cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Topics Expanded Polls

Export Group Data

Between

and

Re: [VOTE] Spiffe/Spire Incubation

+1 non-binding. - Lee

By Lee Calcote · #4651 ·

Re: [VOTE] Spiffe/Spire Incubation

+1 (binding) Justin

By Justin Cormack · #4650 ·

[VOTE] Spiffe/Spire Incubation

Spiffe/Spire has requested to move to the incubation maturity level: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/382 Justin Cormack of the TOC has performed due diligence. Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying

By Amye Scavarda Perrin · #4649 ·

Re: [Vote] Harbor Graduation

+1 nb -- -- Randy AbernethyManaging PartnerRX-M, LLCrandy.abernethy@...o 415-800-2922c 415-624-6447

By Randy Abernethy · #4648 ·

[Vote] Harbor Graduation

Harbor has requested to move to the graduation maturity level: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/311 Harbor has been reviewed by Xiang Li of the TOC and many SIGs. Due Diligence is here:

By Amye Scavarda Perrin · #4647 ·

CNCF Storage Landscape Whitepaper version 2

Hi all, The Storage SIG have been working on an updated landscape document (version 2), which includes a new database section and updates to the orchestration and management sections. The doc is now

By Alex Chircop · #4646 ·

Network Service Mesh 2020 Annual Review

The Network Service Mesh 2020 Annual Review PR has been posted: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/451 Ed

By Ed Warnicke <hagbard@...> · #4645 ·

Re: Proposal - the future of Sandbox

I don't think you can remove the marketing potential. I do think there are things that can be done, though... Make it clear what the different phases of projects are. The CNCF projects page does a

By Matt Farina · #4644 ·

OperatorFramework (SDK and OLM) Public Comment Period

Hello, Operator Framework SDK and OLM sub-projects have applied for join as incubation projects (https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/303). I am the TOC sponsor for Operator Framework, and after

By Katie Gamanji · #4643 ·

Re: Proposal - the future of Sandbox

> If a goal is to remove the unspoken marketing incentives for a project to join the Sandbox, what value does the Sandbox provide that a Working Group with a small initiative seeking a neutral home

By Terence Lee · #4642 ·

Re: Proposal - the future of Sandbox

I’m concerned that we may overcorrecting in this proposal, resulting in little value ascribed to the Sandbox project tier, detracting from the work projects have put in to reach Sandbox. If a goal

By Lee Calcote · #4641 ·

Apologies

Sorry for the late notice, but after a late-breaking conflict has come up and I'm going to have to miss today's meeting Liz

By Liz Rice · #4640 ·

Re: Proposal - the future of Sandbox

A focus on healthy governance is an important consideration as we look across the project levels. Seeding small portions of governance requirements upfront positions the project for future success. In

By Lee Calcote · #4639 ·

Agenda for 5/19 Meeting

Hi all, We'll be meeting tomorrow, this is a TOC + SIG Chair meeting. Agenda: Sandbox Proposal Review * Existing branding * Process for current sandbox proposals * Public comment period Projects

By Amye Scavarda Perrin · #4638 ·

Re: SPIFFE/SPIRE in public comment period for Incubation

We did a sig-security security assessment of SPIFFE/SPIRE, and the project has done a very good job with the security evaluation and risk analysis of its components. More details of the assessment:

By Brandon Lum · #4637 ·

Re: Incubation public comment period

+1. People have other jobs and vacations too. I don't see the need to rush this.

By Quinton Hoole <quinton@...> · #4636 ·

Re: Incubation public comment period

Hi Chris, Not all DD reviews and discussions are open and public. The communications are happening in the private channels, this has been confirmed by the TOC in the meetings. I believe this

By Vinod · #4635 ·

Re: Incubation public comment period

Strong agree with alexis - I’m booked solid these days and unless something is on fire it usually gets bumped down the list. I usually book at a minimum one week out from initial engagement and I

By Kris Nova <kris.nova@...> · #4634 ·

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] Form for Sandbox

Feel free to go ahead and edit. I created a clone of it before I sent it out to the internet for comment, just in case someone wanted to troll. Edit away! --brendan

By Brendan Burns · #4633 ·

2020 Brigade Annual Review

Greetings all, The Brigade 2020 Annual Review PR has been posted at https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/449 per Sandbox project processes. Thank you in advance for your time and energy! Cheers, Vaughn

By Vaughn Dice <Vaughn.Dice@...> · #4632 ·

3361 - 3380 of 8007

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms