+1 nb

+1 nb

+1nb Warm Regards Vivian Zhang Tech Infrastucture Group ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mobile／+86 18101131206 Tel／(010)

张丽颖 将撤回邮件“[cncf-toc] [Vote] Harbor Graduation”。

+1nb 发件人: cncf-toc@... [mailto:cncf-toc@...]代表 Amye Scavarda Perrin 发送时间: 2020年5月27日 1:17 收件人: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> 主题: [cncf-toc] [Vote] Harbor Graduation

+1 nb

+1 NB Best Regards, Yusuf Hadiwinata Sutandar VP - Operation & Services PT. Biznet Gio Nusantara GPG:86C2DE58

+1 nb, this is what i waiting for 🙂 Best Regards, Yusuf Hadiwinata Sutandar VP - Operation & Services PT. Biznet Gio Nusantara GPG:86C2DE58

+1 nb.

What Alexis said. What problem(s) are we trying to solve here? Q

Thanks Matt Q

Four things come to mind... Right now the SIGs treat sandbox differently from each other. Some SIGs add additional criteria like things that are incubation and graduation criteria today. The CNCF

Delegation is good but not transfer of accountability

I didn’t said substitute or replace, instead moving from active duty to supervision and guidance. One the biggest strength in leadership is delegation, I strongly beleive giving the proper training

-1 The TOC should NOT step away from shepherding projects at any stage. The SIGs are an essential HELP but not a substitute for the TOC. The 'sandbox' is not "a playground for ideas". I'm sorry Erin

I have to agree with Erin, we should treat sandbox as experimental stage in which TOC should’n be spending time on it and let the SIG’s and the community take care of that. I believe the TOC

+1 !!

That's not too crazy of a suggestion, but that seems to skew towards projects that are done within one company. What I mean by this is that one of the big benefits for Cloud Native Buildpacks of being

I have a radical suggestion...Remove the sandbox entirely. Meaning no votes, no TOC optics. Instead, we shepherd new and emergent projects through the SIGs where they are grown with others in the

+1 nb