
|
By
Erin Boyd
·
#4718
·
|
|
Re: Are private DD acceptable by TOC?
What Alexis said. It's not always reasonable/possible to only go off of what use is publicly mentioned.
Granted, this really comes back to the quality of production use being "at the discretion of the
What Alexis said. It's not always reasonable/possible to only go off of what use is publicly mentioned.
Granted, this really comes back to the quality of production use being "at the discretion of the
|
By
Matt Klein
·
#4717
·
|
|
Re: Are private DD acceptable by TOC?
If a big production user will provide a testimonial for DD purposes,
it is acceptable for them to request that it not be made public. If
so then the TOC (who vote) can see it to verify that the
If a big production user will provide a testimonial for DD purposes,
it is acceptable for them to request that it not be made public. If
so then the TOC (who vote) can see it to verify that the
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#4716
·
|
|
Are private DD acceptable by TOC?
Hi Matt, TOC
Just starting another thread as this is not related to Contour.
I was under the impression that only the public Adopter.md will be considered.
Are there any guidelines on when TOC will
Hi Matt, TOC
Just starting another thread as this is not related to Contour.
I was under the impression that only the public Adopter.md will be considered.
Are there any guidelines on when TOC will
|
By
Kiran Mova
·
#4715
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Contour Incubation
+1 NB
By
Jeyappragash Jeyakeerthi
·
#4714
·
|
|
Re: Proposal - the future of Sandbox
Matt and Alexis,
Thank you for the answers you both clarify a lot. I’ll propose couple additions to the doc it seems like we might have to add some references to the Sandbox project that might help
Matt and Alexis,
Thank you for the answers you both clarify a lot. I’ll propose couple additions to the doc it seems like we might have to add some references to the Sandbox project that might help
|
By
Angel Ramirez
·
#4713
·
|
|
Re: Proposal - the future of Sandbox
Angel,
I'll give my 2 cents in reverse order....
What makes something a sandbox project is different from the process to be accepted. So, this touches on something semantically different.
The process
Angel,
I'll give my 2 cents in reverse order....
What makes something a sandbox project is different from the process to be accepted. So, this touches on something semantically different.
The process
|
By
Matt Farina
·
#4712
·
|
|
Re: [Vote] Harbor Graduation
+1 nb
---------------------------------------
Best Regards.
Jimmy Song(宋净超)
Developer Advocate at Ant Financial
CNCF Ambassador
Co-founder of ServiceMesher community & Cloud Native Communtiy
+1 nb
---------------------------------------
Best Regards.
Jimmy Song(宋净超)
Developer Advocate at Ant Financial
CNCF Ambassador
Co-founder of ServiceMesher community & Cloud Native Communtiy
|
By
Jimmy Song <jimmysong@...>
·
#4711
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Contour Incubation
+1 nb
<michael.h.payne=jpmchase.com@...> wrote:
+1 nb
<michael.h.payne=jpmchase.com@...> wrote:
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#4710
·
|
|
Re: Proposal - the future of Sandbox
Please read the definition and state whether you are confused by it, or think someone else would be. Then please suggest changes.
https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/sandbox.md
For
Please read the definition and state whether you are confused by it, or think someone else would be. Then please suggest changes.
https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/sandbox.md
For
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#4709
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Contour Incubation
+1 non-binding
By
Payne, Michael H
·
#4708
·
|
|
Re: Proposal - the future of Sandbox
I might be missing something but there is some items still not clear in Sandbox which I think generates confusion.
1. Sandbox projects should be early-stage projects that the CNCF TOC believes warrant
I might be missing something but there is some items still not clear in Sandbox which I think generates confusion.
1. Sandbox projects should be early-stage projects that the CNCF TOC believes warrant
|
By
Angel Ramirez
·
#4707
·
|
|
Re: Proposal - the future of Sandbox
😊. For the end users, this is simple – IMHO your all making this much harder than it needs to be☹
Ken Owens
Vice President
Software Development Engineering
Mastercard
😊. For the end users, this is simple – IMHO your all making this much harder than it needs to be☹
Ken Owens
Vice President
Software Development Engineering
Mastercard
|
By
Owens, Ken <ken.owens@...>
·
#4706
·
|